NO BLACK MEN

My experience is that most ads that say no black men especially from BP is because their boyfriends or managers are black men and black men dont want to compete with each other because they want to be the dominate one. Now that doesn't go for all but for most. Just saying......

ahhh! ohhh no! Not the true death! pssht. w/e. according to the Mayan's we we aren't supposed to make it through 2012. Originally Posted by sensualsanaa

Since no one has yet had the pleasure of growing the kahunas, and saying the obvious... please allow me the fortitude of being obnoxiously daft.

While it is needless to say that the services that a provider provides is very personal, it should be equally evident that it is no less personal for the client.

The only difference is that the client is paying for it.

If that shocks anyone, deal with it.

The paramount factor involved is that BOTH consenting parties be comfortable for a mutually satisfactory transaction. Moreover, safety is an equal or even a larger concern.

The obvious having been stipulated, let's judiciously celebrate that the provider is putting an AD out on the INTERNET for ALL to see.

Due to the fact that the monger has the benefit of additional info such as pics, reviews, etc... it is fair to state that despite the screening process, the client has more leverage in choosing who he/she would like to visit. Point conceded.

The imagination, therefore, is not stretched that a provider may run into unexpected situations from time to time, despite the screening.

On the other hand, so does the client... is that so hard to imagine also?

The scale mostly balances out in terms of percentages of providers provided for vs clients pampered with the allude of lustful yarn. That's a mathematical derivative.

If you can agree to my arguments thus far, I feel compelled to rhetorically ask "How often does one read a monger state "guys... don't dare see black/brown/yellow/blue/green/pink/purple/turquoise/fat/skinny women"" ?

Therefore, I challenge you in the observation that to advertise "no black men" is very much succumbing to one's subconscious beliefs (and perhaps to a small extent, one's experiences). It implies that the provider is racist, and does not care to admit as much.

While it is her choice, I believe that society need not shelter such misgivings.

Come and mathematically prove me wrong.

I dare you. Originally Posted by rrrabbit

Useless gibberish and extremely close minded

Not a good idea.
I don't think you'll want to hear the truth. Originally Posted by kingorpawn

Nut job with the truth like all the other the truths.

+1

Because black people will be extinct - duh! Originally Posted by ZarahAdams

You are hot, I must have you

+1

Because black people will be extinct - duh! Originally Posted by ZarahAdams

Useless gibberish and extremely close minded

Nut job with the truth like all the other the truths.
Originally Posted by homer13

Some of my best clients are AA. It's a providers choice to see who she wants though.

Since no one has yet had the pleasure of growing the kahunas, and saying the obvious... please allow me the fortitude of being obnoxiously daft.

While it is needless to say that the services that a provider provides is very personal, it should be equally evident that it is no less personal for the client.

The only difference is that the client is paying for it.

If that shocks anyone, deal with it.

The paramount factor involved is that BOTH consenting parties be comfortable for a mutually satisfactory transaction. Moreover, safety is an equal or even a larger concern.

The obvious having been stipulated, let's judiciously celebrate that the provider is putting an AD out on the INTERNET for ALL to see.

Due to the fact that the monger has the benefit of additional info such as pics, reviews, etc... it is fair to state that despite the screening process, the client has more leverage in choosing who he/she would like to visit. Point conceded.

The imagination, therefore, is not stretched that a provider may run into unexpected situations from time to time, despite the screening.

On the other hand, so does the client... is that so hard to imagine also?

The scale mostly balances out in terms of percentages of providers provided for vs clients pampered with the allude of lustful yarn. That's a mathematical derivative.

If you can agree to my arguments thus far, I feel compelled to rhetorically ask "How often does one read a monger state "guys... don't dare see black/brown/yellow/blue/green/pink/purple/turquoise/fat/skinny women"" ?

Therefore, I challenge you in the observation that to advertise "no black men" is very much succumbing to one's subconscious beliefs (and perhaps to a small extent, one's experiences). It implies that the provider is racist, and does not care to admit as much.

While it is her choice, I believe that society need not shelter such misgivings.

Come and mathematically prove me wrong.

I dare you. Originally Posted by rrrabbit

TRUE!

It is probably mainly due to the widespread belief that "Once you go black, you never go back". They don't want to limit their market from that point forward.

Don't worry though, this fallacy, widely spread by Wesley Snipes and other high profile black men, was proven wrong on an episode of "Myth Busters".

rrrabbit, there is actually a reason for paragraphs. They allows us to group our sentences into cohesive thoughts that can be understood by others. Try them and maybe we can more easily parse WTF you are trying to say.
James

Dear Mods: Like all of these posts, this one continues to replicate the same old sentiments/positions we have seen so many times before. I thought the point of having super threads was to spare everybody being bludgeoned with the same threads over and over (whether this subject or others)?

Dear Mods: Like all of these posts, this one continues to replicate the same old sentiments/positions we have seen so many times before. I thought the point of having super threads was to spare everybody being bludgeoned with the same threads over and over (whether this subject or others)? Originally Posted by Bobave

I guess you were confused by the "NO BLACK MEN" title on this thread and didn't realize what the topic was.