Reagan was.in office for SIX YEARS before unemployment dropped below 7% Originally Posted by lostincypressSEE?!? SEE??!?!? Cutting taxes creates jobs. In Shrub's case, it just takes more than 6 years.....a lot more.
nothing exacerbated the financial melt down, the Government let Lehman Bros go down the tubes and AIG insured the rest of the big banks as a hedge just in case one of them failed ... AIG owed so much money to cover policies held by all the major banks they would have went down too and took the world economy with them.FACT: All of the above, you Kool Aid sotted lib-retard, is directly attributable to Carter's Community Reinvestment Act (1977), which forced banks to make risky loans, and Slick Willie the Perjuring Sexual Predator's signing the Financial Services Modernization Act (1999).
I posted the link to the 55 minute vid that explained the bank bailouts, you along with the rest of the Clinton crowd were too stupid to educate yourselves and watch it.
you are as uninformed about the entire situation as I am tired fucking with idiots like you.
The End. Originally Posted by CJ7
SEE?!? SEE??!?!? Cutting taxes creates jobs. In Shrub's case, it just takes more than 6 years.....a lot more.the constant salvo from the House to repeal Obamacare will end in a war to make the tax cuts permanent ..
It doesn't make any difference what really caused any economic meltdown or problem. The Republican solutions is always the same: cut taxes. Now, what does this tell you? Professor?
Maybe they are going to propose tax cuts NO MATTER WHAT BECAUSE IT IS A BASIC BELIEF?
Just like the first solution to any real or imaginary future fiscal crisis is to cut social security, medicare and Medicaid. They've hated those programs since day one and will use any real or imaginary fiscal crisis to propose elimination of those programs as the solution. It is what they do. Originally Posted by timpage
You guys are not very good at your jobs. George Soros should ask for his money back. Okay, RR's average unemployment rate was 7.5% according to someone here (names are changed to protect the stupid). I never mentioned an average so it is a pointless statistic. During the eight years of RR unemployment DID drop below 7%. Also, anyone have the guts to tell the readers here what unemployment (Jimmy Carter's stats) was when RR took office? I'll let you stew over that.
The thing is that five years after RR first took office his policies had reduced unemployment, created growth, and increased the GDP so higher than another president who just happens to also have five years in office. I wonder who that could be... Your idol is a failure, an utter, absolute failure who has no idea how the world works. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn
LMAO, you accept Obama blaming Bush five years into his presidency and don't give RR the credit of two years? You are a partisan hack. What was the prime interest rate when Obummer took office? How about the misery index (a Jimmy Carter invention)? Things were much worse when RR came in and he fixed them. You can't say the same about Obama. Actually you can say the same but it just wouldn't be true would it? Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn
FACT: All of the above, you Kool Aid sotted lib-retard, is directly attributable to Carter's Community Reinvestment Act (1977), which forced banks to make risky loans, and Slick Willie the Perjuring Sexual Predator's signing the Financial Services Modernization Act (1999).
The bad financial policy inherent in Carter's Community Reinvestment Act was exacerbated by Slick Willie the Perjuring Sexual Predator amping up those requirements AND his abolishing the Glass-Steagall Act.
The collapse of the housing market, which had been fraudulently stimulated by the Community Reinvestment Act, was made worse by the fraudulent derivatives market that thrived AFTER Slick Willie the Perjuring Sexual Predator signed the Financial Services Modernization Act of 1999 abolishing the Glass-Steagall Act of 1922.
Keep drinking your Kool Aid, CBJ7, You're the uninformed, ignorant lib-RETARD! Originally Posted by I B Hankering
IdiotBoy thinks Redlegs and Jayhawkers are the same thing too Originally Posted by CJ7All Red Legs were Jayhawkers, but not all Jayhawkers were Red Legs, and -- despite your most ignorant assertion otherwise, nincompoop -- Red Legs and Jayhawkers were not Missourians, CBJ7. BTW, CJ7, your ignorance is on display here and here. Meanwhile, your ignorant ass can't back up your asinine lie with a citation, jackass.