That exactly what I would like to know.
Frankly I am offended you posted that link with those stats.
Some people just never learn.amen!
I have a NAHA policy (no assholes allowed) If you aren't one of those...then feel free to contact me. Originally Posted by reese foster
And what would be the point of that, exactly? Originally Posted by TheBizzerNot being critical . The point as you said -- What's the point?? There's no point. The regular NBA threads are the same . It is as ridiculous as the info I posted. Absolutely meaningless. That was my intention.
That exactly what I would like to know.Lisa, as I said above. And the providers who list a NBA policy also I guess feel the same way as you are - offended-- when someone just posts these stupid NBA threads. Such a futile thread - thats what I meant. No offense to anyone. Just pointing the uselessness of such threads.
Frankly I am offended you posted that link with those stats. Originally Posted by lisa.lisa0302
I didn't answer the door because YOU forgot to bring the condoms!Damn it Lana, now you tell me. I looked all over hell's half acres for the XXXS models, and couldn't find them. That's why I showed up empty handed. (Although I did have a tweezers and magnifying glass stuffed in my pants pocket!)
Ooops, wrong thread!
JUST TEASIN' Originally Posted by Lana Warren
Reeltalk,Great suggestion Lana!
You put yourself out there and really it's good marketing for you! I'm sure you'll receive plenty of PMs from ladies who see AA men! If this problem ever arises for you again, start a thread in ISO, "Looking for ladies who see AA men!" That way, you're being proactive! Good luck with your search, dear! Originally Posted by Lana Warren
Reeltalk,Amazing how you guys continue to miss the point. No wonder this topic continues to be rehashed. My issue is not - finding providers who will see me (providers who actually meet me in person are very surprised and satisfied). My issue or point was/is to give my opinion about why this topic exists and to get more insight. Also to shed more light on the topic and no matter who's tired of it - no two posts are exactly the same. There's something to be learned from every rehashing - if you care to look. But people with opposing agendas will always tend to disagree.
You put yourself out there and really it's good marketing for you! I'm sure you'll receive plenty of PMs from ladies who see AA men! If this problem ever arises for you again, start a thread in ISO, "Looking for ladies who see AA men!" That way, you're being proactive! Good luck with your search, dear! Originally Posted by Lana Warren
Amazing how you guys continue to miss the point. No wonder this topic continues to be rehashed. My issue is not - finding providers who will see me (providers who actually meet me in person are very surprised and satisfied). My issue or point was/is to give my opinion about why this topic exists and to get more insight. Also to shed more light on the topic and no matter who's tired of it - no two posts are exactly the same. There's something to be learned from every rehashing - if you care to look. But people with different agendas will always tend to disagree. Originally Posted by ReeltalkSo being tired of the same threads being posted again and again means you have an agenda and are a white person tying to keep providers from seeing black guys?
So being tired of the same threads being posted again and again means you have an agenda and are a white person tying to keep providers from seeing black guys? Originally Posted by sharktragerNo. Posting the same outdated CDC stat in every NBA post does.
Hmmm . . . I've done my research now (as suggested above), and now have concluded two things about these "beat to death" NBA posts.From the link you posted -
1. The biggest outcry or opposition to these NBA postings seem to be by white males (maybe because of #3). BTW - How do I know they're mainly white males? I could tell by the sound of their voices.
2. Some coward who's afraid to say what he really thinks about black men, uses a CDC stat to imply it for him. HIV is linked more to poverty, than to race. http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/...n6691867.shtml
http://www.avert.org/usa-race-age.htm
delimex007 you are either a liar or a fool (or a very poor researcher). And I would advise you to get the facts right before posting. You keep rehashing outdated 2006 stats and what's interesting is your one-man crusade to re-post this erroneous info in every NBA post you can. (Is there something else you want to tell us?)
The most current CDC stats (2008), tell a different story. http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/topics/surveillance/basic.htm
They reveal that the number of AIDS diagnoses in the 50 states and the District of Columbia, by race or ethnicity found 452,916 blacks were infected -vs- 419,905 whites that were (and not included in this number is the fact that the CDC count many whites as Hispanic). Whats also not included is the number of very elite, and/or wealthy enough of us (mostly white males), who can afford to pay to keep their medical records private.
Not that this "what race has the highest incidence b.s." matters to me. The fact that we are debating this within the confines of a sex provider/hobbyist discussion is asinine within itself. I simply broached the subject in query to some providers having NBA policies. I think you attempted to identify it for another reason altogether.
Note to coward: Do your research by seeking out posts that don't annoy you - and only select those to post in. Originally Posted by Reeltalk