I wish people would stop being naive when it comes to this topic. First, we ALL know it happens in the hobby far more often than what most would think or admit. I'm not advocating everyone BB all the time or heaven forbid advertise it. I'm saying if both parties are comfortable with BBFS, it is a realistic option and choice. People just need to be educated and not fall for the propaganda some out there are peddling. Having BB sex is perfectly normal. Also, I don't buy the argument that you should think of future clients. I'm sure every provider has BBed with a guy at some point in her life, so she is ALREADY exposing future clients. My point is that each person should make up their own mind. For some, they will BB. Some won't. A lot of us will under the right circumstances. Originally Posted by Cpalmson
I think the other way. If I know it maybe abailable, I'm putting the lady on my list of ladies to see. At least, I will research her. If I het a good vibe, I'll probably see her. Doesn't mean I will BBFS with her. Point is, it is another option that I consider when seeing a provider. Originally Posted by Cpalmson
Every woman has barebacked someone before but that would usually be a SO/boyfriend. That does not mean every provider has barebacked a client. It would be irresponsible to go without condoms because you have a comfortable feeling. Since when does being comfortable make it safe for either party? Just because one is clean does not mean disease free, or he is shooting blancks. I would wager that the bareback proponents are not really ready to accept the consequences of unsafe sex. They would be doing the "oh woe is me ..." and contacting attorneys.