Republican incompetence

Still haven't seen one coherent statement refuting anything David Brooks states. I'll safely assume that the usual idiotic banter of those I have blocked doesn't rise to the level of anything requiring a response.

Nobody has anything? Originally Posted by timpage

I thought I did in post #13.

HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! tIMMY...


fuck you...

I thought I did in post #13. Originally Posted by Jackie S

You made his point.

You made his point. Originally Posted by timpage

Karl made your point.

and even if i had you on ignore your tittie avatar would still be visible. that's your only positive contribution here. and since you "claim" to have me on ignore you won't mind if i call you a

FAGGOT
i mean, you'll never know right?



Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

A new addition to woomby's reach-around crew ! woomby will have him playing the rusty trombone in no time !

David Brooks--That first encounter is still vivid in Brooks’s mind. “I remember distinctly an image of–we were sitting on his couches, and I was looking at his pant leg and his perfectly creased pant,” Brooks says, “and I’m thinking, a) he’s going to be president and b) he’ll be a very good president.” In the fall of 2006, two days after Obama’s The Audacity of Hope hit bookstores, Brooks published a glowing Times column. The headline was “Run, Barack, Run.”…

Pretty much says it all about Brooks.

Conservative columnist David Brooks nails it.

The Republicans’ Incompetence Caucus

OCT. 13, 2015


The House Republican caucus is close to ungovernable these days. How did this situation come about?


This was not just the work of the Freedom Caucus or Ted Cruz or one month’s activity. The Republican Party’s capacity for effective self-governance degraded slowly, over the course of a long chain of rhetorical excesses, mental corruptions and philosophical betrayals. Basically, the party abandoned traditional conservatism for right-wing radicalism. Republicans came to see themselves as insurgents and revolutionaries, and every revolution tends toward anarchy and ends up devouring its own.
.
By traditional definitions, conservatism stands for intellectual humility, a belief in steady, incremental change, a preference for reform rather than revolution, a respect for hierarchy, precedence, balance and order, and a tone of voice that is prudent, measured and responsible. Conservatives of this disposition can be dull, but they know how to nurture and run institutions. They also see the nation as one organic whole. Citizens may fall into different classes and political factions, but they are still joined by chains of affection that command ultimate loyalty and love.


All of this has been overturned in dangerous parts of the Republican Party. Over the past 30 years, or at least since Rush Limbaugh came on the scene, the Republican rhetorical tone has grown ever more bombastic, hyperbolic and imbalanced. Public figures are prisoners of their own prose styles, and Republicans from Newt Gingrich through Ben Carson have become addicted to a crisis mentality. Civilization was always on the brink of collapse. Every setback, like the passage of Obamacare, became the ruination of the republic. Comparisons to Nazi Germany became a staple.
This produced a radical mind-set. Conservatives started talking about the Reagan “revolution,” the Gingrich “revolution.” Among people too ill educated to understand the different spheres, political practitioners adopted the mental habits of the entrepreneur. Everything had to be transformational and disruptive. Hierarchy and authority were equated with injustice. Self-expression became more valued than self-restraint and coalition building. A contempt for politics infested the Republican mind.
Politics is the process of making decisions amid diverse opinions. It involves conversation, calm deliberation, self-discipline, the capacity to listen to other points of view and balance valid but competing ideas and interests.

But this new Republican faction regards the messy business of politics as soiled and impure. Compromise is corruption. Inconvenient facts are ignored. Countrymen with different views are regarded as aliens. Political identity became a sort of ethnic identity, and any compromise was regarded as a blood betrayal.

A weird contradictory mentality replaced traditional conservatism. Republican radicals have contempt for politics, but they still believe that transformational political change can rescue the nation. Republicans developed a contempt for Washington and government, but they elected leaders who made the most lavish promises imaginable. Government would be reduced by a quarter! Shutdowns would happen! The nation would be saved by transformational change! As Steven Bilakovics writes in his book “Democracy Without Politics,” “even as we expect ever less of democracy we apparently expect ever more from democracy.”


This anti-political political ethos produced elected leaders of jaw-dropping incompetence. Running a government is a craft, like carpentry. But the new Republican officials did not believe in government and so did not respect its traditions, its disciplines and its craftsmanship. They do not accept the hierarchical structures of authority inherent in political activity.

In his masterwork, “Politics as a Vocation,” Max Weber argues that the pre-eminent qualities for a politician are passion, a feeling of responsibility and a sense of proportion. A politician needs warm passion to impel action but a cool sense of responsibility and proportion to make careful decisions in a complex landscape.

If a politician lacks the quality of detachment — the ability to let the difficult facts of reality work their way into the mind — then, Weber argues, the politician ends up striving for the “boastful but entirely empty gesture.” His work “leads nowhere and is senseless.”

Welcome to Ted Cruz, Donald Trump and the Freedom Caucus.

Really, have we ever seen bumbling on this scale, people at once so cynical and so naïve, so willfully ignorant in using levers of power to produce some tangible if incremental good? These insurgents can’t even acknowledge democracy’s legitimacy — if you can’t persuade a majority of your colleagues, maybe you should accept their position. You might be wrong!
People who don’t accept democracy will be bad at conversation. They won’t respect tradition, institutions or precedent. These figures are masters at destruction but incompetent at construction.

These insurgents are incompetent at governing and unwilling to be governed. But they are not a spontaneous growth. It took a thousand small betrayals of conservatism to get to the dysfunction we see all around. Originally Posted by timpage

He is trying to salvage being a loser in the fifty year battle to prevent real conservatives from ruling the party. Up until now, pussies like him have given into every liberal demand, and the country has gone to shit. just because you want your opponents to remain emasculated doesn't mean they need to do things your way, faggot.

David Brooks--That first encounter is still vivid in Brooks’s mind. “I remember distinctly an image of–we were sitting on his couches, and I was looking at his pant leg and his perfectly creased pant,” Brooks says, “and I’m thinking, a) he’s going to be president and b) he’ll be a very good president.” In the fall of 2006, two days after Obama’s The Audacity of Hope hit bookstores, Brooks published a glowing Times column. The headline was “Run, Barack, Run.”…

Pretty much says it all about Brooks. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

Link ?

and even if i had you on ignore your tittie avatar would still be visible. that's your only positive contribution here. and since you "claim" to have me on ignore you won't mind if i call you a

FAGGOT
i mean, you'll never know right?



Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

You will never surpass gay rey as the biggest faggot on the forum, but thanks for trying.

You will never surpass gay rey as the biggest faggot on the forum, but thanks for trying. Originally Posted by i'va biggen

C'mon Gay Rey, share with us your patented "giant sucking sound."

Let me guess, Ross Perot reeled you in 1992 when he referred to the "giant sucking sound."

Gay Rey thought Perot was talking about him!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giant_sucking_sound

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner...mark-krikorian

http://hotair.com/archives/2009/08/3...as-pants-post/

http://www.newrepublic.com/article/p.../the-courtship

C'mon Gay Rey, share with us your patented "giant sucking sound."

Let me guess, Ross Perot reeled you in 1992 when he referred to the "giant sucking sound."

Gay Rey thought Perot was talking about him!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giant_sucking_sound Originally Posted by bigtex

No. Perot didn't get me. But Slick Willy the convicted sexual predator and DISBARRED LIE-yer from Arkansas that you'd give a reach around to in a heart beat sure got you to SWALLOW his hook. And YOU and woomby sure would like to SWALLOW more of his junk and baby batter !

You will never surpass gay rey as the biggest faggot on the forum, but thanks for trying. Originally Posted by i'va biggen

So woomby has YOU denying YOUR gayness and using transference JUST LIKE HIM . Is that part of your training to run his gloryhole franchises over there in Kans-ASS ? How are YOUR rusty trombone lessons with him going, EKIM ? Are you playing your and woomby's favorite song " Macho Man " yet ? Lil cotex likes the Village People too, so maybe he'll buy some of YOUR "music" when you get proficient with it !

Europe... the muslam0-savages you don't want... 0zombie King Bronco Bama will gladly inflict upon the people of the USA...

How exactly did ANYONE drop the debt? It's over 18 TRILLION that they REPORT. I'm getting kind of concerned about you guys.

OH and no the Fing repukes (I disavow republicans, and I just plain don't usually like dems) havent done shit except betray and steal. Oh wait.... that's a politician thing.

And gutting dems out will do nothing. You have to replace all the top muzzies that oboma has put in power. We are supposed to be Americans. Why the hell can't we work together. The muzzie shit is bad. Really bad. Do we agree with that? I think there has been only 1 shooting in the last couple years that wasn't done by a muzzie. What's worse is trying to blame white or christians. Why would anyone TRY TO BLAME without all the facts yet? Conspiracy theory? I think not. Originally Posted by LovingKayla

You're confusing debt with deficit...