MR.WONDERFUL! How bout Mr. Awful!!! Providers and Clients must read!

So modTards....can you investigate if these two accounts are the same guy?

texanfan http://www.eccie.net/member.php?u=123027

MrWonderfull http://www.eccie.net/member.php?u=292070 Originally Posted by GlobeSpotter
I have been tracking this character for years.

To be clear...texanfan is his P411 messaging name...not eccie name.
From my communications with him on both P411 and eccie, I absolutely know for sure that p411 texanfan is the same guy.

I've never communicated with the eccie guy named texanfan.

My post from November 2015 bears repeating http://eccie.net/showthread.php?p=1057403927

----> 67 aka lovable aka theniceguy aka letsplai aka MrWonderfull

Ladies. If he reaches out to you on P411....respond to him in P411 messaging that you do not want him to contact you in any way...p411, eccie, email, or text.
He must cease and desist immediately. If he doesn't...then report him to P411.
With enough reports he will lose his P411 account and no longer be able to dupe ladies with all his OKs.

- Lady Jane
Thank you Eden Courtesans
good looking out....smile
I just wish this discussion could have been had in a lady's only area.
it irritates me that basically it wasn't a problem till he wrote a review and from my understanding he basically robbed and tried to violate/cross some important boundaries with
ElleAnaOfHouston yet that wasn't a big enough issue for her to let anyone know ...but a false statement in a review has her upset enough to start a thread....
He's a strange one indeed..

Seems to be getting off more from all the negative attention he gets
Um.....am I the only one who noticed she posted his P411 handle publicly????

Not the long ID, but still his handle. Is this allowed? News to me if it is.

I always PM P411 okays as well, asking for a reference; I do not take anything for granted when it comes to screening.

I also ask P411 gents if they have an eccie handle as well. Of course they could always lie and say no, but it still helps.
Not to mention, am I missing something?

Here is the review: http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=1733299

Granted I can't see the ROS, but it doesn't look like anything rude, mean, or out of the ordinary and he even gave a "yes".

I'm confused about the issue with the review......
You can't see ROS that's why..even though some WK revealed what all the fuss is about... And mods didn't bother to put tags on the content

If someone was to review you and mention activities not on your menu, how would you feel?

A Yes review that makes clients flood your pm box with requests of a service you don't provide will piss you off just the same
You can't see ROS that's why..

If someone was to review you and mention activities not on your menu, how would you feel?

A Yes review that makes clients flood your pm box with requests of a service you don't provide will piss you off just the same Originally Posted by NubianPrince
Agreed and understood....I was making a point that it seems the provider in question does somehow have access to the ROS. Or perhaps she is just clever enough to put 2 & 2 together.

I'm the first one to side with a provider over a hobbyist by default; however, I agree with the points Isabel brought up about not doing her part and reporting this issue in a more proper manner.

I feel this should have been kept in the ladies room and not made public.
Read the review again...not all the info is in ROS

Some WK spilled the beans
Read the review again...not all the info is in ROS

Some WK spilled the beans Originally Posted by NubianPrince
Do you mean the "good to know" and "well, ok then" comments? Bc that is all I (and any provider should be able to) can see.

From simply reading that, it may have been slightly apparent that something was said in the ros, but not entirely apparent.

Now, she comes in co-ed and broadcasts it to everyone; ok, now I (and others) can figure it out more.

I've said before that sometimes getting one "no" or unfair/untrue review doesn't have to be the end of the world, but by posting in co-ed you bring a huge amount of attention to something that may have otherwise, largely gone unnoticed.

It just comes down to a difference between how some ladies chose to handle certain situations versus how others do.

Anywhos, it's no skin off my back. It's her life, her rep, and her business; she can chose to run it in whatever way seems best to her.
seriously??

http://www.eccie.net/showpost.php?p=...8&postcount=17
seriously??

http://www.eccie.net/showpost.php?p=...8&postcount=17 Originally Posted by NubianPrince
Touché; I didn't see it somehow the first time? Don't crucify me, lols.

I'll rescind my one comment then about not seeing what is wrong with this review, but I'll stick with my opinions on how best to handle such situations.

That's just me though, and how I would handle something like this if it happened to me.
NubianPrince I agree with you it would feel like crap to have someone say you engage in certain activities that you do not and have to deal with clients expecting activities that you do not provide.

However I would respect
ElleAnaOfHouston alot more if she made a thread for you gentleman and had said something along the lines of...hey guys just wanted to let yall know that recently there was a review stating that I do bbf's. I don't do bbf's (and then posted a bunch of taint pictures)
When she made this thread only after the review it rubs me the wrong way! The things that she says (and I believe her) went on in that session are pretty serious and I find it really selfish that the only reason any of us lady's are being alerted about this is cause she didn't like what was wrote about her in a review! I really want to know if she gave him an OK
NubianPrince I agree with you it would feel like crap to have someone say you engage in certain activities that you do not and have to deal with clients expecting activities that you do not provide.

However I would respect
ElleAnaOfHouston alot more if she made a thread for you gentleman and had said something along the lines of...hey guys just wanted to let yall know that recently there was a review stating that I do bbf's. I don't do bbf's (and then posted a bunch of taint pictures)
 Originally Posted by isabelisthe1
According to ElleAnna the bbfs didn't happen...she made him suit up
He didn't force bbfs or tried to slip the condom off
Trying to convince her to go bare wasn't alert worthy..

Nobody mentioned bbfs in the review(in the open) til June 3rd..2 days after the review was posted
I'm assuming she caught wind of the allegations after a WK told her or clients started requesting the same service

Her rebuttal concerning the bbfs was right on time imho


Now if you're talking about being shorted and the guy practically stalking her and managing to get around screening... u have a point there

Maybe she was too busy to share that information with you ladies
I think what was alarm worthy is when she said that the client told her who he really was on eccie
And when he kept trying to sneak in his bare banana
And when he didn't give her, her full donation.
Yea she might have been to busy to share that important info she is also to busy to answer reference request...yet she has time to ask for them...I just think she should have left out the actual alert part and just say what she wanted to say...she doesn't do bbf's