A Patriot stands up

That's awesome... FUCK them ShitHeads! Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB

You can bet that if a conservative burned a rainbow flag of the LGBT crowd ( and one like womb-as-big-as-a-house proudly flies under the bridge ) the conservative would be throw in jail for a " hate crime " .

Okay, we've firmly established that you did not watch the video and you're just shooting off your ignorant mouth again. Ms (that means she's female you transgender bitch) Manhart did not attack anyone. Nor did she call anyone foul names. Nor did she threaten anyone. She was verbally assaulted (that's assault), she was threatened (that's making threats), and she was grabbed, forced to her knees and cuffed (or what you probably call Saturday night). The police are not in charge of free speech or even what constitutes free speech. They are to worry about crime and what the students were doing was a crime.
President William J. McKinney should investigate what these students are being taught about history, the Constitution, and political science. Failing to do that, McKinney should be removed from office (but it looks like he is already on the way out) by the Board of Regents. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

McKinney will probably have Berkley, Harvard, Columbia and all the rest of the Liberal " Institutions of ' Higher Learning' " ( Read, Communist indoctrination: Big LIBERAL government GOOD !!) falling all over themselves to hire him. He's just their kind of administrator !

Free speech allows one person to verbally attack another who is exercising their right to free speech. It does NOT allow the government to restrict what speech is allowed. I oppose flag burning, but in a political context, it's free speech and not subject to restrictions by government, except time, place and manner as necessary for safety. The government can restrict flag burning at gas pumps, but that's not a content based restriction. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

CuteOldGuy has wisdom and I see that. Hey, I voted for Obama because I wantd more social democracy. Now, I believe his election was bought and paid for by the healthcare insurance industry. Look at the tables! Too much of taxpayer money going toward Obamacare. Obamacare is a total disaster, in no uncertain words. Why do not we have national healthcare, without intervention by insurance companies, which is much cheaper and much more practical. These special interest groups are running the whitehouse and leaders there are mostly puppets.

I have to disagree about one woman who I admire greatly. . .Elizabeth Warren. . .a woman of the people, by the people, and for the people! Run, Liz, run!!!

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/miles-...b_6319142.html

We need you!

CuteOldGuy has wisdom and I see that. Hey, I voted for Obama because I wantd more social democracy. Now, I believe his election was bought and paid for by the healthcare insurance industry. Look at the tables! Too much of taxpayer money going toward Obamacare. Obamacare is a total disaster, in no uncertain words. Why do not we have national healthcare, without intervention by insurance companies, which is much cheaper and much more practical. These special interest groups are running the whitehouse and leaders there are mostly puppets.

I have to disagree about one woman who I admire greatly. . .Elizabeth Warren. . .a woman of the people, by the people, and for the people! Run, Liz, run!!!

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/miles-...b_6319142.html

We need you! Originally Posted by SeekingTruth

Greed.

You can bet that if a conservative burned a rainbow flag of the LGBT crowd ( and one like womb-as-big-as-a-house proudly flies under the bridge ) the conservative would be throw in jail for a " hate crime " . Originally Posted by Rey Lengua

McKinney will probably have Berkley, Harvard, Columbia and all the rest of the Liberal " Institutions of ' Higher Learning' " ( Read, Communist indoctrination: Big LIBERAL government GOOD !!) falling all over themselves to hire him. He's just their kind of administrator ! Originally Posted by Rey Lengua

I wonder how many more republican, fox news tropes you can use in two posts. Let's see; deny gays any rights? Check. Colleges are indoctrination centers? Check. Mention communism, because that's scary? Check.

You know, your buddy Tom Cotton went to Harvard. Does he seem indoctrinated to you? Of course he's the Koch Brothers' bitch now. Anyway, it all boils down to fear with someone like you. You fear the unknown, which in your case, is a lot of things.

Why would someone burn a rainbow flag? I know why a conservative would burn one, but just your average american, why would they burn one?

but just your average american, why would they burn one? Originally Posted by WombRaider

For the same reason your "average American" would burn the US flag. I.E. only radical protesters would do that... not your average American.

Or is this where you try and convince everyone that the folks at that protest walking on the flag were just your everyday, average americans?

Seeing as how the burning of the flag is protected free speech, then yeah, it makes perfect sense. You can be against it all you want, but it is a first amendment right, protected and decided by SCOTUS. Originally Posted by WombRaider

So, because it is protected free speech those who still oppose it give up the right to express themselves without being called anti-American? It really seems like it should work both ways. If anything, it is pro-American to petition for redress of a law you feel is unjust.

Actually, the heading should be "Only in America". Try that in China! Try getting in the face of the police like they all did in Soviet Union. How about disrespecting anything considered righteous in a Muslim Country. Where else do we all have the Constitutional right and freedom to be stupid, rude, obnoxious, and even down right stupid? What a country!
That being said, I liked what she did, and wished she was a provider. But, that's just me!!!!

For the same reason your "average American" would burn the US flag. I.E. only radical protesters would do that... not your average American.

Or is this where you try and convince everyone that the folks at that protest walking on the flag were just your everyday, average americans? Originally Posted by RedLeg505

How do you know where the edge is... if you never check it out?

So, because it is protected free speech those who still oppose it give up the right to express themselves without being called anti-American? It really seems like it should work both ways. If anything, it is pro-American to petition for redress of a law you feel is unjust. Originally Posted by DSK

Did I say that?

Actually, the heading should be "Only in America". Try that in China! Try getting in the face of the police like they all did in Soviet Union. How about disrespecting anything considered righteous in a Muslim Country. Where else do we all have the Constitutional right and freedom to be stupid, rude, obnoxious, and even down right stupid? What a country!
That being said, I liked what she did, and wished she was a provider. But, that's just me!!!! Originally Posted by Hermosa

Exactly. And yet, some on here would claim that our country is in some kind of trouble and that our freedoms are being eroded. What other country would allow this?

I thought she was a he according to you baby killer. Free speech? It is still the law that you can't do it. Care to prove how many of those idiots were actually thinking about free speech. That video doesn't make that case. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

Are you advocating for Thought Police, JD?

*UPDATE* Follow Up: We Expose The VSU “Protest Group” Marching On Flag… *UPDATE* Identified Group was armed, University Alert, Police Now Seeking Suspect Eric Sheppard Jr.

UPDATE: Since we exposed the individual(s) and group, VSU has now issued an alert. Apparently the group was armed during the event, and the primary agitator is to be considered “armed and dangerous”:

... http://theconservativetreehouse.com/...ag/#more-99729

That boy has a nice mooslum beard...

CuteOldGuy has wisdom and I see that. Hey, I voted for Obama because I wantd more social democracy. Now, I believe his election was bought and paid for by the healthcare insurance industry. Look at the tables! Too much of taxpayer money going toward Obamacare. Obamacare is a total disaster, in no uncertain words. Why do not we have national healthcare, without intervention by insurance companies, which is much cheaper and much more practical. These special interest groups are running the whitehouse and leaders there are mostly puppets.

I have to disagree about one woman who I admire greatly. . .Elizabeth Warren. . .a woman of the people, by the people, and for the people! Run, Liz, run!!!

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/miles-...b_6319142.html

We need you! Originally Posted by SeekingTruth

Here is your insurmountable problem, the people who tried to warn you about Obama (and you didn't listen) are now trying to warn you about Warren. Your judgement is flawed, you voted for Obama. Why not listen to those who got it right the last time instead of yourself?

CuteOldGuy has wisdom and I see that. Hey, I voted for Obama because I wantd more social democracy. Now, I believe his election was bought and paid for by the healthcare insurance industry. Look at the tables! Too much of taxpayer money going toward Obamacare. Obamacare is a total disaster, in no uncertain words. Why do not we have national healthcare, without intervention by insurance companies, which is much cheaper and much more practical. These special interest groups are running the whitehouse and leaders there are mostly puppets.

I have to disagree about one woman who I admire greatly. . .Elizabeth Warren. . .a woman of the people, by the people, and for the people! Run, Liz, run!!!

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/miles-...b_6319142.html

We need you! Originally Posted by SeekingTruth

You entire argument is riddled with contradictions. You opine you want a national healthcare system, then you whine about Obama implementing the closest thing we've ever had to a national healthcare system. It took his administration years to reach a passable solution. And still the Republicans are trying to repeal Obamacare based on their notion that it limits the free-market healthcare system provided by private companies. Obamacare is about as close as we've ever been(or might ever be) to a national healthcare system.
Besides, all facts indicate that healthcare profit margins have gone up only slightly, which is expected since insurance coverage is now mandatory. I don't see how this has anything to do with Obama being paid for by the healthcare companies. If anything then, in that case Obama should have completely privatized healthcare so that insurance companies could charge what they want and raise the risk rate so that people with debilitating diseases could be denied coverage (as they were, previously). None of what you said makes any sense.