Well good for you! Really. I'm sure they enjoyed you. At least we can tell ourselves that. LOL You know the IOP. But I'm sure your huge cock impressed them sooo much that they didn't have to pretend at all. Did they? Keep dreaming. Just glad that was cum and not pus shooting out your cock. LOL I could care less, dude. A cock's a cock, black/white or in between.
I'm not here to do anything but point out facts. Yes that was from 2000 (another poster pointed out). The stats currently on young AA with STD's are a bit higher currently. I'd have to look at it again but it was something like between 5,000% to 6,000% higher rate of incident of STD's among AA's than the average, if you add all of STD's. That's what we call in the biz a "statistically significant figure", LMAO! It's a fact. Look it up on CDC. The previous link was, I think, only talking about gonorrhea which was 3,000% higher incident (that means 30 times the rate for the less informed) among AA's. You add warts chlamydia, syphilis, crabs, herpes, etc... the number skyrockets. Be my guest, look it up.
I think it's something the ladies need to be aware of. Just sayin'.
Originally Posted by Muscleup
Statistically speaking, there are myriad biases in these research studies from a pure methodology aspect. Geographical location, education, socio-economic status, etc.....Sampling is not always reflective of the population. You have to assess where the data is coming from (std clinics? These are readily available in poor areas that are heavily populated by blacks. Bottom line, the statistical significance can not be substantiated by someone who is not directly involved in the research study. Furthermore, the target audience has a lot to do with it as well. I would imagine the poor and uneducated to have higher rates if std's due to the fact that many are uninformed, cannot afford proper healthcare, etc.....the privileged can and has the ability to keep things like this anonymous and they have the ability to manage it better as well. There are many factors that could skew data, so you have to take everything with a grain of salt.
Additionally, I think you are right, it's probably less about the actual physical penis than it appears to be. I think it's more of the persona/swagger of the black man that some may have an affinity for. We can be perceived at times as less arrogant yet strong, stoic, and loving amongst other things. Contrarily, we can be perceived as thugs and so on. Hell, preference seems to be a word of choice around here. So if some have a preference for it, and some don't have a preference for it, who cares? Just make sure you Marvin Gaye and get it on with the wonderful ladies of your choosing. Hobby on, and be safe my friend!
Also, I find it quite laughable that you think the ladies would not be informed unless you pointed it out. That article has been referenced multiple times on this board. Unlike you, I am quite sure these ladies can read and can educate themselves on the matter without having a Sir Lance-a-lot such as yourself providing them a charitable contribution of knowledge from your repository. I guess when you have a preconceived notion about groups and classes of people, it's difficult to see too far beyond your own nose and you would think these "working gals" don't have that capacity. I apologize if that's not what you meant but it certainly looks that way.
