WTF are you talking about? Leading Report was referring to Nate Silvers EC model. DUH. SMH
How does MSN grab you Eye?
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/polit...ng/ar-AA1qFzFg
How many times are you going to be absolutely wrong? Originally Posted by eyecu2
FiveThirtyEight, the handicapping outlet Silver founded in 2008 and left earlier this year, seems to see a more heated contest unfolding, giving Harris a 56% chance of winning and Trump a 43% chance. Likewise, DecisionDeskHQ’s current model gives Harris a 54% chance of winning the presidency.
Further--
Social media users have criticized his employment at Polymarket, a political betting site that has received significant investment from conservative billionaire Peter Thiel, who has personal and professional connections to the Republican vice presidential nominee, J.D. Vance. He’s also received praise from Trump himself, which probably hasn’t helped the perception that his forecast is biased toward Republicans.
Apparently you didn't read the content which is contested by all cept the political betting communities that Silver now serves.
Pretty sure it's a case of not biting the hand that feeds him. It's silvers conclusions that are not based on any modelling vs. Trying to create a self fulfilling conclusion.
If you poll it they will vote it mentality, won't win any election.
Doesn't that make you pause and say, I wonder why he would be a total outsider of the 538 community since LEAVING 538??