Biological Male Boxers Fighting Women In The Olympics.

HoHound's Avatar
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/202...-imane-khelif/

Democrats have been advocating fake trannies in women’s sports for about a decade now and they know it. Yet, Democrats on this forum deny their culpability entirely . Why? I just don’t understand. Someone help me out.
HoHound's Avatar
Democrats have been advocating fake trannies in women's sports for about a decade now. They need to stop pretending otherwise. You can't solve a problem until you admit the problem.
TechPapi's Avatar
LOL. The OP must have a real need for attention. Ah, those EVIL democrats and the IOC. They're so crafty and corrupt that they brought a transsexual from Algeria (illegal and punishable by death) to compete in the Olympics. Does the OP think that Algeria is now the defender of woke culture? I'm unsure if we should pity the OP for believing this foolishness or accept they are simply trolls. I don't understand the fever brained connection to democrats, but hey, I'm not obsessed with trannies and democrats. I suspect he just wants to be pegged by Imane Khelif.


For people who know how to read, I offer the statement from the IOC.

Joint Paris 2024 Boxing Unit/IOC Statement

Every person has the right to practise sport without discrimination.

All athletes participating in the boxing tournament of the Olympic Games Paris 2024 comply with the competition's eligibility and entry regulations, as well as all applicable medical regulations set by the Paris 2024 Boxing Unit (PBU) (please find all applicable rules here). As with previous Olympic boxing competitions, the gender and age of the athletes are based on their passport.

These rules also applied during the qualification period, including the boxing tournaments of the 2023 European Games, Asian Games, Pan American Games and Pacific Games, the ad hoc 2023 African qualifying tournament in Dakar (SEN) and two world qualifying tournaments held in Busto Arsizio (ITA) and Bangkok (THA) in 2024, which involved a total of 1,471 different boxers from 172 National Olympic Committees (NOCs), the Boxing Refugee Team and Individual Neutral Athletes, and featured over 2,000 qualification bouts.

The PBU used the Tokyo 2020 boxing rules as a baseline to develop its regulations for Paris 2024. This was to minimise the impact on athletes' preparations and guarantee consistency between Olympic Games. These Tokyo 2020 rules were based on the post-Rio 2016 rules, which were in place before the suspension of the boxing International Federation by the IOC in 2019 and the subsequent withdrawal of its recognition in 2023.

We have seen in reports misleading information about two female athletes competing at the Olympic Games Paris 2024. The two athletes have been competing in international boxing competitions for many years in the women's category, including the Olympic Games Tokyo 2020, International Boxing Association (IBA) World Championships and IBA-sanctioned tournaments.

These two athletes were the victims of a sudden and arbitrary decision by the IBA. Towards the end of the IBA World Championships in 2023, they were suddenly disqualified without any due process.

According to the IBA minutes available on their website, this decision was initially taken solely by the IBA Secretary General and CEO. The IBA Board only ratified it afterwards and only subsequently requested that a procedure to follow in similar cases in the future be established and reflected in the IBA Regulations. The minutes also say that the IBA should "establish a clear procedure on gender testing".

The current aggression against these two athletes is based entirely on this arbitrary decision, which was taken without any proper procedure – especially considering that these athletes had been competing in top-level competition for many years.

Such an approach is contrary to good governance.

Eligibility rules should not be changed during ongoing competition, and any rule change must follow appropriate processes and should be based on scientific evidence.

The IOC is committed to protecting the human rights of all athletes participating in the Olympic Games as per the Olympic Charter, the IOC Code of Ethics and the IOC Strategic Framework on Human Rights. The IOC is saddened by the abuse that the two athletes are currently receiving.

The IBA's recognition was withdrawn by the IOC in 2023 following its suspension in 2019. The withdrawal of recognition was confirmed by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS). See the IOC's statement following the ruling.

The IOC has made it clear that it needs National Boxing Federations to reach a consensus around a new International Federation in order for boxing to be included on the sports programme of the Olympic Games LA28.
txdot-guy's Avatar
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/202...-imane-khelif/

Democrats have been advocating fake trannies in women’s sports for about a decade now and they know it. Yet, Democrats on this forum deny their culpability entirely . Why? I just don’t understand. Someone help me out. Originally Posted by HoHound
Why is this still being posted in the political forum. This is not a political topic.

The number of repeat posts says more about the OP than the actual topic.
Why is this still being posted in the political forum. This is not a political topic. Originally Posted by txdot-guy
I agree.

If women want to put up with this non sense, let them. It
txdot-guy's Avatar
Democrats have been advocating fake trannies in women's sports for about a decade now. They need to stop pretending otherwise. You can't solve a problem until you admit the problem. Originally Posted by HoHound
Democrats have been advocating for acceptance and inclusion for decades. It includes a number of different people including the transgender community.

That has nothing to do with the current topic. You keep saying that this is a republican / democratic issue but it’s not. This is about the beef between the IOC and the IBA.

If you want to discuss transgender issues why don’t you open a thread in the “Another Realm” forum.
Precious_b's Avatar
It is unbelievable out of over 10000 athletes at the 2024 games, there is one, maybe 2, that are in question. Magas are making this out to be some huge problem, kind of like 2 dead people voting and it becomes some huge talking point. And these 2 ended up being Republican dead voters anyway. Magats lack critical thinking skills and just follow their cult leader anyway they can.

To break this down. 1 in 10000 is like .01% of the athletes. 100th of 1%... Jesus H fucking christ give it a rest.
biomed1's Avatar
As Noted previously the issue is a Sporting or Olympics issue not a Political one.

Members are encouraged to post threads on this topic in the correct forum.
HDGristle's Avatar
Ducbutter's Avatar
It is unbelievable out of over 10000 athletes at the 2024 games, there is one, maybe 2, that are in question. Magas are making this out to be some huge problem, kind of like 2 dead people voting and it becomes some huge talking point. And these 2 ended up being Republican dead voters anyway. Magats lack critical thinking skills and just follow their cult leader anyway they can.

To break this down. 1 in 10000 is like .01% of the athletes. 100th of 1%... Jesus H fucking christ give it a rest. Originally Posted by royamcr
It's worth noting that the % .01 is what the typical percentage of truly transexual folks in society has historically been, if memory serves. However, I would argue that the more important stat is that every natural female competitor in the trans person's chosen sport is at a disadvantage to said trans competitor. 100%
Ducbutter's Avatar
Interesting article

https://thednaexchange.com/author/geneticobserver/ Originally Posted by HDGristle
Agenda driven garbage from an ideologically captured university.
From their "House Rules" page,
"The opinions expressed on this blog are strictly those of the individual authors," and "We are not medical doctors, "

Read Deborah Soh, a doctor of evolutionary biology.
HDGristle's Avatar
What specifically did you disagree with? Why?

Less interested in the ad hominem attacks on the university he went to, or the author's credentials or that it's an opinion piece. I knew those when I posted it.

Focus on the history presented and the content of the discussion.
txdot-guy's Avatar
It's worth noting that the % .01 is what the typical percentage of truly transexual folks in society has historically been, if memory serves. However, I would argue that the more important stat is that every natural female competitor in the trans person's chosen sport is at a disadvantage to said trans competitor. 100% Originally Posted by Ducbutter
In another time before chromosome testing these athletes would be given a pass because they have female genitalia. It’s not like these women are trying to cheat the system. They were born girls, raised as women and are just trying to compete as the sex they were raised with.

Biology doesn’t just mean sex determination. It also has to do with reach, height, weight, oxygen efficiency, etc. etc.
Ducbutter's Avatar
What specifically did you disagree with? Why?

Less interested in the ad hominem attacks on the university he went to, or the author's credentials or that it's an opinion piece. I knew those when I posted it.

Focus on the history presented and the content of the discussion. Originally Posted by HDGristle
When the article says stuff like this, "The problem is that biological sex is more of a spectrum than a duality." it is denying the biological realities of mammalian reproduction and can't be taken seriously.

Follow the link to learn about the science of sex/gender:

https://www.nas.org/academic-questio...-and-immutable