How much will you tolerate?

WTF's Avatar
  • WTF
  • 02-24-2013, 12:46 AM

I don't know what you boys are smoking but it seems like it is pretty harsh. Why do you think they call it dope?
Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn
Don't you have some hot young hooker to go fuc?


JD Barleycorn's Avatar
Been there and done that. About three hours ago actually.
What was his name? Going to do a review?
Doove's Avatar
  • Doove
  • 02-24-2013, 05:41 AM
I have asked this before. How much crap from this administration will you take. What would make you condemn this buffoon? Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn
Tell ya what. When 3000 Americans are killed in a terrorist attack on US soil, when another 1000 or more die in a hurricane, when we start a multi-trillion dollar war for reasons that don't exist, and when the economy starts shedding 800,000 jobs a month for 6 months running, we'll talk.
JD Barleycorn's Avatar
So that is your standard? Can we confirm that? Nothing about usurping constiutional authority, no mention of illegal acts, no concerns about giving up secrets to our enemies, not a thought about killing Americans without due process? Is that your standard Doove? Can we carve that in stone? That when a president has the bad luck of having a hurricane hitting in a place that was occupied and knew that a hit would be disastor like the Galveston Hurricane that killed over 12,000 people you will be upset. That when a country attacks the US because of repeated failures and coverups by previous administrations like Pearl Harbor then you will be upset. That when the economy starts shedding jobs like under Hoover and FDR then you will be concerned. Since we have ONLY spent an estimated 1.2 trillion dollars on two wars then your comment is just shit I won't respond until you correct your numbers. Just remember Cuba, Philippines, Bosnia, Korea, and Panama. They were all "voluntary".

Don't post stupid!
Doove's Avatar
  • Doove
  • 02-24-2013, 10:02 AM
So that is your standard? Can we confirm that? Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn
When you insist on talking about complete and utter disasters, yeah, that's pretty much where we'll start.

Nothing about usurping constiutional authority, no mention of illegal acts, no concerns about giving up secrets to our enemies, not a thought about killing Americans without due process? Is that your standard Doove?
If and when the courts tell him he can't do that, i'm sure he'll stop. Until then, all your ramblings are about little more than another day in the life of being President. From Washington on down.
WTF's Avatar
  • WTF
  • 02-24-2013, 10:10 AM
What was his name? Going to do a review? Originally Posted by i'va biggen
JD must meet his own standard and prove that it wasn't a male.
I B Hankering's Avatar
For a change, IBRunning&Hiding isn't making any claims, just cutting and pasting bullshit from another "hard" Tea Party blog.

http://www.eccie.net/showpost.php?p=...5&postcount=11

The NCRenegade bills itself as a blog for "Opinions and Commentary for the Hard Tea Party"

I suppose that says it all. But IBRunning&Hiding doesn't.

Do you have an opinion or just a Google search bar on your browser, IBRunning&Hiding?

You want to bet your reputation on the credibility of the NCRenegade, with a Twitter following of less than 500 people? What a silly question! Of course you do. They've Tweeted less than a third as many times as you've posted on ECCIE!

While you're planning your next barrage of repetitive insults, why don't you check out the incredible values in the "Survival Store?"

And maybe you and your pals can jump under the bandwagon on this, also a prominent part of NCRenegade!
Safety and Preparedness

NC Renegade encourages everyone to become self sufficient and continue education in all forms of safety and preparedness. The best overall site for this topic is Survival Blog by James Wesley Rawles. We strongly encourage you to visit this site and take advantage of its broad knowledge base.
I'm guessing they speak for you, eh, IBRunning&Hiding? Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
For all of your ignorant blathering, Assup the jackass, it's quite evident you didn't refute the fact that the stock market has yet to return to its earlier, higher level when you factor in inflation.
I wonder if the goverment moniters any of the shit that is said on this board
I B Hankering's Avatar
I wonder if the goverment moniters any of the shit that is said on this board Originally Posted by gary5912
No need to "wonder": you can count on it!
If so bunker up the drones are coming, Better than the sky is falling. Or maybe the same ..LOL
You really are an ignoramus, Drag Queen. You post your links as Twitter hash tags. Do you understand how to make this chit easy to find?

Or do you want people to read everything being said at this hash tag? Doesn't really support your point of view.

Nor does emailing David Burge, but what the hell! Nobody has any great expectations from you anyway.

Or is the whole point of your Iowa fixation that we won't be able to read the prognostications of this award winning soothsayer? Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
David Burge ‏@iowahawkblog
Boo-F***ing-Hoo http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/as-furloughs-loom-unions-try-to-soften-sequester-blow-for-federal-workers/2013/02/22/3c3a4204-7c65-11e2-82e8-61a46c2cde3d_story.html …
Chica Chaser's Avatar
They want guarantees that no one will be penalized when work does not get done and assurances that managers cannot choose favorites to spare.
Guarantees? LOL!

This would be the first time that furloughs across the federal government would occur with no chance that lost pay would be recovered
Welcome to the real world

And everyone from secretaries to senior executives would be hit, except for about 2,000 senior, presidentially appointed officials in the government
I'm shocked!
JD Barleycorn's Avatar
Now Doove to clarify if a natural disastor, NATURAL disastor only kills 700 people then you won't worry about the competency of the POTUS. I still fail to see how that is relevant to this discussion. Not supporting your people in the field is more like something to discuss. You know like Afghanistan, Iraq, Oman, Yemen, and Libya. Okay you get the willies if a POTUS sends troops to fight an enemy after they have attacked us but it is okay to send assets (like drones) into other countries which may or may not be out allies to kill people without due process or just the Americans or their children. One bothers you but the other doesn't. Okay, good to know. So a terrorist act against this country has to kill at least 3000 people to get your attention. No wonder Clinton did nothing about the USS Cole, the African embassies, the CIA officers in Langley, or the political rabbi in New York City. Your attitude explains a lot about how democrats are reacting to terrorism. Good to know...
Munchmasterman's Avatar
I have asked this before. How much crap from this administration will you take. What would make you condemn this buffoon? Four dead Americans sacrificed in Libya didn't do it. Ruining out military is not doing it. How about a hypothetical; what if you found out that the White House was assisting in a transfer of ultra technology to a foreign power that was not necessarily our friend? Would that make your blood boil knowing that people were willing to sacrifice our military men and women for politics or money? I would really like to know. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn
Nothing new here. Just the same old douche-bag.

I bet you guys are fun in prison. They shove it in and you just accept it. A couple of you would ask for seconds I think. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn
Why do you really want to know? Let me rephrase that. Why do you pretend to listen to others when all you want to do is swap your prison rape stories?
You received valid replies to your “earnest” question and out comes the ol’ jd (master)bait and switch move.

Everyone hates you where you work, don’t they? They see you as an example of affirmative action gone bad. You can’t do or teach, but because you are a veteran, they kept a qualified teach out of work to use you as a tax break. A tax break that takes it in the ass. You are obviously a inverted conservative that flies into a rage when others display your character traits. As you should.
You have it in your power to remove one of those flaming ass douche-bags. Do it. Stop following and lead by example.

Kill yourself.