Biden's idolators would do well to take a holistic look at the economic landscape before celebrating what apparently seems to them like the best unemployment picture since the 1950s, although the number isn't as good as it looks and is unlikely to be remotely sustainable. (You wouldn't want to look like the metaphorical equivalent of the wide receiver who spiked the ball on the 5-yard line!)
First, note that the labor force participation rate took a tumble, as Tiny stated. That alone drove the headline unemployment rate down quite a few tens of bips lower than would otherwise be the case.
Then go back and take a look at the link I posted in #7. Here it is:
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/UNRATE
Notice what happened every time the unemployment rate declined to cycle lows? That's right -- a recession and rapidly rising unemployment rate soon followed!
For instance, the unemployment rate dipped to 3.5% at the end of the go-go 1960s, in December 1969. But a recession incepted that very month, and 12 months later the unemployment rate stood at 6.1%, as the graph shows. (And that was actually a pretty mild recession!)
Let's see ...
A 500-bip increase in the Fed funds target rate. The rate on 30-year fixed rate mortgages rising from sub-3% territory to around 6.5% in less than two years. The looming specter of a cascade of CRE mortgage defaults as rates reset. A credit contraction underway as there's growing angst over regional bank balance sheets as asset portfolio losses become more and more widespread. The inexorable wind-down of the massive pool of "excess savings" poured into household accounts by trillions of dollars of covid relief/stimulus. And the list goes on and on.
So, what sort of economic news do you think comes next in the hit parade? The vaunted "soft landing"? (Good luck with that!)
Now we're seeing the triumph of hope over experience