The "fact" that jayhawks is a terrorist name is only correct in one context - the pro-slavery factions in Missouruh who did not want Kansas to enter the Union as a free state. They rode into Kansas, rigged votes, and caused general mayhem and trouble. The Jayhawkers were born in response to those raids.
In the 1850s, the Kansas territory was a battleground between those wanting a state where slavery would be legal and those committed to a Free State. The factions looted, sacked, rustled cattle, and otherwise attacked each others settlements. For a time, ruffians on both sides were called Jayhawkers. But the name stuck to the free staters. Lawrence, where KU would be founded, was a Free State stronghold.
During the Civil War, the Jayhawk's ruffian image gave way to patriotic symbol. Kansas Governor Charles Robinson raised a regiment called the Independent Mounted Kansas Jayhawkers. By war's end, Jayhawks were synonymous with the people who made Kansas a Free State.
Originally Posted by crmp0007
The winning side writes the history books. One man's patriot is another man's terrorist. Bin Laden is a "patriot" to some in the Middle East.
Osceola was burned, looted, men murdered and women raped. Quantrill's sacking of Lawrence was in response to that.
I'm going with the side leaning towards jayhawks and redlegs are murders and rapist, simply because I liked Clint Eastwood in Josie Wales.