Hey everyone, did you hear yesterday that Love-Machine was cancelled on?!
Dude. We get it... stop, please.
Originally Posted by AwwWord
Um, did you notice who started this thread? I didn't post anything longer than a sentence until you saw fit to troll me ... And of course, you were free to ignore my original posts, but you didn't, did you?
Calling me a WK... um... ok.
Yep, that's what we call hobbiests who - with absolute and utterly unquestioned support of a provider - stick their noses into shit they actually have no direct knowledge of to stifle ANY negative information about said provider.
You've been put on notice ladies: Do not have an emergency under any circumstance, after you've scheduled with Mr. Machine.
Assuming it WAS an "emergency" ... I mean, she had seen two other hobbiests before lunch (I found out later), she made a point of letting me know that she would have to re-check-in to her incall to do our appointment 10 minutes before the "emergency" SUDDENLY arose, and she spent a good 30 minutes sending me lengthy texts while this "emergency" was supposedly going on. So yeah ...
If your time is worth money, like you said, let us know this amount. I am pretty sure I can arrange to get you this amount so you stop beating this dead horse.
$395/hour
You personally messaging me to tell (threaten) me that you will keep posting negative comments on her is just plain crazy... like literally crazy. You only make yourself look unstable by PM'ing me that you will repeatedly post that she cancelled on you.
Regarding the notion that I "threatened" you, if you haven't yet noticed, I'm completely willing to call your bullshit - and in his cas, share with everybody the PM I sent you. (Can we get special dispensation from the mods?) And I will tell you now exactly what I told you then - if you want to keep up the WKing, I will keep responding. If you think being sick of the WKing bullshit makes me "unstable", then so be it - I mean, I DO have an awful reputation for causing trouble on this site (?!). I issued couple of simple warnings; YOU are the troll who decided - in private tags, no less - to discredit my warnings having absolutely no direct knowledge of what happened. It only became "epic" SOLELY because YOU continually insist on having the last word on something you don't know shit about, and I'm simply not going to let you.
Yesterday there was 1 review, out of 4, that you didn't get to WOW us with your story of her cancelling on you. I was more making a joke, on that single review, that I was surprised you didn't go 4 for 4 telling us about the atrocity she committed against you. I apologize for assuming you would go for perfection in your complaining.
Apology accepted (you see what I did there?) ... But actually, until YOU got involved as the arbiter of my veracity, I only posted short and simple time-waster warnings on her WW thread and TWO brand new reviews. As for you and the hobbiest above who characterized the number of my posts as excessive and "vindictive," let's just assume for the sake of argument that I actually wanted to convey that I had a time-wasting experience with this provider to other like-minded hobbiests (as opposed to systematically conspiring to destroy the budding careers of all new providers): considering that not all future time-valuing hobbiests will see ALL the reviews, what's the EXACT number of brand new reviews posted on a single day should the warning be listed on so as not to offend your tender WK sensibilities? And then, which ones should I pick? Any other than yours?
