Will Rand Paul be the GOP nominee in 2016?

You are certifiably insane.

Putting either of those dopes on a national ticket would result in a worse defeat for the GOP than Goldwater in 1964.

For the record, I believe Herman Cain did sexually harass at least some of those four women that accused him. He is also too old to be elected President. He will be 71 in 2016.

And Sarah Palin does not possess a SINGLE qualification for either President or VP of the US.

She is an unintelligent, anti-intellectual hack that somehow slipped out of the trailer park to become governor of a state that is disproportionately populated with blue-collar men with outstanding warrants in the other 49 states.

No one - not even you - would know or care about her if John McCain had done even the most basic due diligence on her and never even thought of asking her to join his ticket. Originally Posted by ExNYer

and they wonder why the gop takes an ass whippin' at the polls

unlike partisan hacks like you, I'll vote for the best choice, party be damned Originally Posted by CJ7

like the dipshit thats in the white house now

unlike partisan hacks like you, I'll vote for the best choice, party be damned Originally Posted by CJ7

like the dipshit that's in the white house now

Oh really, what in my post constitutes me as a nut? Originally Posted by acp5762

If the shoe fits......................

If the shoe fits...................... Originally Posted by bigtex

Hahaha, you don't know shit jerk off. Go run your car off a cliff.

The Republican candidate will be the one with the strongest support from the lunatic fringe which means the lose again.

Chris Matthews thinks so.

http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.co...16-gop?ref=fpb

It's my feeling that if the right wing whackadoos take over the GOP, that the nominee will more likely be Ted Cruz. He's smarter, a better speaker, doesn't look as weird as Paul, he doesn't have the looney-dad baggage and the Republicans will delude themselves into thinking that he translates into more Hispanic votes for them.....which just might be true.

Crispy Crème is the obvious choice that gives the GOP a chance in the general election.....will they be too stupid to realize it? Or, am I wrong? Will the American people elect a morbidly obese man as POTUS? What happened to that GI bypass he supposedly had? Did he blow it out at a KFC while on a wing-bender?

The republicans are fucked up. Originally Posted by timpage

Does Chris get that tingle up his leg for her?

To answer the OP's originol question, no, Rand Paul will not be the nominee in 2016.
I personally think the GOP should just sit it out in lew of The Electorate looking forward to the 3d term of Bill Clinton and concentrate on the House, Senate, and local elections

It doesn't matter whether it is Bachman, Rand Paul, Ted Cruz, Governor Quitter, Raisin' Cain, Santorum or Prick Perry. They're all peas out of the same diseased pod.

LOSERS!!!!!

Look at the NAME being thrown against the wall for the democratic party. Poor democrats.

I'll even give you a good picture


the subject is anyone's guess Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

Your dick or brain...probably both!

Your dick or brain...probably both!


Originally Posted by WTF

Probably both.......added together!

From EXNYR

You are certifiably insane. Do you have any proof of this professional statement? If not, then retract it.

Putting either of those dopes on a national ticket would result in a worse defeat for the GOP than Goldwater in 1964.

For the record, I believe Herman Cain did sexually harass at least some of those four women that accused him. He is also too old to be elected President. He will be 71 in 2016. No proof of harassment or witnesses were ever presented but you believe...Santa is not real either or do you think all black men want sex with white wome? Also, Hillary will 69 years old when the election occurs and she is not aging very well. Lets also understand fully the original comment; Palin for president and Cain for VP. Lets try to keep it straight.

And Sarah Palin does not possess a SINGLE qualification for either President or VP of the US. Lets see...she is a college graduate, she was a co-owner of a small business, she was the chief executive of a small town, she was a chief executive a large state, and lately she has been very effective in promoting the conservative moment and conservative candidates. Care to compare her to Obama's qualifications?

She is an unintelligent, anti-intellectual hack that somehow slipped out of the trailer park to become governor of a state that is disproportionately populated with blue-collar men with outstanding warrants in the other 49 states. What? You're attacking Alaska now??? You from New York? You have no room to talk. You gave this country Spitzer, Weiner, Cuomo. and Alec Baldwin. You should really apologize. Do you care to prove that Palin is anti-intellectual. Interesting term. ANTI and not UN. There should be proof of that.

No one - not even you - would know or care about her if John McCain had done even the most basic due diligence on her and never even thought of asking her to join his ticket. Palin was the best thing to happen to his ticket. So you want to believe what Schmidt said when it was his election to lose, and he did. Of course he is going to try to deflect blame but you don't have to believe the lies that have been revealed.

Okay, what are Hillary's qualifications based on what you said here. Where is her intellectual curiousity? Her ghost written book? Work she did years ago as an intern? She came out of a Chicago suburb (and that should be a disqualifier right there), had a good college career, married an absolute bounder who took every opportunity to embarass her and she took it. If she won't stand up for herself how can she stand up for the country?

OK JD, it's put up or shut up time.

How about you and me betting 5 Benji's on the outcome of a Hillary/Palin race, should the two win their party's nomination for POTUS. It is probably a safe bet for you because there is no way in hell that Governor Quitter will win the Republican nomination. Even Republicans are smarter than that! If one or the other or both do not win their party's nomination for POTUS, the bet's off. Simple as that!

Take the plunge cuz it sure would make things interesting for the next 2 1/2-3 years. Wouldn't it?

Are you willing to put your money where your mouth is? I am!

From EXNYR

You are certifiably insane. Do you have any proof of this professional statement? If not, then retract it.

Putting either of those dopes on a national ticket would result in a worse defeat for the GOP than Goldwater in 1964.

For the record, I believe Herman Cain did sexually harass at least some of those four women that accused him. He is also too old to be elected President. He will be 71 in 2016. No proof of harassment or witnesses were ever presented but you believe...Santa is not real either or do you think all black men want sex with white wome? Also, Hillary will 69 years old when the election occurs and she is not aging very well. Lets also understand fully the original comment; Palin for president and Cain for VP. Lets try to keep it straight.

And Sarah Palin does not possess a SINGLE qualification for either President or VP of the US. Lets see...she is a college graduate, she was a co-owner of a small business, she was the chief executive of a small town, she was a chief executive a large state, and lately she has been very effective in promoting the conservative moment and conservative candidates. Care to compare her to Obama's qualifications?

She is an unintelligent, anti-intellectual hack that somehow slipped out of the trailer park to become governor of a state that is disproportionately populated with blue-collar men with outstanding warrants in the other 49 states. What? You're attacking Alaska now??? You from New York? You have no room to talk. You gave this country Spitzer, Weiner, Cuomo. and Alec Baldwin. You should really apologize. Do you care to prove that Palin is anti-intellectual. Interesting term. ANTI and not UN. There should be proof of that.

No one - not even you - would know or care about her if John McCain had done even the most basic due diligence on her and never even thought of asking her to join his ticket. Palin was the best thing to happen to his ticket. So you want to believe what Schmidt said when it was his election to lose, and he did. Of course he is going to try to deflect blame but you don't have to believe the lies that have been revealed.

Okay, what are Hillary's qualifications based on what you said here. Where is her intellectual curiousity? Her ghost written book? Work she did years ago as an intern? She came out of a Chicago suburb (and that should be a disqualifier right there), had a good college career, married an absolute bounder who took every opportunity to embarass her and she took it. If she won't stand up for herself how can she stand up for the country? Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

I do believe a carpet bagger just witnessed a Missouri boat ride...LOL

To refresh your memory, I don't gamble even on sure things. We don't even know who is going to run for president. We know who wants to run for president but then....she wanted to in 2008 but something happened. Just some stupid bravado from you is all you got.