I certainly agree with that line of thinking. I think in Israel we should kick out the Palestinians to form their own nation somewhere else, and have Israel totally controlled by Jewish people.
By the way, are you implying diversity is not a strength? Because diversity being a strength is the organizing principle of the United States, not race like you propose for the Ukraine. I'm with you, insofar as I think diversity being a strength is a great big fraud.
Originally Posted by Jewish Lawyer
You're such a fraud and you seem to revel in it.
Crimea only became part of Ukraine in 1954 when Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev transferred jurisdiction from Russia, a move that was a mere formality when both Ukraine and Russia were part of the Soviet Union. The Soviet breakup in 1991 meant Crimea landed in an independent Ukraine. Crimea was not part of Ukraine because of any great nationalistic movement, it was because Khrushchev and some other idiots decided to do it. If they had left things along Crimea would still be part of Russia and they would not be having these problems.
Diversity is the great strength of the United States and it is why it's economy is the engine that drives the world. The problems in the Ukraine are because leaders back in the old Soviet Union days decided to cut and paste areas and when it all fell apart the results were nations put together by third parties which leads to problems such as this.
And I agree with COG that it would be more appropriate for the Palestinians to kick the Jews out. This is another example of third parties getting together and forming a nation. Here is a little something I found on the web that should throw you into a rage of name calling.
To better understand the Palestinian bid for membership in the United Nations, it is important to understand the original 1947 UN action on Israel-Palestine.
The common representation of Israel’s birth is that the UN created Israel, that the world was in favor of this move, and that the US governmental establishment supported it. All these assumptions are demonstrably incorrect.
In reality, while the UN General Assembly recommended the creation of a Jewish state in part of Palestine, that recommendation was non-binding and never implemented by the Security Council.
Second, the General Assembly passed that recommendation only after Israel proponents threatened and bribed numerous countries in order to gain a required two-thirds of votes.
Third, the US administration supported the recommendation out of domestic electoral considerations, and took this position over the strenuous objections of the State Department, the CIA, and the Pentagon.
The passage of the General Assembly recommendation sparked increased violence in the region. Over the following months the armed wing of the pro-Israel movement, which had long been preparing for war, perpetrated a series of massacres and expulsions throughout Palestine, implementing a plan to clear the way for a majority-Jewish state.
It was this armed aggression, and the ethnic cleansing of at least three-quarters of a million indigenous Palestinians, that created the Jewish state on land that had been 95 percent non-Jewish prior to Zionist immigration and that even after years of immigration remained 70 percent non-Jewish. And despite the shallow patina of legality its partisans extracted from the General Assembly, Israel was born over the opposition of American experts and of governments around the world, who opposed it on both pragmatic and moral grounds.