DHS Orders Border Patrol to Run Away from

I think you resoundingly proved your case. Originally Posted by Jewish Lawyer

you think ? there's the entire problem.

We aren't, this is mostly made up shit (the controversy at least).



Even if this is really an Obama policy (and I don't concede that at all) I didn't see you complain about Reagan ordering the Marines in Lebanon to not load their weapons before they were blown to bits and 241 Marines (and 398 total people) died.

Obama is just being Reaganesque IMHO Originally Posted by LordBeaverbrook

Of course you didn't "see me complain" about Reagan's action. This board wasn't here. But make up stuff about me, if it makes you feel better. Question: How does Reagan's actions justify Obama's policy? Are you saying that since Reagan pursued a ridiculous and dangerous policy, we have to allow Obama to pursue a ridiculous and dangerous policy? Do you have any idea how stupid that is?

I'm not a Reagan supporter. He talked a good game, but rarely followed through. Beirut, Grenada, etc. were disasters. He was a as much of a statist as his successors have been. He did nothing to stop, or even slow down the advance of the police state.

But go ahead. Since there is no credible way to defend Obama on this, make fun of Reagan, and pretend I supported him. If it makes you feel better.

But go ahead. Since there is no credible way to defend Obama on this, make fun of Reagan, and pretend I supported him. If it makes you feel better. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Let me guess, the years Reagan ran you supported Gary Johnson's Grandfather.

But go ahead. Since there is no credible way to defend Obama on this, make fun of Reagan, and pretend I supported him. If it makes you feel better. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Let me guess, when Reagan ran you supported Gary Johnson's Grandfather. He couldn't get elected either!

In 1980 I voted for Ed Clark. In 1984, I voted for David Bergland. I will not vote for anyone who will advance the statist platform. When you vote for the lesser of two evils, guess what? You are voting for evil.

But go ahead. Since there is no credible way to defend Obama on this, make fun of Reagan, and pretend I supported him. If it makes you feel better. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Let me guess, when Reagan ran you supported Gary Johnson's Grandfather. He couldn't get elected either! Originally Posted by bigtex

In 1980 I voted for Ed Clark. In 1984, I voted for David Bergland. I will not vote for anyone who has a snowball's chance in hell of actually winning an election. Thus my past votes for Gary Johnson, Ed Clark and David Bergland are a perfect illustration of the always vote for a loser strategy. By voting for these perennial losers, I can continue to bitch and moan incessantly about the candidate who actually does win by making a feeble claim that the reason that I have the right to complain is because I NEVER vote for a candidate who may actually win an election. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Fixed it for you, no charge!

Do you have any idea how stupid that is? Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

I suggest you program your computers to, every time you type the above statement, switch it to "I disagree, here's why..."

You'll sound smarter and more personable with minimal effort.

I suggest you program your computers to, every time you type the above statement, switch it to "I disagree, here's why..."

You'll sound smarter and more personable with minimal effort. Originally Posted by JohnnyCap

I disagree with you, and here's why: Do you have any idea how stupid that is?

Better now?