That just about sums him up ... lock, stock, and barrel....
Yes, you are a moron and like all morons have reading comprehension and a conclusion drawing problems (among other things). Again, you are making shit up...your MO.
Originally Posted by gnadfly
More deflection. A question was asked, I answered it.wipe your mouth and move along.
You answered it wrong but I guess you think that counts...
Yes, you are a moron and like all morons have reading comprehension and a conclusion drawing problems (among other things). Again, you are making shit up...your MO.
I could say the same about you, in fact I will .. Yes, you are a moron and like all morons have reading comprehension and a conclusion drawing problems (among other things). Again, you are making shit up...your MO.
They are killing each other everyday and will continue to kill each other long after we are gone. That wasn't the issue. The issue is Obama wrote a check that he couldn't cash and you Dimtards are trying to extricate him from another self-imposed blunder. I'm waiting for him to use the "Hey, I'm always good for a beer!" excuse.
He can cash it, he is just playing political football and getting his critics on the record with a vote. Smart move IMHO.
...like delusions of grandeur. Originally Posted by gnadfly
Game, set and match! Rule #7 of arguing with WTF, the moronic buffoon. Originally Posted by gnadflyThis from the buffoon who at first thought cops killing a 95 year old man was a bit excessive .... to "Let us gather more facts".
So tell us WTF; what is the name of this pro western, secular anti-Assad faction that we should be supporting...........you claim it exists, then what is the name?Have you forgotten to thank me?
....... Originally Posted by Whirlaway
Must I do all your research?
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2013/...yrias-largest/
Western-backed opposition fighters and a faction of al Qaeda-linked rebels turned their guns on each other Saturday in Syria’s largest city, battling for control of a key checkpoint in the latest eruption of infighting among the forces trying to topple President Bashar Assad’s regime, activists said.
The clashes between rebels affiliated with the Free Syrian Army and fighters from the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant underscored the growing phenomenon of rebel-on-rebel violence that has sapped strength from the broader anti-Assad movement. It also underscores the rebels’ inability more than two years into the conflict to unite around a unified command, as well as the deepening rift between more secular opposition fighters and Islamic extremists in the rebel ranks Originally Posted by WTF
According to Reuters, the organization's military command is "Islamist dominated". The Associated Press says that "Many of the participating groups (in the FSA) have strong Islamists agendas, and some have fought in ways that could scare away Western backers. They include the Tawheed Brigade, whose ideology is similar to that of the Muslim Brotherhood, and the Falcons of Damascus, an ultraconservative Islamist group." [3]
The Wall Street Journal reports that Brig. Gen. Mithkal Albtaish, an FSA leader, says that the organization is "dominated by Islamist groups that are in close coordination with al Nusra," [4] the al-Qaeda aligned terrorist group. The idea, then, that the FSA is secular is mistaken.
Neither does the FSA have a political program committed to democracy. "Eliminate Assad" does not necessarily mean "create democracy." It could mean "create theocracy" or "create a US-puppet regime." Hence, what the FSA wants to replace Assad with, is not defined, but given that the organization is backed, armed, supported and guided by the United States, its European satellites, and Arab royalist dictators (an iconoclast has dubbed the loose alliance of rebel groups the Foreign Supplied Army) we can guess that the answer is: whatever the FSA's backers, prime among them Washington, say.
And let's be clear. The FSA's goal isn't to eliminate Assad per se, but the policies Assad and his allies are committed to: economic nationalism; anti-colonialism; alliance with Iran; and so on, about which more in a moment. It is inconceivable that the United States and its FSA marionette would tolerate a successor to Assad who maintained Assad's foreign and economic policies.
You can blindly (on good faith) believe that the FSA represents a secular force, hoping that if they prevail they will embrace secularism; I don't. There is no proof that the FSA will embrace secularism if Assad goes; all of the evidence (Iraq, Libya, Egypt) tells us otherwise. And the reporting by the WSJ, Reuters, and AP tells us that the FSA isn't a single minded entity but a coalition of ideologies from moderate to the most extreme of Islamists. Once Assad goes; the FSA will dissolve and Sharia fundamentalism will be the rule of law in Syria !
FACT JACK ! Originally Posted by Whirlaway
