Fake review JayCo

Because, all we got is fat whores....and if he removed it, he would have to fuck one of them.

...and now his other 13 reviews are called into question:

http://eccie.net/member.php?u=7386&tab=eccie_reviews

Anyone willing to hazard a guess as to which, if any, session(s) actually took place? Originally Posted by Don T. Lukbak

Recommending Nikki Avalon (LV) in 2010 would be an auto DQ, IMHO.

Thats because you're only looking at it from your point of view. Try looking at it from a moderator's perspective.

Reviews automatically go into an approval queue for approval and assignment to the provider. In that queue, whatever mod is available at that time will assign them. There is no mechanism available to alert us as to whether or not there is a dispute going on at that time...it's a standalone process.

Even if there were, there is a separate protocol we have to follow for investigating possible fraudulent reviews. We have no idea what happened or what is true or not. We have no reason to believe you over him or vice versa. He says it happened in his review and you say it did not.

The fact of the matter is that any number of things could have happened. He could have put the wrong date, seen you (or Kristen) under a different name, maybe a record keeping error, maybe he's lying or mistaken about some or all of it, or maybe you're lying or mistaken. We have no clue.

This is just a message board with volunteer staff doing what we can. We will gladly investigate to the extent possible but the reality is that we have no ability to discern what did or did not happen. If we are not 100% sure, the policy on this site is to leave it as is and let member's decide for themselves what is true. You can avail yourself of a coed rebuttal thread which can be, and has been, linked to the review thread.

I realize it is frustrating when this happens but, as I said, try to look at it from the moderator's perspective. Originally Posted by SpiceItUp

Like I already said. No amount of explaining will make me understand the "process"
You mods don't look at it from the prospective of the provider . This is our JOB and how we make money. This is all just fun and games to mods, but this is my livelihood... So no I don't think it makes sense to ignore fake reviews and just leave them. The lack of interest to remove a fake review that effects our business is baffling to me.
But that's beside the point.... The review is fake- he hasn't responded to any of my PMs to explain himself.

Ember, I'll see you for free. I didn't get a chance to see you in austin, but gosh darn it, I'll right the wrongs on this board.

#martyrstatus

Jk, hope all is well! Best wishes!

You don't look at it from the mods point of view, you have been known to not know who you've seen in the past, so why should anyone take your word for it?
http://eccie.net/showthread.php?t=1531237
Maybe if you slow down a little bit and pay attention?

Like I already said. No amount of explaining will make me understand the "process"
You mods don't look at it from the prospective of the provider . This is our JOB and how we make money. This is all just fun and games to mods, but this is my livelihood... So no I don't think it makes sense to ignore fake reviews and just leave them. The lack of interest to remove a fake review that effects our business is baffling to me.
But that's beside the point.... The review is fake- he hasn't responded to any of my PMs to explain himself. Originally Posted by Ember Simmers

I see. So basically it is your position that moderators should take the provider's word for it and remove any review she claims is fake.

That's not going to happen. Once again, we have no ability to determine who is telling the truth when we have a "he said, she said".

I get it. You say it's fake. You may believe it is, hell you may know it for a fact. But to everyone else it's just one person saying one thing and another saying something different. I don't see what's so hard to grasp about that.

Sometimes information comes to light that tips the scales in one direction or another in which case we gladly take corrective action. If not, as I said before, we have no reason to believe you over him or vice versa.

Truth be told, the fact that it is your business actually introduces a vested interest in you controlling your "brand" and the information that's out there about you. Perfectly understandable, and I'm not saying that's occurring here, but it is true nonetheless. There are, and have been in the past, sites out there which gladly remove any disputed review. Those sites become a joke as they shift from information exchange to pure marketing hype over time. Nothing damages the credibility of a board more than censorship and removing member content.

It is precisely to alleviate any such concerns that Eccie has this objective and neutral party way of dealing with these scenarios. It is the position of this board that member content (male or female) be allowed to stand as posted unless very specific criteria apply. Unfortunately for you that means that occasionally some review you may know to be fraudulent is allowed to remain simply because we do not take your word over his.

If you cannot understand that then I suggest perhaps your subjectivity and myopic perspective are the issue. You have 322 reviews. I'm sure your reputation will survive.

Like I already said. No amount of explaining will make me understand the "process" Originally Posted by Ember Simmers

You are behaving quite selfish and immature. You can yell a million times "this is my job" - but everyone already knows that.

I didn't even read the alleged fake review but your childish entitled attitude speaks more volumes to me than it would have. You just did more damage to your reputation than it could have by your post.

Mods- work for free. Do you?
Mods don't make policy. Do you?
Mods are not judges, they just police.
Mods are not legislators, they just police.

I am compassionate to your plite but you have to understand there is a process in every aspect of life, even whoredom. I suggest you submit the fake review claim protest upstream. Bashing the local mod only makes you look bad imo.


Most of us already belive it is a fake review, most of us already understand Jayco is most likely Sargent Jay and his "co" is the vice squad and the "Coming soon" avatar is his idea of tongue in cheek humor. He made a review on someone he didn't expect to rebuke so he could maintain his premier access timer and keep surveillance going. You did. His best option. Stay silent. No worries. No suprises.

Breath, reorganize, solve. -simple.

Good luck

So, no free pussy for the mods to make it go away? I bet if you allow them to run a train on you for free, it'll disappear with a quickness...help our local mods out with their thankless job...

I take it poor Spice would be the end of that train

Choo Choo

Give me that free pussy (first in line)........I'll remove that fucking review.......ijs

Think you're about 1000 shy of first in line. ijs

I take it poor Spice would be the end of that train Originally Posted by dearhunter

The brothas are always in the back...

The brothas are always in the back... Originally Posted by Wakeup

I thought that changed with affirmative action, at least one brotha had to be included somewhere near the front?

Shit, now Jada and Spike are gonna boycott the train too!

Only on buses going to the penitentiary.