She’s a Trump appointee and will always be a Trump sympathizer.
He’ll be busting rocks in Sing Sing before that trial get set.
This may nave become important because it has become evident that NARA coordinated with the White House and the FBI on a transfer of a couple pallets worth of boxes that had been in temp storage in DC w/ NARA. The documents were transferred to Mar-a-lago w/o being processed by NARA. In effect, if any documents are found in the cases that were transferred by the govt to be evidence against the defendents, the argument could be made that the govt. placed them in the boxes, forced the transfer and then raided the place to find the boxes they transferred. ie. a set up. It's not conclusive of course, simply a defense, but that's why chain of custody is important.Why is it important to keep the same sequence? Trump had documents that went from the floor of his bathroom all the way to the ceiling.
There's a word for lying to the court about evidence, but I can't recall what it might be.... Originally Posted by texassapper
I read through the pdf at the link you provided in the first post. In the provided document I found no evidence or statements indicating that the DOJ or any of its agents or contractors added or manipulated the documents in each box Originally Posted by txdot-guyDo you really think that if the DOJ ADDED or MANIPULATED the contents of the box to incriminate Trump they would document it?
Only in your fevered imagination is there any actual evidence of wrongdoing that would be necessary to scuttle the case. Originally Posted by txdot-guySo just to be clear, you think the FBI would NOT lie in order to frame Trump?
In my opinion I think she is going through the motions to stall the trial until after the election. In other words she is the corruption you are looking for. Originally Posted by txdot-guyWhy would delaying the trial be corrupt? What possible argument could you make that delaying the trial until after the election demonstrates corruption, but not having it during the election isn't? When should this case have been brought to trial?
Do you really think that if the DOJ ADDED or MANIPULATED the contents of the box to incriminate Trump they would document it?Absence of evidence isn’t itself evidence. Just because you believe that the DOJ would lie and manufacture evidence certainly doesn’t mean that they did!
It has NOTHING to do with evidence that the FBI screwed with things in a criminal manner. Because even the FBI isn't STUPID enough to document themselves in the process of committing a crime.
But they ARE STUPID enough to swear that they left everything as they found it... which isn't TRUE. Originally Posted by texassapper
So just to be clear, you think the FBI would NOT lie in order to frame Trump? Originally Posted by texassapperNo I don’t believe that the FBI would lie to frame Trump. The reasons why are obvious, the scrutiny on this case is overwhelming and the likelihood of getting caught in a lie increases. They don’t need to lie because Trump did the crime they are prosecuting him for! The man is as guilty as a cat in a goldfish bowl!
Why would delaying the trial be corrupt? What possible argument could you make that delaying the trial until after the election demonstrates corruption, but not having it during the election isn't? When should this case have been brought to trial? Originally Posted by texassapperThe longer the delay the more it helps the defendant. I think that she is deliberately delaying the trial and giving biased rulings because she is a Trump supporter who should never have been allowed to try this case. Either that or she is just a very poor judge. An idiot of the first order.
No I don’t believe that the FBI would lie to frame Trump.They’ve done it before, of course they’d do it again. The stakes are much higher now, so the likelihood of it happening definitely increases. Everyone, including Trump, now knows the shit they pulled circa 20015-18, and fbi executives will be fortunate to only lose their job if/when Trump gets back in office.