"...we have identified the forces that could move to Benghazi. They are spinning up as we speak. They include ..."

Do you have any factual basis to claim that any email produced from an SOS server or the Clintons' private server was "created" and "time stamped" in order for it to "look official."

Fortunately for us all ("the war on terror") the FBI has the ability to authenticate emails and track them electronically to the date and second they were produced as well as the originating machine that produced them.

Please don't forget that Hillarious is probably the only person in this country with an Iphone ("smart phone") who thinks she can only have one email account on one phone! Are you going to make it "two" who are so ignorant?

"Anyone can create an email and time stamp it and make it look official,..." ... REALLY? Originally Posted by LexusLover
The point is moot. That means it doesn't matter, for you fucking idiots out there.
Does anyone know the exact number of Benghazi threads that our resident Idiot Klan, errr Clan members have started in this forum?

Are we over a hundred yet? Or is the actual number closer to a thousand?
Yssup Rider's Avatar
But they sure ignored the Planned Parenthood massacre in Colorado Springs. Happily for them, the next weekly mass shooting in the US was perpetrated by a Muslim. I wonder why Trump hasn't called for a ban on fundamental Christians?
I B Hankering's Avatar
And as so often happens, you will be handed your ass now. The email is insignificant bullshit that echoes testimony already given by Panetta, dumbass. It shows no new evidence of anything, as bad as you wish it did. Keep trying, idiot.

http://www.mediamatters.org/research...s-lie-t/207377 Originally Posted by WombRaider
You'd be the one with your ass handed to you on a silver platter, you 2015 DOTY and "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas. Because, heretofore, you repeatedly posted that the document was a work of fiction, you 2015 DOTY and "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas. But now you cite a lib-retard source that -- in fact -- states that the document you denied as being real IS REAL, you 2015 DOTY and "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas. Furthermore, you 2015 DOTY and "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas, your Mediamatters -- a uber lib-retarded outlet that has previously been caught in numerous lies and misrepresentations -- did not address WHEN or IF Odumbo and Hildabeast ever gave the word for THOSE particular forces that were "spinning up" to deploy posthaste.
You'd be the one with your ass handed to you on a silver platter, you 2015 DOTY and "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas. Because, heretofore, you repeatedly posted that the document was a work of fiction, you 2015 DOTY and "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas. But now you cite a lib-retard source that -- in fact -- states that the document you denied as being real IS REAL, you 2015 DOTY and "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas. Furthermore, you 2015 DOTY and "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas, your Mediamatters -- a uber lib-retarded outlet that has previously been caught in numerous lies and misrepresentations -- did not address WHEN or IF Odumbo and Hildabeast ever gave the word for THOSE particular forces that were "spinning up" to deploy posthaste. Originally Posted by I B Hankering
That's a long-winded way of saying you were fucking wrong, but I'll take it. The email confirms Panetta's testimony. You spent a whole paragraph debasing me, but nothing on the crux of the matter, because it proves you are incorrect in your assertion that this is somehow a smoking gun. It's not. You were wrong. There were never any forces ready to go that would have been able to help in benghazi. That has been determined over and over, but you idiots are clinging to any scrap of meat you can, hoping the story changes. It hasn't.
I B Hankering's Avatar
That's a long-winded way of saying you were fucking wrong, but I'll take it. The email confirms Panetta's testimony. You spent a whole paragraph debasing me, but nothing on the crux of the matter, because it proves you are incorrect in your assertion that this is somehow a smoking gun. It's not. You were wrong. There were never any forces ready to go that would have been able to help in benghazi. That has been determined over and over, but you idiots are clinging to any scrap of meat you can, hoping the story changes. It hasn't. Originally Posted by WombRaider
You'd be the jizz sucking clown that's wrong, you 2015 DOTY and "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas; you repeatedly posted that the document was phony. And now that you've had you ass handed to you over the issue of whether the document was real or phony, you can't back up your current POV with anything substantive that refutes what Judicial Watch has uncovered, you 2015 DOTY and "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas.
lustylad's Avatar
You also cite no source or any other pertinent info. I'm calling bullshit. Originally Posted by WombRaider
You conveniently left out a source. Anyone can create an email and time stamp it and make it look official, you fucking moron. Originally Posted by WombRaider
You'd be the one with your ass handed to you on a silver platter... you repeatedly posted that the document was a work of fiction... now you cite a lib-retard source that -- in fact -- states that the document you denied as being real IS REAL... Originally Posted by I B Hankering

+1


My, my, my... the poor little sewer rat got his squeaky rodent butt completely reamed on this one! Now he'll say he doesn't give a fuck - "the point is moot." Notice how the point only becomes moot after he has his ass handed to him. He has no self-esteem or rectum lining left, lol. As long as it runs up his post count, it's all good!



.
Please, gents. Let's be fair.

How can you expect a guy who churns out 1,000 posts per month to avoid contradicting himself a few times here and there?
LexusLover's Avatar
The point is moot. Originally Posted by WombRaider
The "point" may be "moot" for you, but it's not "moot"!
lustylad's Avatar
The "point" may be "moot" for you, but it's not "moot"! Originally Posted by LexusLover
Actually it was a very salient point for the sewer rat in post #5 and post #20 of this thread.... it only became a "moot" point for him by post #31. Get it now?


How can you expect a guy who churns out 1,000 posts per month to avoid contradicting himself a few times here and there? Originally Posted by Ex-CEO
Only 1,000 a month? He must be slacking off... I could overlook a stumble or two if it was just "here and there" but it's more like the Beatles song - here, there and everywhere! I mean, look how many times the dipshit contradicts himself in the same thread... or in a single post... or paragraph... or sentence!
.
Only 1,000 a month? He must be slacking off. Originally Posted by lustylad
Maybe he's getting tired and fat. Does he get paid by the post?
lustylad's Avatar
Maybe he's getting tired and fat. Does he get paid by the post? Originally Posted by Ex-CEO
What do you mean "getting" fat? He's always been a porker. When he gets tired, he yells upstairs for another quart of Mountain Dew. And yes, he gets paid by the post count. The only half-truth he has told on this board is he is a free-lancer. He neglected to tell us his only free-lance gig is spamming for eccie!
.
What do you mean "getting" fat? He's always been a porker. When he gets tired, he yells upstairs for another quart of Mountain Dew. And yes, he gets paid by the post count. The only half-truth he has told on this board is he is a free-lancer. He neglected to tell us his only free-lance gig is spamming for eccie!
. Originally Posted by lustylad
That pays extremely well, doesn't it?

I imagine a hooker-board spammer earns enough income to be able to afford the very finest escorts. Right?
LexusLover's Avatar
Do you honestly think that in a situation like that, they are going to be using EMAIL to communicate timely information? Goddamn, you are falling for it again. You also cite no source or any other pertinent info. I'm calling bullshit. Originally Posted by WombRaider
You conveniently left out a source. Anyone can create an email and time stamp it and make it look official, you fucking moron. You'll fall for just about anything, won't you? Originally Posted by WombRaider
The point is moot. That means it doesn't matter, for you fucking idiots out there. Originally Posted by WombRaider
The "point" may be "moot" for you, but it's not "moot"! Originally Posted by LexusLover
Actually it was a very salient point for the sewer rat in post #5 and post #20 of this thread.... it only became a "moot" point for him by post #31. Get it now? Originally Posted by lustylad
Yes!
cptjohnstone's Avatar
That pays extremely well, doesn't it?

I imagine a hooker-board spammer earns enough income to be able to afford the very finest escorts. Right? Originally Posted by Ex-CEO
read some of his reviews and you will see that they are very low scale