Dead candidate walking...

According to federal rules, it is the responsibility of the sender of an e-mail to ensure it contains the proper classification designations. When the dust settles Hillary will not be charged with any wrong doing.

Must have been the same ones who elected W twice. Originally Posted by i'va biggen

+1

Bush43 left office with the highest disapproval rating in history at 69%. Bush43 was the worst president in history, by far, it's not even close.

According to federal rules, it is the responsibility of the sender of an e-mail to ensure it contains the proper classification designations. When the dust settles Hillary will not be charged with any wrong doing. Originally Posted by flghtr65

You are quite clueless. She may not be charged, but it won't be because she did nothing wrong.

I think that prison orange jumpsuit flatters here figure. She should enjoy being locked up with a lot of other women so I suggest we lock her up with men except that would be considered cruel and unusual punishment.....for the men.

Smoke Coming From the Hillary Server Fire is Worse http://founderscode.com/smoke-coming...s-worse/admin/

The most important thing to Hillary is not that she is charged or not (she should be) but that she win the election. If she can get in the White House then everything goes away.

billery is nearing an epic indictment which will kill her political ambitions. she will be destroyed and she should be the newest member of the orange jumpsuit gang at ..



the evidence is piling up.
http://nypost.com/2015/08/16/feds-fl...d-data-report/

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/invest...182700270.html

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...nable-problem/

let's see her spin doctor the FBI. not going to happen.

According to federal rules, it is the responsibility of the sender of an e-mail to ensure it contains the proper classification designations. When the dust settles Hillary will not be charged with any wrong doing. Originally Posted by flghtr65

are you stupid or just posting like it? do you realize what you posted is a contradiction of the law?

if the hillbitch sent 1 email with classified info in it, labeled as such or not, it was still a violation of law. they hung out to dry David Petraeus by the neck for far less. an American patriot. billery bitch is a traitor socialist. let her swing from the rope.

http://www.cnn.com/2015/04/23/politi...us-sentencing/

the hillbitch must be convicted of treason and executed as a traitor.

have a nice day libtards.

Possession of a classified document if you are not allowed to have them is a crime. When Hillary left the State Department she was required to turn over ALL classified and non classified documents as they belong to the people of the United States. Mere possession is enough to indict a regular person.

Possession of a classified document if you are not allowed to have them is a crime. When Hillary left the State Department she was required to turn over ALL classified and non classified documents as they belong to the people of the United States. Mere possession is enough to indict a regular person. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

Regular person. Which she is not. Does she not still hold status that allows her to view classified material?

are you stupid or just posting like it? do you realize what you posted is a contradiction of the law?

if the hillbitch sent 1 email with classified info in it, labeled as such or not, it was still a violation of law. they hung out to dry David Petraeus by the neck for far less. an American patriot. billery bitch is a traitor socialist. let her swing from the rope.

http://www.cnn.com/2015/04/23/politi...us-sentencing/

the hillbitch must be convicted of treason and executed as a traitor.

have a nice day libtards. Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

The Hillary situation is totally different than the Petraeus situation. First of all the state department has said that any documents they sent to Hillary were not classified when they were sent. The classification was changed at a later date.

If someone from the State department sent Hillary an email that was really classified but did not have it labeled correctly, the sender is in trouble not the person receiving it.

It is the responsibility of the person who is sending a classified document to have it label correctly, this not only a Federal government practice but most I/T departments of Fortune 500 companies have the same rule.

Have you ever been granted access to confidential data where you work? I have.

The Hillary situation is totally different than the Petraeus situation. First of all the state department has said that any documents they sent to Hillary were not classified when they were sent. The classification was changed at a later date.

If someone from the State department sent Hillary an email that was really classified but did not have it labeled correctly, the sender is in trouble not the person receiving it.

It is the responsibility of the person who is sending a classified document to have it label correctly, this not only a Federal government practice but most I/T departments of Fortune 500 companies have the same rule.

Have you ever been granted access to confidential data where you work? I have. Originally Posted by flghtr65

Are you kidding? He doesn't even have access to the good bathroom

Let me see. She is no longer employed by the uS government, is no longer a sitting senator, I would say that she does not have the legal right to hold classified documents that were required by law to be turned over to the government.

What do you think her jailbird song will be?

Hail to the Chief.

The Hillary situation is totally different than the Petraeus situation. First of all the state department has said that any documents they sent to Hillary were not classified when they were sent. The classification was changed at a later date.

If someone from the State department sent Hillary an email that was really classified but did not have it labeled correctly, the sender is in trouble not the person receiving it.

It is the responsibility of the person who is sending a classified document to have it label correctly, this not only a Federal government practice but most I/T departments of Fortune 500 companies have the same rule.

Have you ever been granted access to confidential data where you work? I have. Originally Posted by flghtr65

You're a dumb-fuck, flighty. Once Hildabeast received the emails she was responsible for securing them in accordance with the laws and regulations, e.g., Patraeus. Preventing accidental exposure is one of the reasons why the government continues to invest the money in developing and maintaining a secure network, flighty.

BTW, flighty, even private enterprise is responsible -- per government laws and regulations -- for securing confidential material:

Sony Pictures Sued
You Let Hackers Jack Our Lives ... Ex-Employees Claim
12/16/2014 9:03 AM

Sony Pictures sat back and did nothing to protect its current and past employees from hackers, who now have access to crucial financial records of more than 15,000 people ... according to a new lawsuit.

The class action suit was filed by two ex-employees, on behalf of other Sony workers in their situation ... claiming the company was warned by the hackers, Guardians of Peace, on November 24th -- but then failed to take any action to protect its records.

The ex-workers -- who left Sony years before the hacking -- say G.O.P. now have access to 47,000 social security numbers ... as well as the birth dates, addresses, salary history, and more for Sony employees.

(source)

FYI, flighty, telling a cop you didn't "see" the posted speed limit won't get you out of a speeding ticket in most cases.

Bob Woodward compares Clinton emails to Nixon tapes
August 17, 2015, 09:25 am

Woodward predicted the fight over Clinton’s emails wouldn’t end soon.

“This has to go on a long, long time,” Woodward said Monday, “and the answers are probably not going to be pretty.” (The Hill)