Riot Police

Typical Corpy ... Welcome to day three of another Corpy meltdown!!!!

WOOOOO!

glad you liked it gramps. Originally Posted by i'va biggen

I should have spelled it out I can see you and IB never understood it.

Hijacking ANOTHER thread, eh, Corpy? Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

You lay a hand on my grandfather and you will be meeting the REAL GOD.

I should have spelled it out I can see you and IB never understood it. Originally Posted by i'va biggen

Try looking it up so YOU understand it.



Now don't be using any of those ad hominid attacks on me!

Try looking it up so YOU understand it.



Now don't be using any of those ad hominid attacks on me!

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

+1 Yes! Ekim the Inbred Chimp -- spelling!?! Isn't that an oxyMORON?

So, the police show up to protect the White House Grounds from the dregs of society and in a FAUX NEWS move some try to infer the police were moving on the WHEELCHAIRS at the WWII Memorial. Originally Posted by lostincypress

The old timers were there to keep you from shitting on a cop car...

Wallow in your ignorance, you racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass, you're in a league with Ekim the Inbred Chimp! Originally Posted by I B Hankering

The OP made the point - which you missed - that it was nearly useless to wear a bike helmet with no face mask. It offers no useful protection in a riot.

You responded by posting something STUPID about batons. Stupid, stupid, stupid.

You STILL can't explain what your first post has to do with the OP.

Because all those tranny dicks pounding your ass has caused repetitive brain trauma.

Caught AGAIN in another inane post that you can't back out of. So you speak in vague terms about others not understanding what the thread is really about.

Although you can't explain it yourself can you, tranny fucker?

You lay a hand on my grandfather and you will be meeting the REAL GOD. Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB

Only other family members can lay hands on each other, eh, hillbilly?

The OP made the point - which you missed - that it was nearly useless to wear a bike helmet with no face mask. It offers no useful protection in a riot.

You responded by posting something STUPID about batons. Stupid, stupid, stupid.

You STILL can't explain what your first post has to do with the OP.

Because all those tranny dicks pounding your ass has caused repetitive brain trauma.

Caught AGAIN in another inane post that you can't back out of. So you speak in vague terms about others not understanding what the thread is really about.

Although you can't explain it yourself can you, tranny fucker? Originally Posted by ExNYer

Funny how CBJ7 and MasterDickMuncher know what's going on, and you don't, you racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass. Don't you feel pathetically hurt being left out of your lib-retard clique, you racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass?

Try looking it up so YOU understand it.



Now don't be using any of those ad hominid attacks on me!

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Ok try to keep up.
1 the word hominid surly someone as smart as you say you are knows the meaning. If not look it up.
2 The Word "chimp" that In Bred is enamored with, which he learned from another board member.
3 I know it wasn't 100% accurate, but I thought it was clever.
4 If you two were half as smart as you think you are you would have picked up on that.
5 It was a play on words I know the term Ad Hominem
6 Hope that will explain it to you two simple shits.

Go screw yourself, CBJ7, you Odumbo-tron moron.

"A truncheon or baton (also called a cosh, billystick, billy club, nightstick, sap, blackjack, stick) is essentially a club of less than arm's length made of wood, plastic, or metal. They are carried for forced compliance and self-defense by law-enforcement officers, correctional staff, security-industry employees and (less often) military personnel. Other uses for truncheons and batons include crowd control or the dispersal of belligerent or non-compliant people.
A truncheon or baton may be used to strike, jab, block, bludgeon and aid in the application of armlocks. Sometimes, they also are employed as weapons by criminals and other law-breakers because of their easy concealment."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baton_(law_enforcement) Originally Posted by I B Hankering

In the above you defined their nightsticks as weapons to heighten the perception these are riot police.
.

You cling to the most insignificant thread to divert the fact you are wrong within the context of the post.

Using your "logic" a pen or pencil, not to mention a pocket knife, is also a weapon. Which means that most of those battle tested veterans were armed too.

A baton is of more use as a defensive measure in this type of crowd control situation.

See post 20

http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=872817&page=2 Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

In the above I point out that pencils, pens, and the pocket knives that many of the marchers could possibly be carrying were weapons too. Post 20 contained the statement; The United States Park Police shown are members (for the most part) of the Uniformed Guard Force, an unarmed guard force.
and wikis description of the majority of the park police shown.
"The USPP also oversees the Uniformed Guard Force which provides many urban National Park Service establishments with unarmed security guard and patrol services usually dealing with access and pass controls, key control, security patrols of buildings and facilities and assisting both the USPP and members of the public."

At this point, there has been no mention of the legality or illegality of any possible weapons.
Still with me on this?

Wrong again, MasterDickMucnsher! You're ignoring that it was obviously someone else at Wiki that defined such "batons" as "weapons"; so, you'll need to cite where "ink pens" and "pencils" are defined as weapons: after all, pencils are given to kindergarteners.

Proving the point, you dumb-fuckin' Odumbo-tron. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

In the above you claim I'm ignoring something I didn't challenge. While you ignore the pocket knives I mentioned, you challenge me to prove ink pens and pencils can be defined as weapons. You further state that people of your inteligence level are given pencils.
You ignoring pocket knives is key to proving your intentions later in the thread.

God I love pushing your face in the shit. It's so easy to do.

I notice you neglected to include the pocket knives that many of the protesters almost certainly carried. How typical of you.

A famous author said there are no dangerous weapons, only dangerous men.

But you want me to cite a site. Fine, no problem.


From Dictionary.com

weap·on

/ˈwɛpən/ Show Spelled [wep-uhn] Show IPA
noun 1. any instrument or device for use in attack or defense in combat, fighting, or war, as a sword, rifle, or cannon.

2. anything used against an opponent, adversary, or victim: the deadly weapon of satire.

3. Zoology . any part or organ serving for attack or defense, as claws, horns, teeth, or stings.

My contempt grows for you by each post you make. Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

In the above I describe the sheer enjoyment of proving you wrong and the ease of which it is done. Which I then do with a Dictionary.com entry that cites anything that can be used to attack someone can be a weapon.

Again, there has been no mention of the legality or tllegality or sort of any weapons discussed.

You ignorantly failed to show where "pen" and "pencils" were "weapons" of the sort proscribed by law (and as alluded to in the wiki article), MasterDickMuncher; whereas, the batons CBJ7 is making light of are considered "weapons" proscribed in public places by Texas Law:
In the above you start to blather about the Texas law as it applies to which "sorts" of weapons and wiki description that have absolutely and use the famous you-be-a -cocksucker stupidity to try and change the scope of the discussion.
You of course neglect to mention possible legal and illegal knives that you-be-a -pinhead has ignored in his tunnel vision rant about pencils and pens.

Sec 46.02 Unlawfully Carrying Weapons

(a) A person commits an offense if he intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly
carries on or about his person a handgun(without permit), illegal knife (5.5 inches or longer) or club.


Sec 46.01 Definitions In this chapter:
(1) “Club” means an instrument that is specially designed, made, or adapted for the purpose of inflicting serious bodily injury or death by striking a person with the instrument, and includes but is not limited to the following:
(A) blackjack;
(B) nightstick;
(C) mace;
(D) tomahawk
None of the underlined info has any bearing on this discussion
Now, MasterDickMuncher, cite where Teaxas -- or any other state, for that matter -- has outlawed pens, pencils and all pocket knives for the general public in public places, you pathetic, lib-retarded creature.

A couple of things. This occurred in the District of Columbia, So what the fuck does law in Texas, or any other state law for that matter, have to do with this?

Not a goddamn thing.

Next, regardless of your obvious low brow attempt at making it look like I tried to claim or imply pens or pencils were illegal, you pulled this out of your ass just like the state law.

So you couldn't be more wrong in your assertation that the above is germane in any way to the discussion.


BTW, CBJ7, you ignorant, lib-retarded moron, you ignorantly and purposefully chose to ignore this picture where the riot police are wearing helmets with faceshields:

Wrong again by you own standard. Wiki describes them as;

"The USPP also oversees the Uniformed Guard Force which provides many urban National Park Service establishments with unarmed security guard and patrol services usually dealing with access and pass controls, key control, security patrols of buildings and facilities and assisting both the USPP and members of the public."

As for the folks in real helmets, they are probably motorcycle and horse back officers.

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

To sum up:
I say pens, pencils, and pocket knives can be considered weapons by definition.
Correct.

I say the majority of the park police shown belong to the Uniformed Guard Force. Riot police duty is not described as part of their duty in any official description.
Correct.

You ask me to cite a site showing pens and pencils defined as weapons.
I did that.


You try to confuse the original discussion with failed to show where "pen" and "pencils" were "weapons" of the sort proscribed by law,
the batons CBJ7 is making light of are considered "weapons" proscribed in public places by Texas Law:
Sec 46.02 Unlawfully Carrying Weapons
Sec 46.01 Definitions In this chapter:
cite where Teaxas -- or any other state, for that matter -- has outlawed pens, pencils and all pocket knives for the general public in public places
None of which have anything to do with anything I stated.
In other words you tried to buy the thread with bullshit.


You have just been thoroughly bitch slapped.....again.


That one put your head into the cheap seats.

Enjoy, you-be-an-armadillo-fucker.

Ok try to keep up.
1 the word hominid surly someone as smart as you say you are knows the meaning. If not look it up.
2 The Word "chimp" that In Bred is enamored with, which he learned from another board member.
3 I know it wasn't 100% accurate, but I thought it was clever.
4 If you two were half as smart as you think you are you would have picked up on that.
5 It was a play on words I know the term Ad Hominem
6 Hope that will explain it to you two simple shits. Originally Posted by i'va biggen

It took awhile before you found someone to help you craft a lame response to having your ass handed to you. Whoever this is, keep them close.

It took awhile before you found someone to help you craft a lame response to having your ass handed to you. Whoever this is, keep them close.

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

you should know ... you get your ass handed to you so often you think its Christmas everyday

It took awhile before you found someone to help you craft a lame response to having your ass handed to you. Whoever this is, keep them close.

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

LOL whatever, you just aren't as clever as you think. You and IB are the epitome of dumb and dumber....

Funny how CBJ7 and MasterDickMuncher know what's going on, and you don't, you racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass. Don't you feel pathetically hurt being left out of your lib-retard clique, you racist, dumb-fuck Yankee jackass?
Originally Posted by I B Hankering

They are only responding to your initial stupid post about batons, which hijacked the thread.

They never asked what the batons had to do with the bicycle helmets.

We are all still waiting for you to give us that explanation. But you can't, can you, tranny fucker?

The OP made the point - which you missed - that it was nearly useless to wear a bike helmet with no face mask. It offers no useful protection in a riot.

You responded by posting something STUPID about batons. Stupid, stupid, stupid.

You STILL can't explain what your first post has to do with the OP.

Caught AGAIN in another inane post that you can't back out of. So you speak in vague terms about others not understanding what the thread is really about.

Spin, spin, spin, you pseudo-intellect.