Fake Review

I don't even have time to think of all that because I was too busy defending myself. And of course I wouldn't think that was his real name? The only reason it was even mentioned by me was because I was asked why I saw him again and the difference in name had something to do with that.

Does it not occur to you that might be his real name? Are you typically this indiscreet with a gent's personal information? Originally Posted by JohnnyYanks

... She let me do Daty. K9 (without the cover) ... Originally Posted by Max Tran

That's an interesting comment. Hmmm.

I'm glad you are enjoying this thread so much

That's an interesting comment. Hmmm. Originally Posted by JohnnyYanks

I don't even have time to think of all that because I was too busy defending myself.

"Too busy defending yourself" in the thread you started claiming a "Fake Review"? Hardly. You've been very much on the offensive, not the defensive.

(Which, by the way, is certainly your right. I've zero problem with that. Just don't then turn around and claim poor picked-on little me.)

And of course I wouldn't think that was his real name?

Why wouldn't you? This character sounds perfectly capable of giving you his real name.

The only reason it was even mentioned by me was because I was asked why I saw him again and the difference in name had something to do with that.

Originally Posted by SexiKenni

But that wasn't the "only reason" you saw him, according to you. You said you knew it was the same guy. What name he gave was not relevant, at all.

I'm glad you are enjoying this thread so much Originally Posted by SexiKenni

I wish. I prefer to joke around and have fun. This aint no fun.

But it seemed to me this guy was getting all the worst of it, possibly unfairly. I just felt a need to even out the sides a bit until more accurate information came to light. This is an information exchange after all.

I'm not sure I believe him but your story is a mess of holes.

I'm all about fairness.. I think Max is worn out, he does not intend to post again, but he asked me to state his position.. which is he never called the Office.. he explained that it would be a crazy thing to do, out himself, they have cameras, etc.. he decided to chalk up a $100 loss, and share his dissatisfaction in a review.

Interesting that post 28 has been edited by a mod, without said mod citing it in red ink as a mod edit and initialing his handiwork.

This happened past the 1 hour window for the poster to edit her own post.

What have we here?

Interesting that post 28 has been edited by a mod, without said mod citing it in red ink as a mod edit and initialing his handiwork.

This happened past the 1 hour window for the poster to edit her own post.

What have we here? Originally Posted by JohnnyYanks

I edited it.. was just a first name which she said he claimed to be...obviously she didn't screen to confirm it was his name and it wasn't a full name or anything to link the handle back to real life info.

I edited it.. was just a first name which she said he claimed to be...

It's okay to link first names to handles?

obviously she didn't screen to confirm it was his name

How is this "obvious"? If she didn't screen/confirm, then it might be his name. He said it was. Isn't that the most important thing, with limited data? and is it even relevant? She wrote "He claimed to be ___" which means he might, in fact, be ___.

and it wasn't a full name or anything to link the handle back to real life info.

You're saying it's okay to link first names to handles? Originally Posted by NYr

Are you sure about this? Don't we want to err on the side of caution when it comes to nuclear rules?

Don't you have anything better to do on a Sunday afternoon?

Don't you have anything better to do on a Sunday afternoon? Originally Posted by L.A.

If I did, I'd be doing it. How about you?

You have anything to add to the discussion or are you here only to derail it?

Back on topic: why hasn't the OP clarified whether she gave Max Tran the bra or if he stole it? Does she try to deliberately discredit his account by changing this detail?

" I let him wear the black during the session just so we could move forward because he wouldn't quit bugging me about it."

If I did, I'd be doing it. How about you?

You have anything to add to the discussion or are you here only to derail it?

Back on topic: why hasn't the OP clarified whether she gave Max Tran the bra or if he stole it? Does she try to deliberately discredit his account by changing this detail? Originally Posted by JohnnyYanks

I'm only here to derail it.

" I let him wear the black during the session just so we could move forward because he wouldn't quit bugging me about it."
Originally Posted by goodolboy

His behind closed doors proclivities make his review invalid?

His behind closed doors proclivities make his review invalid? Originally Posted by JohnnyYanks

No, I don't know who to believe, but I did find that detail funny as hell.

No, I don't know who to believe, but I did find that detail funny as hell. Originally Posted by goodolboy

Yes. It does make quite a visual.

But it might be false.