Fox Election Score Card - Not Good for Trump

Asfaloth54's Avatar
Bet your lame-ass can't cite those "13 attacks" without having to eat crow for the fraud you're perpetuating, ass-licker, because no American ambassadors have been killed since 1979 on Jimmy the Peanut's watch. Originally Posted by I B Hankering
I absolutely can cite the 13 attacks and the 66 deaths under Bush junior, including 3 American diplomats and 22 embassy employees - just as I can cite the number of investigations promulgated by Republicans - Zero.

http://www.snopes.com/u-s-embassy-attacks-compared/

Contrast that with the THIRTEEN investigations launched by Republicans over the TWO embassy attacks and FOUR deaths.

When you can't rebut the facts, you desperately try to move the goalposts. That's what you were forced to do here - crying in your beer that no Ambassadors were killed, as if that is in any way relevant. Nobody said shit about Ambassadors but you. If you want to make the argument that the lives of 22 American diplomats don't matter, feel free to do so. Otherwise, you could try having the integrity to admit that Republicans don't give a shit about American deaths unless they can blame them on Obama or Clinton. The dishonesty of your position is transparent.

Now, you can prove your total inability to refute these facts by playing with my user name again. It is clearly the only game you have.
Stick a fork him - Trumps done !!! Originally Posted by Luke_Wyatt
So is America.

Jim
I B Hankering's Avatar
I absolutely can cite the 13 attacks and the 66 deaths under Bush junior, including 3 American diplomats and 22 embassy employees - just as I can cite the number of investigations promulgated by Republicans - Zero.

http://www.snopes.com/u-s-embassy-attacks-compared/

Contrast that with the THIRTEEN investigations launched by Republicans over the TWO embassy attacks and FOUR deaths.

When you can't rebut the facts, you desperately try to move the goalposts. That's what you were forced to do here - crying in your beer that no Ambassadors were killed, as if that is in any way relevant. Nobody said shit about Ambassadors but you. If you want to make the argument that the lives of 22 American diplomats don't matter, feel free to do so. Otherwise, you could try having the integrity to admit that Republicans don't give a shit about American deaths unless they can blame them on Obama or Clinton. The dishonesty of your position is transparent.

Now, you can prove your total inability to refute these facts by playing with my user name again. It is clearly the only game you have.
Originally Posted by Asfaloth54

There were thirteen fuckin' investigations because the principal charlatan involved -- hildebeest -- lied, deceived and withheld pertinent, subpoenaed documents, ass-lick. Plus, you'd be the intellectually dishonest jackass citing an article that doesn't substantiate your jackass claim, ass-lick:


On 15 December 2001, gunmen killed a Nepalese security guard at the U.S. Embassy in Kathmandu. "The killing of the guard, a Nepali, took place near the compound of the US Agency for International Development (USAID), which is about eight kilometres away from the US embassy in Kathmandu."

On 22 January 2002, an attack on the American Center in Calcutta killed five policemen. Gunmen associated with Harkat-ul-Jihad al-Islami attacked the U.S. Consulate. Five people were killed. No U.S. personnel were killed or injured. The five who were killed were embassy security who died defending the perimeter outside the embassy wall.

On 20 March 2002, a car bomb exploded across the street from the U.S. Consulate General in Lima, Peru killed nine Peruvians. Three days before President Bush's arrival in Peru, a powerful car bomb blew up outside the U.S. Embassy in Lima, killing at least nine people and wounding dozens more. The State Department said no Americans were killed, and an anonymous official there later said none had been injured.

On 14 June 2002, a truck bomb exploded outside the U.S. Consulate General in Karachi, Pakistan killed 12 people (one U.S. Marine was injured). A suicide bomber connected with al Qaeda attacked the U.S. Consulate, killing 12 and injuring 51. This attack happened outside the walls of the consulate, and there were no Americans injured. Defenders died providing security.

On 28 February 2003, a gunman killed two policemen at the U.S. Consulate General in Karachi, Pakistan. Several gunmen fired upon the U.S. Embassy. Two Pakistani policemen were killed in a shooting outside the consulate, and there were no Americans injured. Defenders died providing security.

On 30 July 2004, a suicide bomber killed two people (including himself) at the U.S. Embassy in Tashkent, Uzbekistan. A suicide bomber from the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan attacked the U.S. Embassy, killing two Uzbek policemen outside the embassies of both the Israel and the United States. US and Israeli officials and staff members suffered no injuries. Defenders died providing security.

On 6 December 2004, Islamist militants attacked the U.S. Consulate in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, killing nine security guards and staff. Al Qaeda terrorists stormed the U.S. Consulate and occupied the perimeter wall. Nine people are killed. No Americans died. A defender died providing security.

On 29 January 2005, a rocket attack on the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad killed two Americans working there. Baghdad, in 2005, was a goddamn war zone, you infantile SOB.

On 2 March 2006, a car bomb exploded outside the U.S. Consulate General in Karachi, killing at least four, including a U.S. diplomat and his driver. A suicide bomber attacked the U.S. Consulate killing four people, including U.S. diplomat
David Foy who was directly targeted by the attackers. David Foy was killed by a car bomb, specifically aimed at him, in a parking lot located outside – not inside – the embassy’s walls.


On 12 September 2006, Islamic militants attacked the U.S. Embassy in Damascus, Syria, killing a Syrian security guard. Four armed gunmen shouting "Allahu akbar" stormed the U.S. Embassy using grenades, automatic weapons, a car bomb and a truck bomb. Four people were killed, 13 were wounded. No Americans were killed or injured, and all of the casualties were injured or killed outside the embassy walls. Defenders died providing security.

On 9 July 2008, gunmen attacked the U.S. consulate in Istanbul, Turkey, killing three policemen. Four armed terrorists attacked the U.S. Consulate. Six people were killed. Three Turkish National Police officers were killed defending the embassy. Defenders died providing security. All Americans inside remained safe.

On 17 September 2008, members of al-Qaeda attacked the U.S. Embassy in Sanaa, Yemen with vehicle bombs and rocket-propelled grenades, killing 12 Yemeni guards and civilians (including one U.S. civilian). Terrorists dressed as military officials attacked the U.S. Embassy with an arsenal of weapons including RPGs and two car bombs. Sixteen people are killed, including an American student and her husband (they had been married for three weeks when the attack occurred). This was the second attack on that embassy in seven months. Six attackers, six Yemeni police, and seven civilians were killed outside the embassy walls. Defenders died providing security. Absolutely zero American embassy personnel were killed or injured in the attack.

On 27 November 2008, a car bomb went off about 200 yards from the U.S. Embassy in Kabul, Afghanistan, killing at least four. Kabul, in 2008, was in a warzone, jackass, and still is!

"[T]he comparison between these 13 incidents and Benghazi is strained, however, in that four U.S. personnel were killed in the Benghazi attack alone. One might further object that only attacks in which Americans were killed ought to be counted in the first place, in which case the number of pertinent attacks under George W. Bush would total three rather than thirteen [and two of those were in a war zone and the third was killed outside the embassy walls]." (Snopes)

In no instance under W was an installation completely overrun by the attackers because there was adequate security in place, ass-lick. And, in no instance under W was an American ambassador killed, ass-lick.

Further, why doesn't your lame-ass ilk ever mention the U.S. Consulate in Peshawar that was attacked in 2010 by militants on Odumbo's watch -- you know, an attack where those lying ass SOBs you adore didn't lie about what happened, ass-licker?

And what about the attack on Camp Chapman in 2009 that killed 10 -- including 7 Americans, ass-lick? There was no investigation because no one lied about what happened, ass-lick. Eat crow, ass-lick!


The American consulate attack killed 8 people including 2 security service personnel. However, no Americans were hurt in the attack. The perpetrators were armed with guns and grenades and two car bombs. The security barrier was damaged, while shells from rocket-propelled grenades and hand grenades were seen in the vicinity. Police said one of the car bombs exploded at a checkpoint 50 metres from the consulate, while the other 100 kg bomb went off close to the consulate gate. At least three blasts were reported before a firefight between security forces and the attackers followed... The US Consulate General said two Pakistani security guards employed by the Consulate General were among those killed in the attack. (Wiki)
Asfaloth54's Avatar
So, in other words, you don't have the Character to respect the deaths of 3 American diplomats and 22 embassy employees all murdered under Bush - because - why again? Respecting the truth doesn't serve your ignorant, biased agenda?

Do you also ignore the deaths under Reagan, that include a sacred US Ambassador, (see, you've been caught lying about no Ambassador being killed since Carter. Or are you just ignorant?) 18 CIA officers, and 254 marines? Just how far does your tinfoil hat reach over your ears when it comes to disrespecting American lives? So much for Integrity.

You should be sure to let the families of those Embassy guards who died 'outside the Embassy gate' that you don't consider their deaths as meaningful as the holy grail of Benghazi.....
I B Hankering's Avatar
So, in other words, you don't have the Character to respect the deaths of 3 American diplomats and 22 embassy employees all murdered under Bush - because - why again? Respecting the truth doesn't serve your ignorant, biased agenda?

Do you also ignore the deaths under Reagan, that include a sacred US Ambassador, (see, you've been caught lying about no Ambassador being killed since Carter. Or are you just ignorant?) 18 CIA officers, and 254 marines? Just how far does your tinfoil hat reach over your ears when it comes to disrespecting American lives? So much for Integrity.
Originally Posted by Asfaloth54
You're so stupid that you don't realize that it's your stupid-ass that's being disrespected, ass-lick. You come in here spouting apples-to-oranges comparisons to prove your stupidity; hence, your stupid ass will continue to be disrespected, ass-lick. And there were investigations regarding the 1983 Beirut bombings, and people were held accountable, ass-lick. So go back to your mama's basement and play with yourself, ass-lick. Nobody lied about what happened in Beirut, ass-lick; so, your stupid, lying-ass can just keep eating that crow, you POS liar. W's people had proper security in place, and hildebeest left Ambassador Stephens hung out to die, ass-lick.
lustylad's Avatar
So, in other words, you don't have the Character to respect the deaths of 3 American diplomats and 22 embassy employees all murdered under Bush - because - why again? Respecting the truth doesn't serve your ignorant, biased agenda?

You should be sure to let the families of those Embassy guards who died 'outside the Embassy gate' that you don't consider their deaths as meaningful as the holy grail of Benghazi.... Originally Posted by Asfaloth54

You have the unmitigated gall to speak of CHARACTER here? And to talk about RESPECT for the families of the victims?

Are you fucking kidding me, ass-sloth????

Nobody lied about any of the deaths that occurred under Bush or Reagan. Nobody concealed the truth from the American people for political reasons weeks before a Presidential election, ass-sloth. Nobody under Bush or Reagan lied directly to the grief-stricken faces of the victims' family members 3 days after the attack while standing next to their flag-draped caskets. Nobody under Bush or Reagan perpetrated a cover-up of such monstrous proportions! The POTUS even took his lies to the United Nations 2 weeks after the attack. He embarrassed the entire nation when he gave a speech in which - instead of promising to bring the shitbags who killed our Libyan Ambassador to justice - he cravenly proclaimed "The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam".

How much CHARACTER did hildebeest and Odumbo display in their Benghazi cover-up scheme, ass-sloth? How much RESPECT did they show the victims, the victims' families, and the American people when they lied again and again and again about what really happened in Benghazi, ass-sloth?

If YOU had an ounce of CHARACTER or felt any genuine RESPECT for the victims of the Benghazi attack or had any respect for the truth, you would be just as offended and outraged as I am by the lies we were spoon-fed by hildebeest and Odumbo. And you would be just as determined as I am to expose and call out the liars for their disgusting and disgraceful behavior!



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DPJYBs-eX48
Old-T's Avatar
  • Old-T
  • 10-21-2016, 05:21 PM
You're so stupid that you don't realize that it's your stupid-ass that's being disrespected, ass-lick. You come in here spouting apples-to-oranges comparisons to prove your stupidity; hence, your stupid ass will continue to be disrespected, ass-lick. And there were investigations regarding the 1983 Beirut bombings, and people were held accountable, ass-lick. So go back to your mama's basement and play with yourself, ass-lick. Nobody lied about what happened in Beirut, ass-lick; so, your stupid, lying-ass can just keep eating that crow, you POS liar. W's people had proper security in place, and hildebeest left Ambassador Stephens hung out to die, ass-lick. Originally Posted by I B Hankering
Beirut. Unfortunately some of the people "held responsible" were scape goats sacrificed to protect higher-ups who should have taken responsibility.

But there were other differences, some of which had to do with budget decisions--guessing games about where to spend limited $$ and where to take risks.

Not every death has an evil person behind it, but most the time we do insist that someone be hung.
I B Hankering's Avatar
Beirut. Unfortunately some of the people "held responsible" were scape goats sacrificed to protect higher-ups who should have taken responsibility.

But there were other differences, some of which had to do with budget decisions--guessing games about where to spend limited $$ and where to take risks.

Not every death has an evil person behind it, but most the time we do insist that someone be hung. Originally Posted by Old-T
Per the testimony from the hearings, Stevens was directed to go to Benghazi and establish a permanent post using surplus State Department end of year funds -- before 1 October (the begining of the new fiscal year). Also, per the testimony from the hearings, the decision not to provide adequate and necessary security was a political one and not one based on budgetary constraints.

When did the U.S. start letting down its guard on the anniversary of 9-11? Stevens shouldn't have been directed to go to Benghazi on the anniversary on 9-11 without adequate protection or a back-up plan/team to extricate embassy personnel from a hostile situation on the anniversary of 9-11. Not having a team in position to respond not just in Libya -- but anywhere in that region -- on the anniversary of 9-11 was a fundamental leadership failure.

RE: Beirut. I read Geraghty's book. He was scapegoated. His mission directives put him between a rock and hard spot, but the ROE were his, and his security personnel were not locked-and-loaded. The sentry at the gate might have been able to shoot and kill the truck driver before he crashed into the building if he had had a round chambered.
So is America.

Jim Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisin
Then leave dipshit
lustylad's Avatar
Go for it, LubedAss! The Seven-Six-Two solution! Don't keep us waiting!

dilbert firestorm's Avatar
Go for it, LubedAss! The Seven-Six-Two solution! Don't keep us waiting!

Originally Posted by lustylad
I think lubedass would make a good dancing pinata!!!
Then leave dipshit Originally Posted by Luke_Wyatt
No ,I want to see America become great again. Sine you don't you leave. Besides you're nothing but a burden on our Health Care system.


Jim
No ,I want to see America become great again. Sine you don't you leave. Besides you're nothing but a burden on our Health Care system.


Jim Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisin
Great again in reference to what year(s) Jim?
You're so stupid that you don't realize that it's your stupid-ass that's being disrespected, ass-lick. You come in here spouting apples-to-oranges comparisons to prove your stupidity; hence, your stupid ass will continue to be disrespected, ass-lick. And there were investigations regarding the 1983 Beirut bombings, and people were held accountable, ass-lick. So go back to your mama's basement and play with yourself, ass-lick. Nobody lied about what happened in Beirut, ass-lick; so, your stupid, lying-ass can just keep eating that crow, you POS liar. W's people had proper security in place, and hildebeest left Ambassador Stephens hung out to die, ass-lick. Originally Posted by I B Hankering
Is this poster, asslick, a protégé of the resident dingleberry picker EKIM ?
No ,I want to see America become great again. Sine you don't you leave. Besides you're nothing but a burden on our Health Care system.


Jim Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisin
Lube is hoping that with a shrilLIARy win of the White House, that he won't have to continue to pay for his preparation H lip balm. Even when he buys his multiple cases for each months use, it is still a " financial burden " that Lube feels that the rest of society should have to pay for for him.