considering all the bs he's put up with, can you blame him? Originally Posted by CJ7
If she were that smart she wouldn't have gone on national tv blaming a video. Originally Posted by gnadflyFYI, The original talking points of the CIA had "the attack on Benghazi evolved from a demonstration in Cairo, Egypt". The state department changed the location and gave that to Rice to go on the talk shows with. Do you want to fire the CIA? That was their original analysis. All you have is republicans trying to generate scandal.
FYI, The original talking points of the CIA had "the attack on Benghazi evolved from a demonstration in Cairo, Egypt". The state department changed the location and gave that to Rice to go on the talk shows with. Do you want to fire the CIA? That was their original analysis. All you have is republicans trying to generate scandal. Originally Posted by flghtr65There is nothing these Idiots love more than a good old fashioned conspiracy theory. Hell, we have a dozen or so Jerry Fletchers right here in this forum! You can count Turdyfly among them.
FYI, The original talking points of the CIA had "the attack on Benghazi evolved from a demonstration in Cairo, Egypt". The state department changed the location and gave that to Rice to go on the talk shows with. Do you want to fire the CIA? That was their original analysis. All you have is republicans trying to generate scandal. Originally Posted by flghtr65Hardly. Susan Rice was sent out to sell fake talking points. She should have been smart enough to not to fall for it. She deserves to be thrown under the bus. If Obama wants to surround himself with loyal sycophants go ahead - it only makes his administration look more incompetent.
Uncle Han, there were several attacks on American Embassy's during the the time that Candy Rice was in charge. Originally Posted by flghtr65flghtr65, do yourself a favor a see what Susan Rice's position was when the US embassies in Africa were bombed and how she 'prepared' for them and how she 'reacted' to them.
.Apparent to everyone except the CIA. One more time just for you, the original CIA talking points had "the attack evolved from a demonstration in Cairo, Egypt). You might as well throw the CIA under the bus that was there original analysis. The CIA did not have the word Terror in their original talking points. The state department change a couple of things and then sent her on TV. If you want to throw someone under the bus then throw the CIA under the bus.
It was apparent to everyone but to the Obamabots that it was a terrorist attack by 9/12. She went on the talk shows a several days later. Originally Posted by gnadfly
Uh, that's Condi Rice, and no ambassadors were killed, and as far as I know, President Bush did not ignore the attacks to prepare for a campaign fundraiser, nor did he lie about the reason for the attacks.Embassy's were attacked and people died under Candy's watch. There were 3 congressional hearings, nothing evolved from them. Benghazi was an example of poor intelligence, just like Bush with the WMD's. Sec of Defense, Leon Panatta did not sent the jet fighter because he did not think it would get there in time. A former ambassador and general did an investigation, there was no cover up. Both parties can have trouble with poor intelligence.
Not that I am supporting Bush in any way, shape or fashion. He should be on trial for war crimes. But I wanted to set the record straight.
And besides, didn't we elect Obama because he was different from Bush? Why is it ok if he behaves like Bush? Is Bush the standard we are to expect from our Presidents? I hope not.
Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy