Schiff vows lawsuit for Mueller report if it's not released

The_Waco_Kid's Avatar
They keep coming. Look at the Coast Guard Lieutenant. He was going to go after all of the journalists and create a white homeland. Trump wont say anything bad about him because these are his people. Originally Posted by FrankZappa

you say that like it's a bad thing.
FrankZappa's Avatar
I am getting all of my work done today and tomorrow so I can watch Michael Cohen obliterate Trump and show what a lying ,scheming lowlife Trump is. He is a snake oil salesman and the only way he gets any money is by laundering money through his golf courses for the Russians. He sold out our country and he could shoot someone on main street and his supporters wouldn't care. Trump is such a lousy businessman he bankrupted a casino. He inherited 600 million from his dad and now he lives off Russian money. You ever notice that everyone in his campaign was tied to Russia. In the meantime, he pulled out of the middle east and let Russia take over. He wants to give Ukraine back to Putin, he threatened NATO and wont ever say anything bad about Putin. He pulled out of Syria.

https://www.newyorker.com/news/swamp...tish-golf-club

https://www.wired.com/story/if-trump...-how-it-works/

https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/ar...self-made-myth
Yssup Rider's Avatar
you say that like it's a bad thing. Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid
You say that like it’s not.
  • oeb11
  • 02-25-2019, 12:53 PM
Deflection from what?

Schiff is right.

The Starr Report was made available to the public.

The public paid for Mueller’s investigation. Trump didn’t.

It’s. Fucking. Ours. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

That has been previously covered and documented.

AG Barr has the legal right to review, redact, and release the report as He sees Fit and appropriate. Under law passed by Congress. Schiff can subpoena all his little heart wants - it will wind up in the SC to review the issue of forcing release of a complete report if Barr choses not to do so. A review Schiff will likely Lose.



That being stated - there is great public interest in the report, and pressure to release as much of the document as feasible. AG Barr is aware of those concerns.

Time to cut the waste of bandwidth and wait for the release for the report.
Schiff is loving his moments to Grandstand It!!


It's not F.... Yours!!!!!
By Law!!!!!
But then again, DPST's are not known for their respect for the Constitution when it's provisions are not consonant with DPST ideology!!!
  • oeb11
  • 02-25-2019, 12:55 PM
Almost forgot - Fake news, Nazi, DKYS!!!!
Yssup Rider's Avatar
Name calling again?

You got nothing, oeb11.

And stating opinion as fact is lazy. Why not back up your claims?
  • oeb11
  • 02-25-2019, 01:10 PM
Thank You for the usual illuminating, intellectually rigorous response.

You can do better than that.
Respectfully!
Yssup Rider's Avatar
Thank You for the usual illuminating, intellectually rigorous response.

You can do better than that.
Respectfully! Originally Posted by oeb11
Your “respect” is disingenuous. Oeb11.

And your posts continue to show extreme laziness.
  • oeb11
  • 02-25-2019, 02:54 PM
Try posting something cogent and constructive - rather than mindless name-calling
Thank you YR

I see no response to the synopsis of the legal constraints on AG Barr enacted by Congress!
If You Please!!
themystic's Avatar
Try posting something cogent and constructive - rather than mindless name-calling
Thank you YR

I see no response to the synopsis of the legal constraints on AG Barr enacted by Congress!
If You Please!! Originally Posted by oeb11
So every post that you have DPST and other nonsense, you dont consider that name calling?
  • oeb11
  • 02-25-2019, 03:39 PM
Look in a Mirror!!!
Yssup Rider's Avatar
Try posting something cogent and constructive - rather than mindless name-calling
Thank you YR

I see no response to the synopsis of the legal constraints on AG Barr enacted by Congress!
If You Please!! Originally Posted by oeb11
Where is that synopsis? Are you talking about your unsubstantiated post?

Otherwise I must have missed it, oeb11.

And you seem to be unable to tell the difference between criticism and name calling.

You never checked your PMs, did you?
The_Waco_Kid's Avatar
Deflection from what?

Schiff is right.WRONG.

The Starr Report was made available to the public.

make up yer mind! last month he was Chancellor rapist at Baylor. so is he your rapist or your savior? thnik he'll help Bob find the pee tape??

The public paid for Mueller’s investigation. Trump didn’t.

It’s. Fucking. Ours. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
No. It's. Not.

You say that like it’s not. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
Opinions vary.
  • oeb11
  • 02-25-2019, 05:38 PM
As to the Release of the Mueller report in total to the Public-

Wanting and self-delusion by those demanding it -doth not make it so!
AG Barr is obligated to follow the law as passed by Congress.
If Congress wants to change the law it can vote and ask Trump to sign it!
A discussion from CNN of the applicable statutes:
https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/15/opini...din/index.html



It is important, therefore, to understand the special counsel regulations and Justice Department policy that govern Mueller's investigation and to question Barr about his interpretation of the regulations and those policies.
Reports are referred to in two sections of the regulations: 28 CFR 600.8(c) and 600.9.
Section 600.8 (c) says that, at the conclusion of the special counsel's work, he or she shall provide the attorney general with a confidential report explaining the prosecution or declination decisions reached by the special counsel.
Nowhere in the regulations does it mention releasing or even authorizing the release of the special counsel's closing report to the public or even to Congress.
Simply put, the regulation only authorizes that a confidential report be given to the attorney general. So, when Barr indicates that he will "follow the Special Counsel regulations scrupulously," he could interpret this regulation as denying him the legal authority to release Mueller's report either to Congress or the American public.
Section 600.9 is more complex and provides two bases for disclosure.
Section 600.9 (a) requires that the attorney general notify and explain to the chairman and ranking minority member of the Judiciary Committees of each house of Congress in only three circumstances: (1) upon the appointment of a special counsel; (2) upon the removal of a special counsel; and (3) upon conclusion of the Special Counsel's investigation, including, when the attorney general decides not to allow the special counsel to proceed as he has requested. Nothing more.
Consequently, while the attorney general is authorized to release these reports if he determines their release would be in the public interest, to the extent that release would comply with applicable legal restrictions, this notification portion of the regulation does not directly appear to provide a basis for Barr to release Mueller's entire final report or the results of his work either to Congress or to the American public.
Section 600.9 (c) governs all other releases of information by the special counsel -- to wit, possibly the final report. This section provides that disclosure shall be governed by the "generally applicable Departmental guidelines concerning public comment with respect to any criminal investigation and relevant law." This is in large measure the heart of the matter.
If we learned anything from the controversy over James Comey's press conferences -- where he sharply criticized Hillary Clinton's handling of her emails, and then announced that no charges were warranted -- it is that departmental guidelines foreclose commenting on criminal investigations, especially if the subjects of the investigation are not publicly charged with a crime.
Thus, because departmental policy prohibits Mueller from indicting a sitting President, release of his report (or at least parts of the report) would appear to contravene departmental policy regarding public comment on investigations not resulting in criminal charges. Again, consistent with law, this could provide Barr with a basis to refuse to release Mueller's final report.
Without a detailed understanding of Barr's interpretation of the special counsel regulations and the operative Justice Department policy concerning public comment with respect to criminal investigations, there is no way to know whether Barr's promise to "follow the Special Counsel regulations scrupulously and in good faith," and his belief that it is "very important that the public and Congress be informed of the results of the Special Counsel's work," have any practical meaning.
It will be up to the Senate Judiciary Committee to flesh this out before a final confirmation vote.


No question that the public would like to see the entire report.
Barr will handle the matter under the rule of Law, not the whining of the DPST's!
Patience is advised for all.

Jagger -"You can't always get what You Want!"
Yssup Rider's Avatar
Thanks for posting that oeb11.

Do you want to see what’s in the report?

Do you feel Congress deserves to see what’s in that report?