Rittenhouse Is Dead Meat.

Not guilty across the board. The jury made their decision Originally Posted by NoirMan

You left out "so I was completely wrong, don't understand the law with regard to self defense, and that you will now give up your license to practice law".

This is unquestionably a mistrial. The prosecution should be the ones going to prison, not Rittenhouse. First they get caught tampering with evidence, now hiding witnesses.

Arguing with NoirMan about law would be like arguing with LL or Captain Midnight about economics. You can agree or disagree with him philosophically, but he’ll likely give you better insights than you can get listening to the pundits on CNN or Fox. Originally Posted by Tiny

Care to revise your opinion of NoirMan now Tiny?

I said it would be up to the jury. I also said they could determine it was self defense as that’s a factual determination. What part of what I said was wrong. My opinion as to whether it’s self defense differs from the jury. It took them 24 hours to decide.

I said it would be up to the jury. I also said they could determine it was self defense as that’s a factual determination. What part of what I said was wrong. My opinion as to whether it’s self defense differs from the jury. It took them 24 hours to decide. Originally Posted by NoirMan

Everything!!!!! You are the so called "educated attorney" not the jury. Your opinion proved your bias.

I said it would be up to the jury. I also said they could determine it was self defense as that’s a factual determination. What part of what I said was wrong. My opinion as to whether it’s self defense differs from the jury. It took them 24 hours to decide. Originally Posted by NoirMan

you jabbered away all week he didn't have the right to defend himself because his first attacker rosenbaum was unarmed. you claimed the second attacker huber wasn't armed. so how many times should rittenhouse have let himself get bashed in the head by a skateboard before he was "entitled" to defend himself?


own it sparky.

Attachment 877549

Opps

Care to revise your opinion of NoirMan now Tiny? Originally Posted by HedonistForever

Nope Hedonist, NoirMan knows the law. I wasn't taking sides. We don't know what his specialty is, but he probably does this or something related for a living.

Arguing with NoirMan about law would be like arguing with LL or Captain Midnight about economics. You can agree or disagree with him philosophically, but he’ll likely give you better insights than you can get listening to the pundits on CNN or Fox. Originally Posted by Tiny

Lustylad is a phoney....Captainmidnight is the real deal.

At the end of the day...would you invest your money where CM advised or where that broke ass Lustylad cried about?

Lustylad is a phoney....Captainmidnight is the real deal.

At the end of the day...would you invest your money where CM advised or where that broke ass Lustylad cried about? Originally Posted by WTF

Hmm, Steven Mnuchin or Alan Greenspan? Tough one. I'd probably pick LL for private equity and Captain Midnight to manage my equity and fixed income portfolio.

At the end of the day...would you invest your money where CM advised or where that broke ass Lustylad cried about? Originally Posted by WTF

Lusty is dispensing free investment advice on a hooker board?

Where do I get in line?

He came there with a gun, If you carry a gun you plan on killing some one or shooting it. I have never held a gun and not had it discharge with 1 min of me picking it up.

He came there with a gun, If you carry a gun you plan on killing some one or shooting it. I have never held a gun and not had it discharge with 1 min of me picking it up. Originally Posted by Ripmany

That's the dumbest statement I've ever heard.

Nope Hedonist, NoirMan knows the law. I wasn't taking sides. We don't know what his specialty is, but he probably does this or something related for a living. Originally Posted by Tiny

Say what? He obviously doesn't know the law or he wouldn't be so wrong. Yes, you were taking sides. There is no other way to take what you said. You were implying that he was right and that I was wrong. But no big deal, I think you are a stand up kinda guy.



Pretty sure is "specialty" isn't self defense law. Because somebody does something for a living, like the prosecutors in this case, doesn't mean they are good at it or know what they are talking about.