This may shake the Big Tech Commies up

Mika Brzezinski on idea of Elon Musk owning Twitter:

"...he could have undermined the messaging so much that he can actually control exactly what people think –– and that is OUR job."

She actually said this out loud

Originally Posted by berryberry

She obviously knows what’s she’s talking about for once. That IS their job. Dopes swallow their propaganda. It’s evident on this hooker board everyday.

Poison pill swallowed

*TWITTER ADOPTS LIMITED DURATION SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS PLAN

Can't wait for the class action suits by shareholders against the Twitter Board for screwing them out of a nice payday. Elon Musk has publicly revealed Twitter management for the corrupt regime protecting Democrats that they are Originally Posted by berryberry

... It doesn't stop shareholders from selling their shares
to Musk. ... And of course the Fiduciary Responsibility
of the board there. How will the board actually reject
a higher offour? ... Thet're just trying to buy time
- some time to find a "money Angel" to perchase it
before Musk does.

### Salty

She obviously knows what’s she’s talking about for once. That IS their job. Dopes swallow their propaganda. It’s evident on this hooker board everyday. Originally Posted by bambino

That is true Bam. Although the way many libtards are in hiding these days, maybe a few have woken up to the reality with each passing story and more evidence on more stories coming out that they have been lied to by the mainstream media and the DNC.

Either that or those libtards are just plain embarrassed by Senile Biden and his band of fellow Democrats

... It doesn't stop shareholders from selling their shares
to Musk. ... And of course the Fiduciary Responsibility
of the board there. How will the board actually reject
a higher offour? ... Thet're just trying to buy time
- some time to find a "money Angel" to perchase it
before Musk does.

### Salty Originally Posted by Salty Again

It doesn't stop shareholders from selling to Musk Salty - but the poison pill works to dilute his shares once he goes over 15%

Where the Board is open to liability is by not putting the offer to buy shares to a shareholder vote. There are law firms that live for this so these will happen if the Board rejects the offer with no shareholder vote

Now Musk is a smart guy - and he already stated he has a Plan B. Only takes 4 people/entities to accumulate over 50% of the stock without anyone triggering the 15% poison pill threshold. Musk is connected to other heavy hitters. And there are a number of hedge funds out there who could be looking at this as a way to make a quick buck by taking a big position and selling out to Musk

There is also always the option of a proxy fight

And those are just 2 off the top of my head. But it depends on how far Musk wants to push it. He has already exposed Twitter management for the corrupt biased regime they are - so he has already won. But that doesn't solve the issue of restoring free speech to Twitter - so it will be interesting to see the next move

Glenn Greenwald - Yesterday was a flagship day in corporate media. It was the day they were forced to explicitly state what has long been clear: they not only favor censorship but desperately crave and depend on it.

Even if Musk doesn't buy Twitter, never forget what yesterday revealed.

In US culture, we're inculcated from childhood that censorship is bad. So of course nobody -- especially journalists -- wants to say: "I favor censorship."

That's why they need euphemisms like "content moderation": to pretend it's about bots, abuse, etc. rather than ideology.

Everyone knows they are lying. Nobody cares about Twitter censoring bots or spam. That's not what this is about.

The social media censorship people care about is 100% ideological: banning dissent on COVID, the Biden emails, culture war debates, etc. That's what's at stake.

Let's put it this way:

On Google/YouTube, Facebook and Twitter, you are free to say the 2000 and 2016 elections were stolen and fraudulent. You can't say that about 2020.

Before the 2020 election, you weren't allowed to post reporting on the Biden emails.

It's all ideological.

Throughout the COVID pandemic, you weren't allowed to question the efficacy of cloth masks. You weren't allowed to interrogate the origins of the virus. You weren't allowed to debate vaccines or lockdowns. No dissent from Fauci/WHO was allowed.

The censorship is 100% political.

Social media was heralded as an innovation that would liberate individuals from centralized control by the state and oligarchical power over their speech.

It has become the exact opposite: the most powerful tool of information control and speech constraints ever devised.

How dumb do you have to be to believe that journalists - who work at Bloomberg and the Bezos-owned WPost or Comcast or CNN - are worried about billionaires controlling media (��).

They're only petrified that the *wrong* billionaire, one who may not censor for them, might reign.

.. No worrys... Musk not-onley has a Plan B - but a Plan C also.

The Board there knows it's on nothing but borrowed time now.

#### Salty

This is the way !!! DeSantis is the best - always playing offense in a sensible way

NOW - Gov. DeSantis wants to hold Twitter's board and directors accountable for potentially injuring Florida's pension fund.

https://twitter.com/i/status/1516451648079638531

if the 2020 election was clean, why would the media & left be so terrified of losing control of Twitter to Elon Musk⁩? They believe along with voter fraud, that censoring news was key to ⁦Senile Biden⁩’s victory


https://www.wsj.com/articles/twitter...on_featst_pos1

Netflix tanked today. Florida is stripping Disney of their self governing status. CNN cancelled its streaming program today. Goodbye Chris Wallace. Again!!!!


They’re all going down.

Netflix tanked today. Florida is stripping Disney of their self governing status. CNN cancelled its streaming program today. Goodbye Chris Wallace. Again!!!!


They’re all going down. Originally Posted by bambino

Go Woke, go broke

You love to see it

... The reason they hired-on Chris Wallace was to lure
"republicans" to the site - in hopes that CNN+ might
be able to change the minds of voting republicans.

Their problem? ... GROSSLY OVER-ESTIMATING how many
Democrat supporters would sign-up for the site.

The onley thing keeping CNN afloat at all is George Soros.

### Salty

JUST IN: Elon Musk has secured a $46.5 billion financing commitment to acquire Twitter Inc and is considering starting a tender offer for its outstanding shares, a filing with U.S. regulators showed.

... Good for Him!

.... Surely might be the "Plan B" that I mentioned.

#### Salty

Well what do you know - this is what happens when you get big shareholders on your side and say you will move forward with a tender offer

Twitter Board "More Receptive To A Deal", Meeting With Musk Today As It Re-Examines Bid

https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/tw...e-examines-bid

OH BABY

NEW YORK, April 25 (Reuters) - Twitter Inc (TWTR.N) is poised to agree a sale to Elon Musk for around $43 billion in cash, the price the CEO of Tesla has called his "best and final" offer for the social media company, people familiar with the matter said.

Twitter may announce the $54.20-per-share deal later on Monday once its board has met to recommend the transaction to Twitter shareholders, the sources said, adding it was still possible the deal could collapse at the last minute.

https://www.reuters.com/technology/e...es-2022-04-25/

Cue crying libtards in 3, 2, 1 . . .