Misogyny Prevalent Here - Need More White Knights Here

...I was on ASPD and it got just as nasty as ECCIE, only difference ECCIE is more fair....you old fuckers that are so grateful some fat middle aged whore will touch your dick ...that you'll battle the board for them.... Originally Posted by Tony Gambino

I'm not sure why people tend to remember ASPD with rose colored glasses because it could be completely vicious. Plus, it was a different type of client base, and sex workers, then today. In a fashion, the viciousness was even more severe because the members on there, in many ways, were of a different socioeconomic level.

I'm not sure where white knights are limited to WK'ing only "fat middle aged whores" because I see men who defend women of all sizes.

Either way, I'll agree with the idea that Eccie IS more fair than ASPD was in dealing with the membership. Back during the ASPD days, moderating was much different, or so it seemed.

What an interesting topic, though.

EW

EXACTLY!!!!
I still wonder (almost worry) about what is being said that I can't see. I am a very confident woman (my own biggest fan even), but I still find myself almost self conscious about the possibility of negative comments on a review. Originally Posted by Sinful Pleasure

At TER a provider can read the ROS of her reviews. If she's done her screening well and knows the reviewer, the reviewer is aware that he will be fact-checked by the provider.

No such right given to girls here. This creates an opportunity for abuse of women in general and a provider in particular. If the provider can't rebut negative information about her because she's not allowed to know what is said about her in the ROS or MLR, then an atmosphere of discrimination against women evolves, as has occurred here at eccie.

I'm sure I'm right about the misogyny here, and its dominance here--it exists in the ROS of reviews, the BCD comments, and in the MLR.

Compare the rules here to Angie's List, where vendors can read what is said about them. TER allows providers to do so.

Not eccie. Why?

Chung Tran did that? His misogyny is on display bcd as well. Sorry that happened to you. The hobby world will attract misogynists and even rapists and killers to these boards. Let the men here who who want to create an inviting atmosphere where woman feel safe to participate as equal members. Then you ladies can feel safe to discuss the misogynistic behavior of members like Chung Tran.

Not sure what white knight means but the gentleman makes so much sense. Thank you otherwise the trolls will always represent for the lowlife..Unlike Tran who was disgustingly one of the first to blow up my PM to let me know that noone will want to see me because of my tatoos and because I use words like "stayn safe" to describe getting to know me. Smh
Be real. Originally Posted by Mera Jadore

At TER we can read our own reviews.

HOWEVER.... refuting false information there is like pissing in the wind. They don't care. You can prove a review is completely false and never happened and they don't care. And the rating system... you have to offer specific services in order to even qualify for some ratings.. to me, that is about as misogynistic as it gets.

Dude here, if you like it so much in TER, go there, not here....
So you graduated here from false pics to troll here?
Here here heeeere!
Or there?

At TER... refuting false information there is like pissing in the wind. They don't care. Originally Posted by GracePreston

It isn't possible for a moderator at TER to know enough about what happened BCD to make a judgement as to the truth. Whatever TER may be, Eccie is a board that gives free reign to misogynists. It's apparently the owner's determination that it's best to let the membership define the community. So its up to real men who love women and who are grateful that they will provide for us to push back against the abuse of women here.

There are threads here that you ladies either can't read or can't comment on... apparently many, many eccie men get their thrills picking up down-on-their luck women off the streets and then bragging about their exploits to cheers as they use words like "whore" and worse to describe a human being who happens to have a vagina--and perhaps has been the victim of abuse. There are members here looking to exploit female victims who don't post where you ladies can see it.

Not sure what white knight means but the gentleman makes so much sense. Thank you otherwise the trolls will always represent for the lowlife..Unlike Tran who was disgustingly one of the first to blow up my PM to let me know that noone will want to see me because of my tatoos and because I use words like "stayn safe" to describe getting to know me. Smh
Be real. Originally Posted by Mera Jadore

that is quite a spin you impart.. I dare you to post my exact PM openly.. feel free, you have my permission.. when people read it in context, it will look as tame as a newly-shorn Lamb.

She can't post private correspondence, Chung... but of course you knew that when you threw down the gauntlet and challenged her to do so. So your challenge is dishonest.

Now, I've read your BCD comments, and others in MLR. What the lady who charged you with harrassment says is consistant with your posting history.

that is quite a spin you impart.. I dare you to post my exact PM openly.. feel free, you have my permission.. when people read it in context, it will look as tame as a newly-shorn Lamb. Originally Posted by Chung Tran

apparently many, many eccie men get their thrills picking up down-on-their luck women off the streets and then bragging about their exploits to cheers as they use words like "whore" and worse to describe a human being who happens to have a vagina--and perhaps has been the victim of abuse. Originally Posted by Good Brando

"apparently"? do they or not? why not post some examples?

they actually said "Whore" on a Whore Board? I'm in shock, I need to re-read these threads and RTM some of them.. you seriously just said some people say "Whore"?

Dude, really? do you see what we call each other? and ourselves?

She can't post private correspondence, Chung... but of course you knew that when you threw down the gauntlet and challenged her to do so. So your challenge is dishonest.

Now, I've read your BCD comments, and others in MLR. What the lady who charged you with harrassment says is consistant with your posting history. Originally Posted by Good Brando

nope, it is not.. I would post the pm myself, except that I deleted it. I do not harass anyone Brando.. I mentioned tattoos in my PM, so what? I saw Spanishbeauty and loved her, she has twice as many Tattoos as the new lady.
for all we know about you, you are a Troll.. been here 3 months, 2 reviews? anyone can reference ASPD.

http://eccie.net/showthread.php?p=10...post1058376154

hey Brando, isn't this the most disgusting mysogonistic post?

funny that it's a Provider ad.. you would have never known.

hey Brando, look at what the ladies say about us? (post #28).. I think the comment is funny, but you should be outraged, no?

http://eccie.net/showthread.php?p=10...post1058376039

you are a Fraud Sir..

There are threads here that you ladies either can't read or can't comment on... Originally Posted by Good Brando

Brando, many ladies here CAN read and comment.. you may be one of those ladies.

you sure got quiet really fast.

Hopefully some ladies will post--Chung, I pmd you so that others can comment without this thread becoming one anout a particular misogynist, but stays a thread about misogyny on the board.

I notice that no racial hate speech is tolerated at eccie--but hate speech directed at females is tolerated. Is it because the ladies here are providers, and therefore considered 2nd class members?