Bristol's words of wisdom :)

Oh, give me a fucking break.

It's not a "woman's world" until she starts writing the check unless you want to surrender it to her. A woman can control HER OWN WORLD but she can't control mine unless I let her.

I understand and support Bristol's first post, the guy was a jerk. Guess what, sometimes the providers are bigger jerks. I don't have a problem with Bristol giving her side of it and rebutting the review (which I couldn't find, BTW, but I didn't look very hard), that's what she's supposed to do and she did it with class and in the right forum.

But...

Put in our place??

Fuck that. Put that INDIVIDUAL in his place, sure. Rebut what Bristol thinks are invalid claims, sure. But put "we as hobbiest" in our place? What a load of shit.

I just finished reading a post by BustyBianca that said "Don't go anywhere in KS". Why? Because you didn't screen properly? Guess what, I live in KS. If you don't want to come here, don't. The line of providers IN KS is deep and gorgeous and they have no problems taking my money.

I'm sympathetic with the things providers have to put up with and the jobs they have but to be honest, they're not (as a group) a very reliable bunch of employees either. Sure, the favorites that are here and most of them post are not in that category, that's why they're here, that's why we love them, but as a group a lot will never make employee of the month at McDonalds.

Put us as hobbiests in our place?

I treat the ladies I choose to see with respect and more. I gladly pay their published rates without haggling if I choose to call them. I'm on time, clean, and provide a safe environment for our times together.

Maybe YOU needed to be put in your place. I don't so don't speak for me.

Jack Originally Posted by ksjack

thanks jack.... i pay my bills too and behave well also... i dont need put in place either..

thanks jack.... i pay my bills too and behave well also... i dont need put in place either.. Originally Posted by jaybee

Ditto.

I'll volunteer to let Bristol put me in my place or her place or any other place she wants on any day!

She has handled this situation with class, dignity and facts, congrats to her.

I'll volunteer to let Bristol put me in my place or her place or any other place she wants on any day!

She has handled this situation with class, dignity and facts, congrats to her. Originally Posted by scorpio31

Scorpio, I agree Bristol "did it right" and as I said, I have no problems with her post at all.

What I'm a little tired of is having all of us lumped together to the point another hobbyist posts that we need to be "put in our place". This one asshole that treated Bristol badly? Sure. All of us? No.

I'm also tired of the attitude that the ladies make all the rules and it's their world. No, it's not. They make the rules FOR THEM. I can either choose to see them, or not, therefore I make the rules FOR ME. If the two sets of rules can happily come together, great, if not, tough.

I do know this. I can go without screwin' for a lot longer than the ladies can go without eatin' from the money I pay them so no, they don't make all the rules and no, it's not their world.

They can only exercise control over their little part of it.

Thread hijack over, no more from me on the subject in this thread.

Jack

I don't have a problem with Bristol giving her side of it and rebutting the review (which I couldn't find, BTW, but I didn't look very hard) Originally Posted by ksjack

I think this is it: http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=280450

I think this is it: http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=280450 Originally Posted by KCQuestor

Thanks KC, that's why I couldn't find it since it had been moved.

Again, Bristol, I think you handled this completely properly and with class.

Jack

"...The one reference that does respond to me has no reviews and sends me a email with the same exact bad grammar you email me with. ..."

I thought 'mirroring' was the greatest form of flattery. He and his reference were two peas in a pod. They sat across the aisle from one another growing up. It was mere coincidence that they had the same last name and basic features.

Malwoody, it is never the 130 emails, per se, that gets one in trouble, but the fact there were over 130. It's that 131st one that goes down wrong every time. That is why I limit myself to 129, especially when corresponding with the IRS. Originally Posted by bartipero

I love it! I should have added that to my list. 129 emails okay, 131 bad

Thanks KC, that's why I couldn't find it since it had been moved.

Again, Bristol, I think you handled this completely properly and with class.

Jack Originally Posted by ksjack

Thank you! I agree with all the posts up right now. Obviously I have not lumped "all you guys" together just yet because I am still here. Even after this I still have the nagging feeling that 99.9% of you guys I would like