Is a $500 provider really that much better than a $200 provider?

The original thread was the quality difference in providers at $200 vs $500 price points. Some posts here think volumes are equivalent between low rate and high rate providers. I'd disagree for the most part with that assumption, with few exceptions. I've never even looked at $500 so I don't know what that Ferrari experience is like, but I do know that a half-cute provider w/ at least half her teeth left doing $60 QVs all day is running a conveyor belt of cocks to her door vs a $500 provider certainly is not.

'Nuff said

As far as the hobby goes, the restaurant metaphor has a huge flaw. Sometimes, you get surprised in the Taco Bell drive through with wagyu. Sometimes, Del Frisco's gives you Taco Bell shits. Why would I pay someone I've never met $500 an hour? But that's just me and how I like to spend my money, waldt

I have run the gamut from 75/60 to 900/60, and I can honestly say the actual physical act of sex itself really is not that different. What most of us want is just the physical satisfaction of an orgasm. Whether free, at 75, or at 900, that physical release is the same for me.

But what one does get when paying above the 400 mark is better ambience for sure. Usually at Hotel ZaZa, not Extended Stay; at an apartment that has a doorman and is nicely furnished because the person actually lives there and it is not just a work place; the provider will have whatever it is you like to drink waiting for you instead of you bringing it to them; her lingerie will be from Agent Provacateur and impeccable, etc. And, the truth is, it is the psychological satisfaction of just knowing you can pay 500 or more for the session that might make it a better experience for some.

So from my point of view only, and having considerable experience at both ends of the monetary spectrum in this hobby world, if all you want is an orgasm, price is not the determining factor that makes one better than the other. It is the psychology behind the act, all the little mind games that take place in our head that make one experience better than another.

So pay whatever it is you can afford to pay; enjoy the experience; and just have fun out there. Stop trying to rationalize or understand why other people pay what they pay, charge what they charge, or do what they do. Why do you care?

Well said, Gbsfl

I'd pay up to a grand for a great doubles experience. Now, if I go over the $$$$$ mark, I go doubles. Luv it!!!!

Back to the restaurant metaphor, I hate In & Out Burger. I need time to "work-up" an appetite. So QV's don't usually work. So no sub-$ visits for me.

However, I've had one of the best possible experiences at $$ 1/2 hour session, and a great hour session with a $$$$$ provider.

But one of the most disappointing session was with a $$$$$$ per hour provider. She was just about physically flawless, however, it was like humping a life-size silicon barbie doll with the "1000 yard stare."

I've sampled the high end since I normally buy 1.5 or 2 hour sessions, thus the hit on my budget is equal to renting 250-300 girls for longer time.

The one thing I've noticed is I'm more likely to get more time and attention even though the agreed time was one hour. The $500+ ones I've seen are not rushed (or late) vs some of the 200-250 where it's clearly an assembly line. Fortunately I've never heard "NEXT" as I go out the door, but I'm guessing it's just a matter of time.

I'll take a 2-250 an hour woman between the ages of 28-45 any fucking day of the week over a 500 an hour 22-30 year old. The two 500 an hour girls that I'm aware of here in Dallas are also heavily tatted up and one talks a little ghetto from what I've heard...I expect alot more for 500 bucks ijs (I'm sure both of those girls are total sweethearts but I want physical perfection for 5)

Hi. I've never been able to afford a $500 provider. There are plenty of very attractive providers with good reviews that offer $200 sessions. Is there a big difference between them? Originally Posted by Biff Biffington

Not really a BIG Difference. It's the provider who caters to hobby fellows who are willing to pay that much, its not really special, but whatever works. Some of the best looking and best times I had was with providers in the $200 $300 range. If something is valued more or cost more you think it is better, NOT, but to each his own, it's psychological.

I respectfully disagree...never had a "bad" orgasm but I've had some where the girl knew how to make it last longer or more intense. And they were the 250 girls.

If a girl has been 400-500 for a few years, she either:
A. Knows what she's doing.
B. Has a clientele of rich guys where money isn't a factor.

It's all over the place. Check to see how long she's been doing this. I'm not seeing a Newbie with $350 tag unless her early reviews are great, depending on who is doing the reviewing. Doesn't matter how hot she is. Originally Posted by Prolongus

I agree with you.
You never had a bad orgasm but some girls know how to make it last.
This is the destination vs. the journey concept I was trying to get him to figure out.
But like you, I find the $250 or less girls just fine.
I doubt I'd go $350 and know for sure I won't go more.
Olivia Nin is at a high price point that although I saw her lots when she was reasonably priced, I won't go back. She is a fine lay and get's results, but there are lots of others out there that can do the same at half the price.
Good thing there are so many women for us to chose from!
We can all find what works best for us.

If you ask Trump there's nothing he can't solve with money. As for the original question at hand. I feel a provider asking for 500 seems greedy. Idk maybe its just me as "cheap thrill" or something. But as far as I personally see it I'm not sure that there is a whole lot that 500 would get you. Originally Posted by Sweet Dreamy Holly

$500 gets you a girl who you never could get in the real world fucking you like she loves you.

It ain't greedy, it's the marketplace.

I kind of liken this discussion to the 300.00 haircut. Never had one, but wonder is it that much better than the 25.00 haircut? Is it pretty much the same, but you can brag about getting a 300.00 haircut?

I would feel bad for the provider that I saw for $500 because there would be no way for her to live up to my unrealistic expectations of what 60 minutes of sex for that much money should be like.

I've seen providers range from $.5 to 1k (1k was in Vegas bar girl, I stupid drunk and young). cost doesn't change quality... most of lady's $$$$+, I don't even remember... ones I remember are between $$ and $$$$,,,, and the best was $$.5

But like you, I find the $250 or less girls just fine. I doubt I'd go $350 and know for sure I won't go more.
Olivia Nin is at a high price point that although I saw her lots when she was reasonably priced, I won't go back. She is a fine lay and get's results, but there are lots of others out there that can do the same at half the price.
Good thing there are so many women for us to chose from!
We can all find what works best for us. Originally Posted by dallaswill

I've seen a few (G.F. for one) that were 200-250 and shot up when they became popular. Who can blame them for raising their rates? The experience of seeing a girl when she was 200-250 and is now 400-500 didn't necessarily make me think she is too hi-priced now. It made me think I paid 200-250 back then and she is now out of my budget range.

I kind of liken this discussion to the 300.00 haircut. Never had one, but wonder is it that much better than the 25.00 haircut? Is it pretty much the same, but you can brag about getting a 300.00 haircut? Originally Posted by Dignan

There is a difference between getting your hair cut at a local self taught barber versus a professional trained from a well known salon school, and that's consistency. Sure, maybe you might find a guy that can cut hair really well for a low price, but that's hard to find, and for some people they would rather pay for the combination of the experience and consistency they find at the higher price ranges.