Swiftboating.. Veterans for a Strong America only "one guy" who is a former republican operative

As a former Swift Boat Sailor, I am sick and tired of the politicians, news media, and other groups using the term Swift Boated. I lost 4 good friends serving on Swift Boats, and have physical and mental wounds from my service. It totaly diminises the service and sacrafice of the men who served and died! Originally Posted by boxxer

Agreed, and thank you for your service.

BigTurd is right that W lost his focus, but wrong saying Obama restored the focus. Obama followed W's policies almost to the letter, after he promised he wouldn't. Yeah, he got bin Laden, which was more of a "feel good" victory than a tactical one. But any President would have done that, as soon as they had the intel. It's not as big a deal as it's now being made out to be.

Obama was there, I saw him. He used the secret government teleporter to go there and back. It was actually Obama in Columbia that stiffed the hooker; teleporter once again.

No, you are a bigoted, partisan idiot to whom the truth does not matter.

You are cut from the same tired, dishonest cloth as is Joel Arends and as were the "Swiftboat Veterans for Lies".

Their commercials were funded in part ($250,000) by Bob Perry, a Texas home builder who was never in the Swiftboat Command and never verified a single line of the the ads. Originally Posted by Little Stevie

God bless Bob Perry, a patriot and a hero. He helped keep a dishonorable man out of the White House

Your 'daddy' (uncle/cousin/etc.) had nothing to do with it, Ekim the Inbred. It truly is a pity that you cannot comprehend elemental facts, Ekim the Inbred. Saddam Hussein was in violation of multiple UN Sanctions, and the WMD Commission and the Butler report both indicate that the intelligence community was correct in suggesting that Saddam was probably seeking to re-arm his military forces with WMD. That conclusion is, in part, based on these known facts: 1) Saddam had had WMD in the past. 2) Saddam had strong incentives to reconstitute his arsenal. 3) He had the money to refinance such a reconstitution. 4) He had trained, competent technicians who could reconstitute his stockpile of WMDs. 5) He had the necessary materiel on hand to proceed with such a reconstitution. 6) He repeatedly stalled and deceived the inspectors leading intelligence specialists to surmise he was re-arming with WMD. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

You just proved what I have been saying about you all along.got the IQ of a rock,This was one statement in GWB's rants about going to war with Iraq

You just proved what I have been saying about you all along.got the IQ of a rock,This was one statement in GWB's rants about going to war with Iraq Originally Posted by ekim008

So you are arguing that Bush used report findings from 2004 and 2005 as a 'justification' to declare war on Iraq in 2003? Ekim the Inbred, you are more cerebrally challenged than was first evident.

BTW, Ekim the Inbred, your 'daddy' (uncle/cousin/etc.) still had nothing to do with it.

So you are arguing that Bush used report findings from 2004 and 2005 as a 'justification' to declare war on Iraq in 2003? Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Yes, Oh Reading Impaired one, that is exactly what he is saying. And he is absolutely correct.

Yes, Oh Reading Impaired one, that is exactly what he is saying. And he is absolutely correct. Originally Posted by Old-T

Your stupidity speaks for itself.

Your stupidity speaks for itself. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Oh my!

You probably really believe that. How sad.

Oh my!

You probably really believe that. How sad. Originally Posted by Old-T

.
"Your stupidity speaks for itself."