Why no joy for African-American Men?

How bout this one, she will see anyone but hispanics. Go figure,??

http://kc.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts...ut-27/11943313 Originally Posted by oldman49

She should be so luck that anyone with a brown dick would consider her.

I think a lot of it is NO AA=PIMP (there is a lot of evidence for this) And beyond that just preference. A lot of guys don't see AA girls just because of preference. Not because they have pimps..... Most guys try not to see a girl who has a pimp period. Just like when ladies set age limits 40+ etc.... Its all preference. Even though you are getting a service and feel that your $ is just as good as the next, the provider has to be able to perform and if she isn't into it, the service will just suck. Just Saying.....m2c

What is wrong with personal preferences? The fucktards discriminate, too. Some may not see spinners, or bbws, or trannies, or Asians, of MILFs, etc ...

+1 pyramider

What is wrong with personal preferences? The fucktards discriminate, too. Some may not see spinners, or bbws, or trannies, or Asians, of MILFs, etc ... Originally Posted by pyramider

I think a lot of it is NO AA=PIMP (there is a lot of evidence for this) And beyond that just preference. A lot of guys don't see AA girls just because of preference. Not because they have pimps..... Most guys try not to see a girl who has a pimp period. Just like when ladies set age limits 40+ etc.... Its all preference. Even though you are getting a service and feel that your $ is just as good as the next, the provider has to be able to perform and if she isn't into it, the service will just suck. Just Saying.....m2c Originally Posted by kcjimmy

I don't like seeing ugly providers or providers with no ass... or ones who don't answer their phones. I like seeing black providers but had run into quite a few of them who had a long list of "I don't do that's"... or simply gave a very lackluster experience. I don't make the generalization that all black providers are going to suck, it just means I have to do better research ahead of time.

I got into a debate once with a lady who said she would see me, even though she doesn't normally see black men. I asked her why and she said it was out of fear of rape, getting beaten up, or things along those lines. The black guys she had seen in the area she was from were "scary" but I seemed "harmless" so I was cool. Normally I would take offense at being categorized as harmless but the girl could give a good BBBJ so I simply responded with some facts... in aggravated assault, whites led blacks 2-1 in arrests; in forcible-rape cases, whites led all racial and ethnic groups by more than 2-1. And in larceny theft, whites led blacks, again, more than 2-1. It is one thing to have a preference with respect to clients... but don't base them on ignorance.

I simply responded with some facts... in aggravated assault, whites led blacks 2-1 in arrests; in forcible-rape cases, whites led all racial and ethnic groups by more than 2-1. And in larceny theft, whites led blacks, again, more than 2-1. It is one thing to have a preference with respect to clients... but don't base them on ignorance. Originally Posted by AllThisMeat

Very enlightening. As a sociology major, I love stats. We can't always take things (or people!) at face value. We must do our own research and make our own conclusions. If I listened to every fear random providers and hobbyists have, I wouldn't see anyone.

Here ya go Makayla... I got my stats from the 2009 census results on the subject: http://www.census.gov/compendia/stat...es/12s0325.pdf

Here ya go Makayla... I got my stats from the 2009 census results on the subject: http://www.census.gov/compendia/stat...es/12s0325.pdf Originally Posted by AllThisMeat

Oh, sweetie, I hope you don't think I was questioning you. Quite the contrary! I was applauding you for bringing out the numbers. It really does help illustrate the point!

Too many people just take minimal pieces of information and grow their own stereotypes and conclusions from there.

XoXo

Well, the conclusion for the illustration isn't quite accurate when thoroughly analyzed, which I'm not doing here either, but am noting an example of why not.

First, the thing to note about that statistical reference is that it represents arrest for crimes not charged, a big difference for a variety of reasons. Next, if you calculate it by percentage of the population blacks will average in higher as a percentage of their racial subset than whites, which is to say one could conclude they are more prone to crime than others. The link below is to total population figures. (There isn't a significant difference for illustrative purposes, but this a 2013 chart in population vs. 2009 on the arrests, so one would do far more for accuracy than I am to be more than illustrative.) Just keep in mind on average we are all Chinese, so statistics are prone to misuse and incorrect interpretations.
http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/00000.html

The point is it's not easily understood and is a highly debated statistical issue than just a few shots can cover.

As for the no AA issue, I've been told by a number of women of all races that the black guys in general are crass, disrespectful, unreasonably demanding and put out way too much 'game.' There are the other reasons stated, personal preferences and outright discrimination to add in, too; and certainly the bad guys spoil it for the good guys by supporting a stereotype not fair to them, but it's what it is.

It seems like every few months this is brought up and all sorts of crap is stirred up.

Was that the intent of the OP?

Whites led all racial and ethnic groups by more than 2-1. And in larceny theft, whites led blacks, again, more than 2-1. It is one thing to have a preference with respect to clients... but don't base them on ignorance. Originally Posted by AllThisMeat

Black males are only 6% of the total U.S. population. To exclude kids, adult black males over 18 are roughly 4%, I think. Yet they *somehow* seem to be exceptionally good at getting arrested and getting STDs. Get it now?

"The rate of new infections among black men was the highest of any group by race and sex — more than
six times that of white men (103.6 v. 15.8 per 100,000)." --CDC


That said, I like it when an ad on Backpage reads NO BLACK MEN because it means that the ad wasn't posted by uncle Leo.