A couple of things.
What's interesting is you like to twist things. This isn't from the MSN.
Another thing is that I seldom, if at all, quote the MSM.
The article has multiple disingenuous statements, incorrectly reiterates talking points, uses numerous un-named sources that claim they heard intelligence officers plotting the downfall of the sitting president while surrounded by hundreds of trained observers, and also claims those overheard comments were reported but ignored till now.
You believe what you want to. I'm skeptical of any story with no facts and "un-named sources" supplying all information. All this supplied just now, by the lying liars, with all the issues I've listed.
I'm not going to go over this point by point.
Because there is no point in doing that. I've supplied links that debunk claims you've made multiple times. It doesn't even slow you down. That's what you and your ilk do.
You have your own capitulation statement.
"If you say so" acknowledges you have no real response.
Originally Posted by Munchmasterman
if you say so.