Sorry and embarrassed to post this. The Scientific Fundamentalist: Liberals are more intelligent than conservatives

Liberals intelligent?........I present Shelia Jackson Lee.

Liberals intelligent?........I present Shelia Jackson Lee. Originally Posted by The2Dogs

She doesn't count. She's a blue dog dem.

You are truly bizarre, InZanybore. So Obama is like Jesus, eh? When did Jesus tell anyone to lobby government for programs? When did Jesus ever say that you should demand other people turn over their money involuntarily in order for government to distribute? When did Jesus lie about his intentions or actions? When did Jesus ever try to cover up wrongdoing by himself or his followers?

Jesus wouldn't side with any political party. He'd be way above that. He would live his life, and do what He thought was right regardless of what government did.

Obama is like Jesus? Only in a deranged, bizarre, Kool-aid sotted mind. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

I'm ok with the insults. Remember Jesus was crucified.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencete...an-nature.html
The man who came up with this hypothesis is apparently an ultra liberal from the UK that also thinks that atheists are more intelligent than theists, that beautiful people have more daughters and men with higher IQ's are less likely to cheat.
OK. Bases on this board that last one may have some merit... Originally Posted by boardman

Personally I think he got the atheists are more intelligent than theists right!

By the way, my IQ is above 140. . Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

A man with a self proclaimed IQ of 140+ has bragged on this board about running around a hot Ship in the Navy with a bunch of Marines because he wanted to prove he had what it took to be a Marine , yet all he really had to do was join the Marines! I do not know about your IQ score JD but your common sense score is in the negative!

Personally I think he got the atheists are more intelligent than theists right! Originally Posted by WTF

Darwin, Isaac Newton, Copernicus, Galileo, Georges Lemaître and Mendel were all "believers".

She doesn't count. She's a blue dog dem. Originally Posted by Zanzibar789

??????? really? I think you've just destroyed any argument you've ever had, or will, about anything with that statement.

Darwin, Isaac Newton, Copernicus, Galileo, Georges Lemaître, Pavlov and Mendel were all "believers". Originally Posted by I B Hankering

That is a very fine list of outliers!

That is a very fine list of outliers!




Originally Posted by WTF

Correction: Pavlov became an atheist while at seminary.

Let's be patient, folks.

Perhaps it would be wise to wait for Professor Gruber to speak to this issue before rendering a judgment.

By the way, my IQ is above 140. Yes, you won't believe it (and neither will the rest of the idiots) but since I know it is true and you can't accept it, I can be pretty smug about how dumb you really are. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA AAAAA!

Nobody would believe that YOU would post anything different?

Carry on JDIdiot. You were the first identified member of the Idiot Klan, errr, Clan. The first dull star in the firmament.

And the one of the most redundant spammers in this community.

So no, you're lying. And nobody accepts it.

Go back to your remedial English class, swabbie.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA AAAAA!

Correction: Pavlov became an atheist while at seminary. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Darwin had this to say:

In my most extreme fluctuations I have never been an Atheist in the sense of denying the existence of a God. I think that generally (and more and more as I grow older), but not always, that an Agnostic would be the more correct description of my state of mind. - See more at: http://publicdomainreview.org/2011/0....A0c8zWzE.dpuf

And who wrote, administered, analyzed, and reported these "studies"? Originally Posted by LexusLover

The backgammon club at Prairieview A&M, thats who.
If you seek a liberal answer to a liberal question go to a liberal.

Darwin had this to say:

In my most extreme fluctuations I have never been an Atheist in the sense of denying the existence of a God. I think that generally (and more and more as I grow older), but not always, that an Agnostic would be the more correct description of my state of mind. - See more at: http://publicdomainreview.org/2011/0....A0c8zWzE.dpuf Originally Posted by WTF

Good article.

Leading Darwin expert and founder of Darwin Online, John van Wyhe, challenges the popular assumption that Darwin’s theory of evolution corresponded with a loss of religious belief....

[For] many Victorians the choice was not between God and science, religion or evolution, but between different notions of how God designed nature. It was already widely accepted that fixed natural laws (or secondary laws) had been discovered that explained natural phenomena from astronomy and chemistry to physiology and geology. Darwin, it was believed, had simply discovered a new law of nature designed by God.

- See more at: http://publicdomainreview.org/2011/0....H2wYSJ1R.dpuf

??????? really? I think you've just destroyed any argument you've ever had, or will, about anything with that statement. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

Lol. I didn't think you could tell the difference between reality vs. Metaphors, similes, and personifications.