Sometimes if feels like people never learn. These threads appear from time to time, and they never end well. Always turns out to be he said, she said. Usually the OP is a lady who comes out looking worse than she otherwise would have if she had just let the review fade into the past and didn't call attention to it. So many times I've read comments from guys that a single "No" review isn't a deal-breaker if she has a good record otherwise. Originally Posted by billw1032Couldn't have said it better. Just let it go. Causing more of a dramatic scene isn't good for business.
I have no dog in this fight...I read the original review and I can safely say the provider should be on BP and perm banned for ECCIE.
BUT.......
I believe that bowdown2me is telling the truth...
I think the provider knew she had her cycle (why she had a tampon in) was probably buying time to see if it would slow down or stop...or possibly she was drunk and that's why it took her hours to arrive. The client threatened a NCNS so she saw it in her best interest to show up to protect her reputation...or possibly she might have needed the money.
Not sure why she left her phone behind...if she was inebriated that is likely why...in her defense I've left my phone at the counter after paying my phone bill and was completely sober...I just had alot on my mind.
If it were me I would not have taken the entire 200. I would have asked to be reimbursed possibly for one way of the Uber fair....and this is why . ..
She should have told the client she had her cycle and let him decide if he wanted to continue with scheduling...he was spending his hard earned money...and no one would appreciate being deceived like that. Since it was his money he was spending it should have e been a choice to continue or not on his part.
I also can understand why she might have decided to show up since he threatened a NCNS...
In the end ..she should have stayed home and taken the NCNS gracefully...she might not be banned and if you work hard enough you can recover from a NCNS..I am living proof of that people...
It's unfortunate that this series of events turned out this way...
I think this should be a lesson that running a business without integrity has it's consequences. Originally Posted by Analeese
I have no dog in this fight...I read the original review and I can safely say the provider should be on BP and perm banned for ECCIE.
BUT.......
I believe that bowdown2me is telling the truth...
I think the provider knew she had her cycle (why she had a tampon in) was probably buying time to see if it would slow down or stop...or possibly she was drunk and that's why it took her hours to arrive. The client threatened a NCNS so she saw it in her best interest to show up to protect her reputation...or possibly she might have needed the money.
Not sure why she left her phone behind...if she was inebriated that is likely why...in her defense I've left my phone at the counter after paying my phone bill and was completely sober...I just had alot on my mind.
If it were me I would not have taken the entire 200. I would have asked to be reimbursed possibly for one way of the Uber fair....and this is why . ..
She should have told the client she had her cycle and let him decide if he wanted to continue with scheduling...he was spending his hard earned money...and no one would appreciate being deceived like that. Since it was his money he was spending it should have e been a choice to continue or not on his part.
I also can understand why she might have decided to show up since he threatened a NCNS...
In the end ..she should have stayed home and taken the NCNS gracefully...she might not be banned and if you work hard enough you can recover from a NCNS..I am living proof of that people...
It's unfortunate that this series of events turned out this way...
I think this should be a lesson that running a business without integrity has it's consequences. Originally Posted by Analeese
even if we accept her word that she wasn't sure she was bleeding.. what was the idea, to ask for DATY, and if he didn't finish with a red mouth, all was good to go? Originally Posted by Chung Tran
I'm surprised the bloody DATY has not been explored.. how fucked is that for her to ask right away for DATY? it's like being attacked with a deadly weapon.. Hell, I DATY all the time, and have never been asked to do so right away.. barely been asked, PERIOD (sorry for the metaphor), I just do it as normal sex play.Daty is something I really enjoy myself, and this is the first time I've ever had a provider immediately ask for it, matter of fact I think this is the first that has actually ever asked me for it at all..
even if we accept her word that she wasn't sure she was bleeding.. what was the idea, to ask for DATY, and if he didn't finish with a red mouth, all was good to go? Originally Posted by Chung Tran
I read the original review and I can safely say the provider should be on BP and perm banned for ECCIE.I knew this would end with her being banned, Did she even make it 24hrs after starting the thread?
Instead of the NCNS, she should of just told him what was up from the get go.
Instead:
1. She is banned from Eccie.
2. Her reputation on ECCIE is beyond shot.
3. We know she has a PIMP.
4. She is a danger to everyone.
5. Last, not that brilliant on how she manages her affairs. Originally Posted by scsholar