congressional slush fund? no one knew about this. Originally Posted by dilbert firestormYes, they did. You just didn't know.
IF its just for a mere accusation of fraud though, then its NOT 'with just cause'. Just like if a store terminates someone for a mere accusation of theft of company property. NO facts, no evidence, just someone's say, that is not a 'just cause' firing.. AND YES i have seen people who DID get fired that way and sued, THEN WON..Not sure how we got off on "fraud" or "theft" ... but the same applies .... an extreme example is not relevant to the general discussion of the current events .... contrary to what you are claiming there IS "EVIDENCE" of inappropriate sexual behavior.
The Monetary awards the women would/should win if they did sue for harassment and it was proven in a court of law..
But isn't there fact it is a 'secret slush fund' making it illegal..? AND IF they all signed NDA's, then those women now coming out about Conner and others, are in violation of the laws sinc they signed the contract (The NDA) to not speak about it.. Originally Posted by garhkal
I particularly like the opening disclaimer when they "pretty much are admitting" that the footage was stolen and used without permission.So what if the footage was stolen that doesn't make it false. Rappers are gay. The article below lists fifteen rappers that are gay. You're a real idiot if you think it stops here. Its common knowledge that Rap is primarily a gay music culture. If you're as accepting of gays as you claim to be you shouldn't have a problem with it.
Your point is?
Ahhh, you saw it on YOUTUBE!
Well then that makes it true! (Fucking lying RETARD!)
But Sandy Hook was staged? So was the moon landing, right?
HAHAAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAH! Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
So what if the footage was stolen that doesn't make it false. Rappers are gay. The article below lists fifteen rappers that are gay. You're a real idiot if you think it stops here. Its common knowledge that Rap is primarily a gay music culture. If you're as accepting of gays as you claim to be you shouldn't have a problem with it.that's a new one for me...
Jim
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry...b0c5a35c9d01eb Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisin
that's a new one for me...The lyrics downgrade women right? They call'em bitches and hoes. Men who love women really don't feel that way. Street thug gays would be misogynistic and they promote that to the straight men who listen to that junk. The music industry is full of homosexuality and promiscuity.
how can Rap music be gay music when it has lyrics that extol the virtues of mysogyny towards women. Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm
The lyrics downgrade women right? They call'em bitches and hoes. Men who love women really don't feel that way. Street thug gays would be misogynistic and they promote that to the straight men who listen to that junk. The music industry is full of homosexuality and promiscuity.looks like sissy chaps is very quiet about this. he's black & tranny right? lol!
Jim Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisin
The Great 0zombie Hope "CREEPY UNCLE JOE" @ https://www.youtube.com/user/PrisonPlanetLive/videosthe Republicans got their own Joe, right in our backyard..
Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB
Yes, they did. You just didn't know. Originally Posted by LexusLoverTHEY in congress knew of it. DID WE?? before now that is?
Not sure how we got off on "fraud" or "theft" ... but the same applies .... an extreme example is not relevant to the general discussion of the current events .... contrary to what you are claiming there IS "EVIDENCE" of inappropriate sexual behavior.In a COURT OF LAW, yes witness testimony counts as evidence. But it is NOT IN A COURT OF LAW is it LL?
The "evidence" would be the testimony of the "victims"! Originally Posted by LexusLover
A lot of people "settle" cases they "might win," because they also "might lose" the case, and a settlement avoids the risks and publicity. And in many instances the amount of the settlement is less than the attorney fees to defend the clam. Originally Posted by LexusLoverSO its like the guy who owns the corner shop paying the local gang 'protection money'.. They do it cause its the quick way out. NOT THAT THERE is actually anything to what's being claimed..
Oh! As for the "secret slush fund" ... it wasn't a "secret"! It was legislation passed during the Clinton Administration ... and funded in the budget requests. What is not disclosed are the names, dollar amounts paid out to the recipients, and for what claims. Originally Posted by LexusLoverFunny, i have NEVER heard of this so called slush fund before now... did you?