This doesn't make sense? The toiletries are free to take. They are worked into the cost of the room.
Towels now, maybe I can see.
However, none of these are of the same personal nature as one's own panties, nor does one have to sneak around in someone's personal belongings in a sneaky fashion to confiscate them!
Originally Posted by Victoria of Houston
The "personal" nature of one's panties compared to the "personal" nature of hotel toiletries with hotel's insignia are to an extent a comparison. It can't get any more "personal" outside of having a security tag than to have a hotel label.
The gentleman (not I) may feel that everything is worked into the cost of his session especially if he's paying for a top dollar escort. Not every guy can fully accept and grasp the notion that what they are paying for is 100% intangible. It's human nature to ask or desire something tangible after exchanging a considerable amount of cash (ie souvenirs, take-away gifts, complimentary gifts, etc..).
Let's compare - Again, I don't wholeheartedly feel this way but I can see how other men would. You've paid $600 for a session. You asked her to wear a $25 body stocking outfit in which you saw in an ad. What's $25 against a $600 session? A partial benefit of seeing a $400 and up escort is that they don't for the most part upcharge for outfit requests (at least most I know of). You can compare this to an expensive hotel in which one is lead by the notion that they're going to get as much out of it as possible.
Personally, the body stocking belongs to her. As an escort/business woman, etc. this is a reusable asset. For us, the consumer, we don't care about her use for it afterwards.
At the end of the day, it's rude and disrespectful to dig for a woman's undergarments