why are you guys dancing around this charge, trying to dispute it?
2 words you need to know: Merrick Garland.
and one phrase: tit-for-tat
Originally Posted by Chung Tran
So, there is moral equivalance in these two concepts:
Not voting on a SCOTUS nominee proferred by an outgoing president who filibustered a vote on a SCOTUS nominee while he was a senator.
AND
Attempting to destroy the character of a SCOTUS nominee for political purposes. Note the the movement that is doing this has done this before, repeatedly.
tit does not equal tat. Similar to the officer Wilson experience, these race-baiting, bigoted, fascist, hate-filled thugs will do whatever it takes to whomever is in their way to achieve their ultimate solution. Officer Wilson did exactly what he should have done, and his life was destroyed. Is this acceptable? Clearly, half the voters think so.
Does anyone find it odd that the personal lives of the accusers(the Senators and Congressfolk, not the victims) hasn't been vetted.
Does anyone find it odd that every person who chooses to associate themselves with the current executive branch in any way become a target of both official and unofficial investigations, slander and harassment. When they leave, it stops. The insidiousness of this is disgusting, and will destroy us.
After the election, George Soros was asked what he was going to do, politically. He said he was going to make this country ungovernable. Well, welcome to the end of the beginning.
P.S.
How is it that:
So long Jungle Monkey Man Kavanaugh
is acceptable speech here? Seriously