So Trish... Let's have some fun.

If she got banned for this, then the mod who banned her is a bigger fuckin' jackass than CC was for banning me. I'm looking at you, Dearhunter. And i'll be pointing it out every chance i get. Originally Posted by Doove

Go for it......the wheel awaits you.........ijs

So Doove I like ya but disagree. CC is not a jackass. Originally Posted by offshoredrilling

If i could share a PM with you that i received from a mod not named GP, you might not be so quick to disagree with me.

its dearhunter with a small "d".
can I ask what makes you think dh had anything to do with trisha getting banned.
Please do tell us

FIrst off, i clarified it with "if" this is the reason she got banned. That said, people throw out references all the time to ML topics that were discussed. People throw out references all the time to topics brought up in the ROS of reviews. And magically, nobody gets banned. And i think it's highly unlikely that anybody even gets so much as pointed. But reference a topic that was discussed in the SH, and almost inevitably, a small number of dipshits get their panties in a bunch over it.

And the best (or worst, depending on how you look at it) part is, you don't even need PA to get into the Spider Hole. All ya gotta do is ask.

So again, if this is the reason she got banned, then it says more about the dickless, self aggrandizing mod who banned her than it says about her.

If i could share a PM with you that i received from a mod not named GP, you might not be so quick to disagree with me. Originally Posted by Doove

maybe maybe not. Depends on the topic. If the topic is the eccie guide lines, I would bet not.
Remember when the hammer fell on few guide lines here in Upset NY. Was it not I that got wind of it coming and posted a warning before that hammer hit.

FIrst off, i clarified it with "if" this is the reason she got banned. That said, people throw out references all the time to ML topics that were discussed. People throw out references all the time to topics brought up in the ROS of reviews. And magically, nobody gets banned. And i think it's highly unlikely that anybody even gets so much as pointed. But reference a topic that was discussed in the SH, and almost inevitably, a small number of dipshits get their panties in a bunch over it.

And the best (or worst, depending on how you look at it) part is, you don't even need PA to get into the Spider Hole. All ya gotta do is ask.

So again, if this is the reason she got banned, then it says more about the dickless, self aggrandizing mod who banned her than it says about her. Originally Posted by Doove

ok IF (Clinton should have ask definition of if as he did is also LOL)
Gals in Upset NY have been banned for posting ROS or ML before. No mod or admin should tell WHY. So unless she told someone why, we do not know why. And a smart person if she told them would not tell all why in the open.

No one should say shit about what is in any area of the board that is not open to all that they may be in, in the open. If you learn about something of another area you are not to know, its wise to say nothing at all about it. Example: Once when fixing a PC by ops I saw a Powder room title. I reported myself to mods, and joked about it in the open. If I posted that title would I not have been banned. For sure I would have. And bet mods watching for a time if anyone other posted and again I would have been banned.

not topic but, do you remember that who wrote that eccie ad game. I should have been banned, ahem her also maqybe. But I did tell a mod how it was done after first add I wrote. And I pointed at the very guide line why I should have been banned. I was not banned pointed or given a infraction warning. But latter ad's I wrote where sent by email or pm rather than the how done the first time. I will say mod dealing with me at the time did not seem to understand the guide lines I broke. I change how to be safe on my own.

If trisha gave up how she knew something she should have not if that is why she banned, then who is the other handle that is banned? note post by cb pointing at me LOL link #24

I see your argument as one that is stating if someone learns about a area of the board that he/she should not know about, and posts it in the open. Mods and admins should not take action. Sorry I see that as bull fill in the blank . They should ban that person or make a offer tell who leaked and ban that person. No matter what area of the board that is not open to all. oh and that link #24, the leak if there was one should turn self in. It was not I, and I bet will not happen. But that post is stating I should take the hit for her. Sorry I will not. You can if you want.

oh and any one can buy a private area of a board also. They can let in who they want. I was in once that a hooktard had. its gone now. But I can't say in the open anything that was in it. No PA or VP was needed. I asked, she let me in.

maybe maybe not. Depends on the topic. If the topic is the eccie guide lines, I would bet not. Originally Posted by offshoredrilling

You really do need to get your nose out of CC's butthole.

Gals in Upset NY have been banned for posting ROS or ML before.

Funny, but in my last review, a non-PA member made a comment clearly indicating that he saw the ROS info. So either he has another handle (heh), or someone fed him ROS info and should have gotten banned.....or he should be banned for not cooperating by identifying the person who fed him the ROS info. Wanna make any wagers on what happened?

No mod or admin should tell WHY. So unless she told someone why, we do not know why. And a smart person if she told them would not tell all why in the open.

Fair enough, so we don't know for sure. But if you wanna carry this conversation further, rest assured, i've got 6 posts lined up from the last 3 or 4 months alone where someone commented that "such and such was discussed in the ML", and i don't recall any of those members having been banned.

And how many times have we had someone without PA ask a question in a review thread only to be told "that was answered in the ROS. Get some."? Simply pointing out that a particular topic was mentioned in the ML, or ROS, or the SH or anywhere else, without getting into any detail of what was actually said regarding that topic is harmless. But then, i've come to learn that being harmless around here is a worse offense than accusing someone of using. Or having an STD.

Here ya go: I know for a fact that people have posted about me in the SH. And SAB. And in the SH they talk about providers in general. And post pictures. And say "hooktard" a lot.

Go ahead, ban me for pointing all that out.

This place is absurd.

And by the way, pointing out that a topic was talked about in the SH, just how much different is that than starting a new thread to quote someone pointing out that a topic was talked about in the SH?

Seems to me like Clownstar simply started a thread to repeat what he heard Trish say.

As they say, on we go...

You really do need to get your nose out of CC's butthole.
its not, we had are disagreements CC and I. Sorry can't post prof


Funny, but in my last review, a non-PA member made a comment clearly indicating that he saw the ROS info. So either he has another handle (heh), or someone fed him ROS info and should have gotten banned.....or he should be banned for not cooperating by identifying the person who fed him the ROS info. Wanna make any wagers on what happened?
hope not going by title
shhhhh my title will auto change to ahem my title on 03-23-2015
mod jack taint around to blow me in on that in the open

Fair enough, so we don't know for sure. But if you wanna carry this conversation further, rest assured, i've got 6 posts lined up from the last 3 or 4 months alone where someone commented that "such and such was discussed in the ML", and i don't recall any of those members having been banned.

And how many times have we had someone without PA ask a question in a review thread only to be told "that was answered in the ROS. Get some."? Simply pointing out that a particular topic was mentioned in the ML, or ROS, or the SH or anywhere else, without getting into any detail of what was actually said regarding that topic is harmless. But then, i've come to learn that being harmless around here is a worse offense than accusing someone of using. Or having an STD. warnings should be handed out, then points

Here ya go: I know for a fact that people have posted about me in the SH. And SAB. And in the SH they talk about providers in general. And post pictures. And say "hooktard" a lot.
I would have no idea. but please tell us more (LOL "start anywhere....)
Go ahead, ban me for pointing all that out.
I'm not a mod
This place is absurd.
well it is a SHMB just sayin Originally Posted by Doove

eh

hope not going by title

Nope. Go back and read the thread.

I didn't even catch it myself until he posted that he can't read the ROS.

that fucking OSD jackass hinted he could not read ROS
But did he give up some ROS in his posts

Is doove asking for my modtard services in upset NY?

Is doove asking for my modtard services in upset NY? Originally Posted by dearhunter

if you help him, will he like you then?????

If i could share a PM with you that i received from a mod not named GP, you might not be so quick to disagree with me.



FIrst off, i clarified it with "if" this is the reason she got banned. That said, people throw out references all the time to ML topics that were discussed. People throw out references all the time to topics brought up in the ROS of reviews. And magically, nobody gets banned. And i think it's highly unlikely that anybody even gets so much as pointed. But reference a topic that was discussed in the SH, and almost inevitably, a small number of dipshits get their panties in a bunch over it.

And the best (or worst, depending on how you look at it) part is, you don't even need PA to get into the Spider Hole. All ya gotta do is ask.

So again, if this is the reason she got banned, then it says more about the dickless, self aggrandizing mod who banned her than it says about her. Originally Posted by Doove

And hope your bad enough that someone likes you to allow you into this super private section

And by the way, pointing out that a topic was talked about in the SH, just how much different is that than starting a new thread to quote someone pointing out that a topic was talked about in the SH?

Seems to me like Clownstar simply started a thread to repeat what he heard Trish say.

As they say, on we go... Originally Posted by Doove

he Paulie girl wanted to go after it more.
Thread/threAD was closed
tadah by magic this thread

sorry I missed this at first
and
^^^^^^^^^ open threads to all ^^^^^^^
The area your talking about I would think is not open to all
just like that area a now gone hooker paid for that I was in
she left the board, no one paid, now its gone
and I even still can't post in the open what was in it

but if you want, please tell us more about that area your talking about "start anywhere..."

FWIW, OSD had nothing to do with the ban.

FWIW, OSD had nothing to do with the ban. Originally Posted by blthzr666

FWIW - Wiktionary

FWIW. For what it's worth. For whoever is wondering. From what I've witnessed. Forgot where I was. Retrieved from ...

ya I "forgot where I was", so how could I
or
let them think what I could not have done, its more fun
speaking of fun, Doove this fun time to pull a fake ban.ya know. go for it

b666,
if I or someone hands you a SHMB self hanging rope. Post with care

Point taken OSD.