Bonn11 review

Lots of negative comments from gents that don't have a clue or don't even know me.

Judgmental crowd for certain.

Hey look no use crying over spilt milk. Can't we all just put his behind us. :P

You're right! Some gents just can't handle their MILK.

Hell they write some of them LMFAO! Originally Posted by Still Looking

I've always wanted a Provider to write a review about me.

One has volunteered to.

But no lactose play.

Is there now a "milk pipe" to be had somewhere?

awww you bastards fucking banned her.

What a shame a real shame!!

What a shame a real shame!! Originally Posted by bonn11

Quick! Call the printers and put a Hold on those "I'm Good For Your Business!" banners!

This is correct.

Her posting anything she read in that ROS, however, is still a violation of the guidelines. That is the risk the hobbyist runs in sharing his ROS with a provider. She revealed, in an open forum, that she knows ROS info. Now she gets banned.

What's funny is that normally, the moderators would question the OP about who gave her ROS info, and that person would share her ban...since the board has ruled that the guidelines don't prohibit the review writer from sharing his ROS info, she gets the full ban...

You all can spread blame around to make up for it though... Originally Posted by Wakeup

Point of order... if a hobbyist writes a review and PM'S. emails or reads it to the provider "BEFORE" it is published as I understand it that's NOT against the rules. Once its published then its off limits. If that's a true statement then providers in deed could have knowledge of ROS.

In the case of Tracy Aime she had ROS because hell she wrote the review(s). Can't fault her for that. But there was that little issue about securing a hobbyist handle LOL

I've always wanted a Provider to write a review about me.

One has volunteered to.

But no lactose play. Originally Posted by Precious_b

Lactose intolerant?

Point of order... if a hobbyist writes a review and PM'S. emails or reads it to the provider "BEFORE" it is published as I understand it that's NOT against the rules. Once its published then its off limits. If that's a true statement then providers in deed could have knowledge of ROS. Originally Posted by Still Looking

You don't read so well...

As I said...yes...they can have access to ROS through a hobbyist giving them the review...and that's not a violation...

As I also said...if she admits on the board that she saw the ROS, or mentions that ROS on the board, she's in violation of the guideline, and gets banned...as you can see happened to the OP...

awww you bastards fucking banned her. Originally Posted by savak

Self inflicted




redundant

Lactose intolerant? Originally Posted by Still Looking

No. Just no lactose play.

Had to put that in there so it would be reverent to the topic of the posting

Purrrsia will be back in a week.

She already has gents lining up for their milk treatment(s). LOL

Sorry she got banned. guess that hurt her business huh?