Firstly Wackey stick to what I actually said. I agree that police kill more than blacks. What I actually said is disproportionately blacks. I also said police shouldn’t be killing people for resisting arrest. You didn’t address any example I gave that could have not resulted in the death of the person. Instead you found some crazy example that you think buttresses your argument but it actually doesn’t. Use of deadly force shouldn’t occur when there’s multiple cops and one individual who is unarmed. Nevertheless it does. And like I said, in the civilized countries, police don’t have anything close to the number of police involved shootings or killings. Even less when the person is unarmed.
Reallocating funds from police departments don’t eliminate them just like cutting funds to any other department. Saying it just won’t make it true. Militarized police departments and police funding is a very recent phenomenon. Rethinking staffing, cutting desk jobs, having police live where they work, recruiting better cops, requiring more education, all could go long ways in creating better police forces. Reallocating resources would likely result in police forces being more efficient. It’s a false narrative to claim less money means they’ll be gone altogether. Originally Posted by 1blackman1
if blacks stopped being disproportionately criminal maybe this wouldn't happen as much, yeah?
13/90 is false. you know this stat don't ya? it's the crime stats for blacks. but it's wrong. it's really 6/57.
which makes it worse. 6 percent of the population commits 57 percent of crimes.
who is that 6 percent? the percent of black males in the population.
so why is that? evil whitey? or just thug life which is glorified by rap crap music. and other areas of black culture?
cops shouldn't have to kill suspects. but the use of deadly force is necessary when suspects will not submit to the rule of law.
more efficient? or useless?
so what do you think of little Devon being gunned down by evil white cops? did you watch?
it's for your own good.
