Fox News - We knew it all along...

Fox does have the best looking women of all the networks that is for sure. Originally Posted by Wyldeman30

You appear to be making the claim that Greta is better looking than Rachel, or something to that effect. Even if true, I fail to understand the relevance.

Perhaps he's trying to point out a possible reason for Fox's higher ratings.

But if he is, then we need HARD COCKUMENTATION on that!

Frankly, Rachel is pretty hot, imho. AND fluent in English!

You appear to be making the claim that Greta is better looking than Rachel, or something to that effect. Even if true, I fail to understand the relevance. Originally Posted by bigtex

You would point out the single one that is not hot. I guess you must be into the old and aged look.

Fox does have the best looking women of all the networks that is for sure. Originally Posted by Wyldeman30

If you cant dazzle them with brilliance you baffle them with eye candy.

You would point out the single one that is not hot. I guess you must be into the old and aged look. Originally Posted by Wyldeman30

You appear to be making the claim that Greta is better looking than Rachel, or something to that effect. Even if true, I fail to understand the relevance. Originally Posted by bigtex

Wydleman30---Apparently you were not paying very close attention. It was quite evident that the relevant statement in that particular post was:

"Even if true, I fail to understand the relevance."

Ok, I will play along. Shall we break it down to the least common denominator?

1. Why is it relevant if Fox to has better looking woman than all of the networks?
2. Does having better looking women than all of the networks help Fox do a more professional job in covering the news?

I anxiously await your response!

Waiting.....

Waiting......

Are you pacing the floor????

Are you pacing the floor???? Originally Posted by Wyldeman30

No, but I slept quite well!

I suppose I should lob easier questions your way next time.

No, but I slept quite well!

I suppose I should lob easier questions your way next time. Originally Posted by bigtex

Just did not feel like answering a stupid question. My bad.

You should never feel bad about asking or answering a stupid question the first time. It's the 24/7 pursuit of that endeavor which distinguishes Fox News from the villainous mainstream media.

Jon Stewart had a hysterical piece on Sarah Palin last night. Interview in which she proclaimed "she owed the mainstream media nothing."

When Fox first got started it used to be called "the wet lipstick network."

I'm not opposed to having sexy women reading the news, but they should at least not be so tacky and ridiculous in the way they're presented.

The total bubble-brained Robin Mead at CNN is an example of a tastfully dressed, non-tawdry looking sexy woman who is a complete air-head but looks interesting nontheless.

ps....

In the Czech republic [and I think still in Hungary] female weather reporters on television are topless.

When Fox goes that route I wont complain about their tawdry make-up.

When Fox first got started it used to be called "the wet lipstick network."

I'm not opposed to having sexy women reading the news, but they should at least not be so tacky and ridiculous in the way they're presented.

The total bubble-brained Robin Mead at CNN is an example of a tastfully dressed, non-tawdry looking sexy woman who is a complete air-head but looks interesting nontheless.

ps....

In the Czech republic [and I think still in Hungary] female weather reporters on television are topless.

When Fox goes that route I wont complain about their tawdry make-up. Originally Posted by theaustinescorts

I was in Prague a while back and saw a topless weather report. I also saw a topless game show hostess. Who gave a fuck that I didn't understand what she was saying? Nice yabbos!

Truth and integrity be damned, bring on the TITS! They shall be as HEADLIGHTS among the nation!

Just did not feel like answering a stupid question. My bad. Originally Posted by Wyldeman30

Hmmmm! Given the fact that it was such a simple question that would not require much thought, I am left to wonder whether the above response was a convenient way of saying you didn't have anything intelligent to add!

Just sayin'

Just did not care bigT....

Thanks for playing...

Next

Just did not care bigT.... Originally Posted by Wyldeman30

That dog don't hunt! I seem to recall that you were the first to mention that Fox had the best looking women. It would seem to me that if you did not care, you would not have brought the subject up to begin with. Now would you?

I merely asked why is it relevant? I am inclined to believe it is not relevant? You seemed to believe that it was. However you now seem rather reluctant to commit. The easiest way you could find a way out was to say mine was a stupid question! That being the case, would you not also say that your original statement was pretty damn stupid?

Just sayin'

Let me guess, you are not an experienced debater, are you?

That dog don't hunt! I seem to recall that you were the first to mention that Fox had the best looking women. It would seem to me that if you did not care, you would not have brought the subject up to begin with. Now would you?

Just a observation.

I merely asked why is it relevant? I say it is not relevant? You seem to say that it is but not that you have to commit, you are apparently having second thoughts about backing up your original statement!

Seriously!
Let me guess, you are not an experienced debater, are you? Originally Posted by bigtex

What do I win Johnny?

Hercules Hercules Hercules