No offense but all your pics show is that someone had some tests run and that they are posted in ascending order of testosterone value. For all we know that's 3 different people's results. Or maybe the last one posted (with 971 total T) was the first sample taken like 15 years ago and the first one posted (with 81 total T) was the most recent.
Or, maybe the person whose test results you depict is also injecting Testosterone, or has some medical condition for which they are receiving treatment which has the ancillary effect of raising T.
Hell I could show you pics of my last 3 cholesterol tests and claim that it went down because I've been getting regular blowjobs. Turns out I've also been working out, eating clean, and have lost 30 lbs.
This is why anecdotal "evidence" is worthless, its both a small sample size and uncontrolled.
Please cite some large randomized placebo controlled studies proving your claims. DHEA has been around a long time and has been well studied. Here's an example from the New England Journal of Medicine which was a 2 year placebo controlled randomized study the results of which directly contradict your claims.
Nair KS, Rizza RA, O'Brien P, et al. DHEA in elderly women and DHEA or testosterone in elderly men. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:1647-59.
Forgive my skepticism, you see I'm a critical thinker by nature. So I'm naturally suspicious when I see two guys going back and forth with each other in multiple threads about supplements with dubious scientific basis. Especially when they both appear to be shills for the supplement company whose products are the only ones they discuss.
A fool and his money are soon parted, I'm sure your not so subtle sales pitch will work on some desperate dullards out there.
I look forward to your upcoming meta-analysis of the scientific literature. I won't hold my breath.