Think before you Ink

Once you get a Bunch of Tattoos all over your body you can never look soft and like a real Classy pretty Girl you will always be considered Rough neck/ thug/ hood type chic ... Something to think about

Attachment 320408

Attachment 320408 Originally Posted by MissMiracle
Oh, look. It's a lady who makes her own decisions judging another lady who makes her own decisions. On a hooker board at that!
(Incase you care, I don't think judging other ladies is very lady or soft like).
politebluefish's Avatar
I agree with Miss Miracle to a large extent, but in the end it's all about personal preferences. I have my right to my personal preferences as much as the provider who chooses to cover herself in tats. And neither of us have the right to force another to do/think/act contrary to their own beliefs.
I have seen some very beautiful and sexy providers with their share of tattoos. That being said, with all other things being equal, i.e., two providers are equally beautiful and both with good personalities and skills, I would probably opt for the one without all the extra ink.
"The difference between tattooed people and non-tattooed people is that tattooed people don't care whether someone else has tattoos or not". Or something like that. Honestly, I will never understand why tattoo-haters are so obsessed with how others choose to decorate their bodies. If you don't like tattoos- don't get any! If I regret my ink when I'm an elder (which I really can't see why I would)- not your problem! And if my great-nieces and -nephews ask me about my ink, I'll welcome the chance to interact with them and share some stories of my past... and I'm sure they'll enjoy it too.
Sickpuppy's Avatar
My new ATF: http://www.bizarremag.com/tattoos-an...ed_granny.html Originally Posted by Sickpuppy
This shit just writes itself.....your one SICK PUPPY!!. Lol


...Good to see you have a sense of humor though.
My new ATF: http://www.bizarremag.com/tattoos-an...ed_granny.html Originally Posted by Sickpuppy
Beautiful! I can only hope to attain that level of DGAF-itude by the time I'm 70!
OMG I CANT STOP LAUGHING EWWWHHH!


I would never get a tattoo like this: There is such a thing as tasteful tattoos and this definitely isn't one of them. Originally Posted by XoticSynn
It all depends on the quality of the tattoo & location its in! I personally am not a fan of a woman with tons of tattoos. A few well done tats are ok. I myself love the way I look with clothes off and on with no tattoos.
Here is the most true statement you will read in this entire thread: People with tattoos really don't give a fuck what anyone else's opinions of them are.

Carry on...
Fast Gunn's Avatar
Well, that pedestrian observation may be true, but that hardly changes the reality.

People who commit offenses against society or themselves do not care about the opinions of the world either, but that does not mitigate the crime.

. . . Carving out the body with ink or knife is still mutilation of the body regardless of how you rationalize the practice. Some fundamentals of life which are obvious to some are totally obscured from others, but eventually the truth becomes known. It took China 3 centuries (that's right, centuries to even see the obvious) to realize that binding their feet was an abomination and maybe it will take that long for others to realize how ink and metal desecrates the natural beauty of the human form.




Here is the most true statement you will read in this entire thread: People with tattoos really don't give a fuck what anyone else's opinions of them are.

Carry on... Originally Posted by Charlie Angel
offshoredrilling's Avatar
You know what's so unsexy? Unsolicited opinions about others. I don't care if it's, "I hate tattoos." "Blondes are hotter." "Who would pay for a Bbw?"
All of those unsolicited opinions make someone sound like a bitter a-hole.

"But it's just my opinion... "
Yeah, quit crying. No one wants your negativity. I would take someone with no reviews over someone who tries to tell me their way in life is the one I should follow.

Next. Originally Posted by Alyssa Marie
Old-T's Avatar
  • Old-T
  • 06-14-2014, 05:42 PM
. . . Carving out the body with ink or knife is still mutilation of the body regardless of how you rationalize the practice. Some fundamentals of life which are obvious to some are totally obscured from others, but eventually the truth becomes known. It took China 3 centuries (that's right, centuries to even see the obvious) to realize that binding their feet was an abomination and maybe it will take that long for others to realize how ink and metal desecrates the natural beauty of the human form.

Originally Posted by Fast Gunn
I am still interested in your thoughts on:

Are you equally as adamantly opposed to any desecration via died hair, jewelry, or make-up? Put aside the artist aspect, philosophically they are the same. Originally Posted by Old-T
By the way, involuntarily binding feet--thus producing significant harm to the women for the rest of their lives--seems a bit different from ear piercing, for example. I have never known a lady to suffer long term damage from being able to wear a nice pair of diamond studs.
Well, that pedestrian observation may be true, but that hardly changes the reality.

People who commit offenses against society or themselves do not care about the opinions of the world either, but that does not mitigate the crime.

. . . Carving out the body with ink or knife is still mutilation of the body regardless of how you rationalize the practice. Some fundamentals of life which are obvious to some are totally obscured from others, but eventually the truth becomes known. It took China 3 centuries (that's right, centuries to even see the obvious) to realize that binding their feet was an abomination and maybe it will take that long for others to realize how ink and metal desecrates the natural beauty of the human form.


Originally Posted by Fast Gunn
Hmm, sounds like someone's paraphrasing from the bible..(hate to say it but sounds like my conservative, religious mother!) ..sounds a bit hypocritical to me. You're on a hooker board. Really?

As several people said, those with tattoo's do not care what others think. Do you know why? They didn't get them for anyone else. They got them for themselves. At least that's the way I see it.

Maybe some people think that the hobby is all the providers have and will do whatever the gents want or try to keep their bodies "pristine"......but in reality, we all have lives. We all have our own opinions. So do you. If you don't like tattoos or piercings, or whatever you're hypocritical about, then don't see them. But you should not judge them.

Seeing as how you are bible-quoting you should know that only god can judge. Not YOU. Tattoo's are not mutilations. Cutting off parts of your body, branding (maybe) that's still in the eye of the beholder, etc. maybe, maybe then you can cast stones, but for most people tattoo's represent a person's life, their achievements, their loved ones, their trials, their lessons, etc. Who are you to judge?? You pay by the HOUR, not by their lives.
Guido2010's Avatar
...

That being said, with all other things being equal, i.e., two providers are equally beautiful and both with good personalities and skills, I would probably opt for the one without all the extra ink. Originally Posted by politebluefish
That is what is so good about choice. I would go the other way, and I have when asked who I wanted in a group environment. I have no ink, but prefer women who do.

I consider the statement "Tattoos are not distracting." as a, I like ink on a woman, but if you don't then no worries the experience is worth it with her even if you are anti-ink.
Gotyour6's Avatar
I look for women with ink.

I have paid a shit ton to have girls I date get them.

One girl I was in a three year long relationship with got a heart on her pelvic bone area that had Sugar baby in script so she could remember our experience.