Wow! I've been called everything under the sun by other members never saw one person punished for it. I've been dragged thur the mud and maybe one or two people said a word. But say one thing about a provider bad, your banned.
This is a hooker board plain and simple.
Originally Posted by Raw dog
Anything you deserve is not anyone's fault but yours but since you seem to love Raw Dogging you are what you are. To me you simply represent the negative of our chosen hobby. Do you realize that you could contract a whatever you call it that in some cases is incurable AND most often does not manifest itself for weeks on end.
Before I book with a provider, I check you and one other hobbyist to see if you have written a review on her recently. How does that make you feel dude? I am not the only one either. This makes the case for what this disagreement on this thread is all about. You not only don't care about your own well being but feel fairly open to contaminate everything your desire commands in the process. I however do acknowledge the lack of provider input in this topic, but hey business is business I guess - makes me cry .
This is not a hooker board. It is a social media opportunity for providers and hobbyists to interact. There is a certain trust through this over time that the interaction that is developed that enables two people to think that they can have an intimate relationship albeit for an hour or so and not have any ill effects.
That in and of itself is the core of the argument. Owner has decided that this is what he thinks will bring home the bacon and I respectfully disagree and I am a 60 year old successful businessman. I would take the total opposite approach. I would uphold the utmost standards and have the mods, etc. check out complaints of verified people regarding health issues and other negative traits to determine if they should still be verified. Obviously they, the mods, deal with repercussions on a daily basis either way but I really wonder if the shift to protect both providers and hobbyists from those that make poor decisions would actually grow the media outreach. I think it would motivate those individuals involved on the negative end to rise up and become TRUSTWORTHY. I also believe by word of mouth and other means that people would be more willing to join instead of paying their money and reading this diatribe.
The last point I want to make is this. If the owner of this media enterprise thinks that not allowing any talk of what they don't like will absolve them of criminal or even civil prosecution, you have to get yourself a new attorney. You fuck up the right individual and have the attitude of recklessness using the word "verified" when they are not even really significantly screened on a regular basis, you are asking for trouble. There is still a capitalistic principle in this country that suggests "you get what you pay for". Karma is a real bitch, trust me on this.
I will post the last trip report to Tijuana (which is not to be missed), if the mods will let me, and afterward I will drift off to the land of no reviews P411 and do my business from there. I don't trust this site much more than BP as far as making sure the hobbyist (me) doesn't get burned. I have way to fucking much at risk. Betcha Pornodave doesn't.
if you agree and got some balls give me a +1. even you Raw Dog.