Ex Obama advisors say that Iran deal is a scam and Obama is being played

If you think I work at a fucking glory hole, you're cum drunk Originally Posted by WombRaider

You would be the cum drunk glory hole master woomby !

The deal was agreed to by Kerry, the Iranian negotiators and some others about 2 weeks late. Supposedly the UN Security Council have to approve it, after that some other international bodies.

Doesn't appear its going to pass Congress. The US citizens Iran is holding hostage will still be held. Obama's press conference switched focus to Bill Cosby. Obama berated some reporter for not letting him take a victory lap unchallenged.

Major Garrett, former Faux News turdlicker. Big surprise.

Major Garrett, former Faux News turdlicker. Big surprise. Originally Posted by WombRaider

Your hatred and stupidity are so obvious that it hurts to see it. Garrett works for CBS douche and not Fox. So, if you want to be consistent then you have to start referring to Bill O'Reilly as a the former CBS reporter, Greta as the former CNN reporter, Juan as the former NPR analyst, Geraldo as the former ABC reporter, and so on. You're in the running for Dipshit of the Year right now.

On the outside chance you're sincere....maybe you're just surprised that it was a "former Fox" reporter who spoke truth to power while the rest of them were licking Obama's hobnail boots.

Your hatred and stupidity are so obvious that it hurts to see it. Garrett works for CBS douche and not Fox. So, if you want to be consistent then you have to start referring to Bill O'Reilly as a the former CBS reporter, Greta as the former CNN reporter, Juan as the former NPR analyst, Geraldo as the former ABC reporter, and so on. You're in the running for Dipshit of the Year right now.

On the outside chance you're sincere....maybe you're just surprised that it was a "former Fox" reporter who spoke truth to power while the rest of them were licking Obama's hobnail boots. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

That's why I said 'former'. Consistent? You don't get to make up the rules on consistency, shitass. Nobody was licking his boots. I doubt you even watched the entire press conference. He received plenty of probing questions. Speaking truth to power

Yeah, keep singing that song, dipshit. Your inability to reason has been on full display for quite some time. You don't understand anything and are constantly asking why someone did something, like a retard.


Where's that 777 BTW? You sure you looked under every shrub?

Here is the bottom line; our American hostages are still in an Iranian prison, Iran is going to get their nuke, and they are getting their trade sanctions lifted. Anything else you think they got?

Here is the bottom line; our American hostages are still in an Iranian prison, Iran is going to get their nuke, and they are getting their trade sanctions lifted. Anything else you think they got? Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

Do you WANT those things to happen? It almost sounds like you WANT them to happen. If Iran is as manipulative and dishonest as you say, then what negotiations by ANYONE would have worked EVER? Hmmm?

I think you got shit for brains, but then that's not news.

Do you WANT those things to happen? It almost sounds like you WANT them to happen. If Iran is as manipulative and dishonest as you say, then what negotiations by ANYONE would have worked EVER? Hmmm?

I think you got shit for brains, but then that's not news. Originally Posted by WombRaider

You're an ignorant slut, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas. Only fucked-in-the-head lib-retards like you and Odumbo believe that the U.S. had to "negotiate" for a fuckin' thing since coercive sanctions were working just fine, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas: coercive sanctions are what forced them to the negotiation table.

It was a fair question. Obama's answer was inadequate. He's taking a victory lap for negotiating an agreement that gives Iran whatever they want. And they get to keep the hostages as insurance that we don't try back out. Smartest President ever? Bullshit.

Re. the Major Garrett question:

Could somebody please translate this "explanation" of why Odumbo didn't even try to get those 4 Americans out who are (by his own admission) "languishing in Iranian jails"?


"Now, if the question is why we did not tie the negotiations to their release, think about the logic that that creates. Suddenly, Iran realizes you know what? Maybe we can get additional concessions out of the Americans by holding these individuals. Makes it much more difficult for us to walk away if Iran somehow thinks that a nuclear deal is dependent in some fashion on the nuclear."


Per his suggestion, I've been thinking about it - try as I may, I can't find any logic in NOT demanding their release or at least raising the issue. Does this guy look for reasons NOT to negotiate in our best interests?

.

LMAO wondered how many of you have read the so called agreement.

LMAO wondered how many of you have read the so called agreement. Originally Posted by i'va biggen

You must have read it, little eva, since you refer to it as a "so-called" agreement. Why don't you enlighten us by explaining the basis of your skepticism?

It was a fair question. Obama's answer was inadequate. He's taking a victory lap for negotiating an agreement that gives Iran whatever they want. And they get to keep the hostages as insurance that we don't try back out. Smartest President ever? Bullshit. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Trump had a good point in that Obama should have insisted that all four hostages were released before negotiations began.

All this deal does is guarantee Iran doesn't have a nuke in hand before Obama's term ends.

LMAO wondered how many of you have read the so called agreement. Originally Posted by i'va biggen

Please link to it and explain it to us, LittleEva.

It was a fair question. Obama's answer was inadequate. He's taking a victory lap for negotiating an agreement that gives Iran whatever they want. And they get to keep the hostages as insurance that we don't try back out. Smartest President ever? Bullshit. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

It wasn't a fair question. It was a disingenuous question. Of course he's not happy that there are still hostages there. And then you go on to outright lie. It doesn't give Iran whatever they want. Their facilities will be under 24/7 surveillance. If they're so sneaky and dishonest that they're willing to subvert any deal and attempt to create a new facility, then how would anyone have had success negotiating with them? Should we not try, though? You're speaking out of fear and ignorance. You try and present this different front. A more libertarian front, but you're just the same as everyone else. The only difference is you're too much of a fucking chickenshit to admit it.