Spam???

Dkayz's Avatar
  • Dkayz
  • 04-10-2016, 10:44 AM
I don't know how the moderation guidelines work, but I know that you guys can make "sub-rules" for your respected forums. Kind of like you did with the naming of where the location is in reviews.

Maybe we need one on max amount of threads you can start per day, because when I come here looking for information, I don't want to scroll through 3 pages of bullshit from Still Looking that most people don't want to read.

Sure, some of the threads are actually good conversation topics, but we don't need to have 300 of them within a 2 hour period.

If the mods wanna get really picky, SL is technically harassing several mods by doing something he knows is annoying to 97% of the people here just because it isn't a written rule. It could be taken as disrespect to others in general, which is rule #3.

I hate people that get so fucking picky about specifics in rules. "Well, there wasn't anything written that said I had to take a shit in the toilet and not next to it, so it must be ok." SL knows it's common sense that he's spamming, and he's just doing it to piss people off.

Edit: And Whispers, too, since apparently he thought it was important to reply to 30 reviews today.
Whispers's Avatar
I don't know how the moderation guidelines work, but I know that you guys can make "sub-rules" for your respected forums. Kind of like you did with the naming of where the location is in reviews.

Maybe we need one on max amount of threads you can start per day, because when I come here looking for information, I don't want to scroll through 3 pages of bullshit from Still Looking that most people don't want to read.

Sure, some of the threads are actually good conversation topics, but we don't need to have 300 of them within a 2 hour period.

If the mods wanna get really picky, SL is technically harassing several mods by doing something he knows is annoying to 97% of the people here just because it isn't a written rule. It could be taken as disrespect to others in general, which is rule #3.

I hate people that get so fucking picky about specifics in rules. "Well, there wasn't anything written that said I had to take a shit in the toilet and not next to it, so it must be ok." SL knows it's common sense that he's spamming, and he's just doing it to piss people off.

Edit: And Whispers, too, since apparently he thought it was important to reply to 30 reviews today. Originally Posted by Dkayz
I just started reading reviews in the KC Metro area looking for options on an upcoming visit...... as I do I tend comment on them about things that I find ......It's polite to reply to someone's review some guys quit reviewing in the absence of their reviews being noticed..... I have to run do some work but I'll get back to working my way through the reviews when I return....

Although what some members share may be annoying to you some of us tend to have a couple of followers...... http://eccie.net/forumdisplay.php?f=...esc&sort=views So long as people read the threads I start I know there are those that appreciate my contributions.

SL has a huge fan club as well.....

Your problem lies with your MODs... Not SL....

Lets go back to this comment.....

I hate people that get so fucking picky about specifics in rules. "Well, there wasn't anything written that said I had to take a shit in the toilet and not next to it, so it must be ok." SL knows it's common sense that he's spamming, and he's just doing it to piss people off. Originally Posted by Dkayz
You could apply that analogy to how a MOD enforces a rule singling out a member as well....
ScubaBad's Avatar
Please ban this fucktard from our boards or at least give him a loooong vacation.

SL - you are annoying and fucking pathetic.
JohnnyYanks's Avatar
Please ban this fucktard from our boards or at least give him a loooong vacation.

SL- you are annoying and fucking pathetic. Originally Posted by ScubaBad
I had heard the forums in the Midwest were genteel. Imagine my surprise to find such blatant unprovoked rudeness.

I wonder how tightly they moderate such behavior?

As to the OP's questions: I believe unlimited threads are allowed. Or even threADs, should you be inclined to return TS SL to action.

I haven't heard anything definitive on spam. Have you?
algrace's Avatar
The vendetta SL may or may not have has certainly resulted in the first couple pages of KC coed forum. It is his choice to start so many damn threads, but it sure the hell is annoying, as well as the behavior of commenting on several of his original post whether or not he has had a response.

KC has already had its share of members prove that following guidelines and making an ass of oneself are not mutually exclusive.
Still Looking's Avatar
Seems like NOBODY use the word "PLEASE" around here.

algrace's Avatar
Seems like NOBODY use the word "PLEASE" around here.
Originally Posted by Still Looking

I'm not a MOD and do not dare apologize for whatever has been going on. My request is that you PLEASE limit your posting to 10 or fewer daily in Kansas City Metro forum and subforums.
Still Looking's Avatar
I'm not a MOD and do not dare apologize for whatever has been going on. My request is that you PLEASE limit your posting to 10 or fewer daily in Kansas City Metro forum and subforums. Originally Posted by algrace

If by posting you mean "starting threads" because you asked so nicely... Yes Sir I'll be Happy To Do So!
chicagoboy's Avatar
Be sure to express your appreciation to dearhunter for ridding KC of the scourge that was SL - it was all the Prophet's doing.
algrace's Avatar
If that's the case, DearHunter came through better than a designated hitter. Thanks, DH!
dearhunter's Avatar
the fucktard went out with a whimper...........hi SL
gfejunkie's Avatar
Be sure to express your appreciation to dearhunter for ridding KC of the scourge that was SL - it was all the Prophet's doing. Originally Posted by chicagoboy