You mention legalities, yet it is perfectly acceptable, nay REQUIRED, to list specifics on the activities line of every review. And EVERYONE DOES, don't they? AGAIN, if those "specifics" are not listed on the activities line the review would be rejected, wouldn't it? Don't have to be a CIA analyst to associate those activities with the ladies name and number/email/url on the top of the review. With a set standard "GFE", and maybe it's variations, or "PSE" would be the ONLY thing required or necessary. Specifics could be brought up in the ROS section.
So, if legal association is the argument it wouldn't take a homicide detective to figure it out. Fact is, the only way to be disassociated is to contact a mod and have them delete the review and thus the association and that the mods will do and have done. Ain't that right mods? 
Too much typing! Whew!!
Originally Posted by dumars
As a matter of fact, the donation is for
time.
I am not disagreeing that a defined activity list
can be helpful in the search for providers who enjoy similar BCD activities, but rest assured, YMMV is a commonality among the majority of providers.
Even if your efforts in establishing a standard for the different levels of service offerings come to fruition, one may then argue further for static pricing corresponding with each of the unique service levels.
It's a slippery slope. As much as we'd all like to be platinum plus rather than bronze value package recipients, most ladies with regulars realize more value from repeat clientele. Less need to spend the time and resources for continued advertising and screening. The lady's efforts are typically easier for the return client list.
Slow down and thoroughly examine what suits your fancy. Don't get lost in the reviews. Backchannels can work wonders if approached correctly.
I hope you find your happy and remain safe doing so.
Regards,
Al
